The Use of SUnSET As a Non‐radioactive Method for Measuring Rates of Protein Synthesis in Whole Skeletal Muscles and in Single Fibers

Craig Andrew Goodman,Danielle M. Mabrey,John W. Frey,Hannah C. Lincoln,Man Hing Miu,Enrico K. Schmidt,Philippe Pierre,Troy A. Hornberger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.24.1_supplement.989.25
2010-01-01
Abstract:SUnSET (SUrface SEnsing of Translation) involves the immunological detection of puromycin in nascent peptides as a means for quantifying rates of protein synthesis (PS). To validate SUnSET against an established technique, plantaris muscles were subjected to synergist ablation (SA) or sham surgery. After 7d, muscles were incubated ex vivo with a flooding dose of 3H‐Phenylalanine (3H‐P) or with puromycin. According to the established 3H‐P method, SA induced a 3.4 fold increase in PS while a western blot (WB) version of SUnSET revealed a 3.6 fold increase, indicating that both techniques produce quantitatively similar results. Furthermore, SUnSET revealed that SA induces a 2.9 fold increase in PS when measurements were performed in vivo. SUnSET was also used to demonstrate that food deprivation induces a ~70% decrease in PS in vivo when measured with WB analysis and similar results were obtained when an immunohistochemical (IHC) version of SUnSET was applied to cross‐sections from control and food deprived samples. Finally, the IHC version of SUnSET was applied to muscles electroporated with constitutively active Akt (CA‐AKT) and it was determined that PS rates were 80% higher in CA‐AKT transfected fibers when compared to non‐transfected fibers in the same section. In conclusion, SUnSET is a simple and inexpensive alternative for measuring PS and allows for measurements to be performed at the single fiber level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?