Abstract:This article outlines a methodology for characterising features of programme‐level assessment environments so that the relationship between features of the assessment environment and students’ learning response can be studied. The methodology was developed through the detailed case study of nine undergraduate degree programmes: one in each of three contrasting discipline areas in each of three contrasting universities. Each case study involved examination of course documentation, interviews with academics and interviews with students, following which each degree programme was coded in relation to a range of features of the assessment environment, such as the proportion of marks derived from examinations and the volume and timeliness of feedback on assignments. Programmes were found to differ profoundly in terms of variables that are known to have implications for student‐learning processes. They also differed widely in the extent to which they illustrated the application of conventional wisdom about curriculum design, embodied in national quality assurance guidelines and the Bologna Agreement. Programmes were found to have either a high volume of summative assessment or a high volume of formative‐only assessment, but never both at the same time. Programmes also differed in the mechanisms used to make goals and standards clear, having either highly explicit curriculum design or high volumes of written and oral feedback, but never both at the same time. The findings suggest that there are distinctive programme‐level assessment environments that operate in quite different ways despite all programmes studied being subject to the same quality assurance code of practice.

An International Assessment of Bachelor Degree Graduates' Learning Outcomes

Essential Foundations for Establishing Equivalence in Cross-National Higher Education Assessment

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Internationally: Insights and Frontiers

Automating assessment and evaluation for a bachelor’s degree program

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Challenges and International Perspectives

The Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Australia

The Governance, Policy and Strategy of Learning Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education

Linking Assessment for Learning, Improvement and Accountability

Keynote: Engaging Students in Higher Education: Strategies and Insights for ACU

The Value of Assessing Higher Education Student Learning Outcomes

Assessing Student Engagement and Outcomes: Modelling Insights from Australia and Around the World

Large-scale international assessments of learning outcomes: balancing the interests of multiple stakeholders

From Classroom to Real World: Application of Outcomes-Based Assessment in English Courses

Research And Governance Architectures To Develop The Field Of Learning Outcomes Assessment

Learning outcomes across disciplines and professions: measurement and interpretation

de l'enseignement supérieur en Australie

Outcome-Based Quality Assessment Framework for Higher Education

Characterising programme‐level assessment environments that support learning

Comparison and Evaluation of Learning Outcomes from an International Perspective: Development of a Best-Practice Process

Learning Outcome Oriented Programmatic Assessment

Learning Outcomes Assessment: Extrapolating from Study Abroad to International Service-Learning