Abstract:The 3-dimensional competitive Lotka–Volterra (LV) systems have been studied for more than two decades, and particular attention has been focused on bifurcation of limit cycles. For such a system, Zeeman (1993) identified 33 stable equivalence classes on a carrying simplex, among which only classes 26–31 may have limit cycles. It has been shown that all these 6 classes may possess two limit cycles, and the existence of three limit cycles was claimed in some of these classes. Recently, Gyllenberg and Yan (2009) studied the existence of four limit cycles, three of them are small-amplitude limit cycles due to Hopf bifurcation and one additional limit cycle, enclosing all the three small-amplitude limit cycles, is due to the existence of a heteroclinic cycle, and proposed a new conjecture including: (i) There exists a 3-d competitive LV system with at least 5 limit cycles. (ii) In the case of a heteroclinic cycle on the boundary of the carrying simplex of a 3-d competitive LV system, the vanishing of the first four focus values (the vanishing of the zero-order focus value means that there is a pair of purely imaginary eigenvalues at the positive equilibrium) does not imply that the heteroclinic cycle is neutrally stable, and hence it does not imply that the positive equilibrium is a center. (iii) In the case of a heteroclinic cycle on the boundary of the carrying simplex of a 3-d competitive LV system, the vanishing of the first three focus values and that the heteroclinic cycle is neutrally stable do not imply the vanishing of the third-order focus value, and hence they do not imply that the positive equilibrium is a center. In this paper, we will present two examples belonging to class 27 and another two examples belonging to class 26, which exhibit at least four small-amplitude limit cycles in the vicinity of the positive equilibrium due to Hopf bifurcations, and prove that the items (ii) and (iii) in the conjecture are true. Moreover, showing the existence of four small-amplitude limit cycles is a necessary step towards proving item (i) of the conjecture.

On the Number of Limit Cycles Near a Homoclinic Loop with a Nilpotent Singular Point

The Number of Limit Cycles by Perturbing a Piecewise Linear System with Three Zones

On Melnikov Functions of A Homoclinic Loop Through A Nilpotent Saddle for Planar Near-Hamiltonian Systems

Limit Cycle Bifurcations Near A Double Homoclinic Loop with A Nilpotent Saddle

Ten limit cycles near a cubic homoclinic loop with a nilpotent cusp

The Number of Limit Cycles Bifurcating from the Period Annulus of Quasi-Homogeneous Hamiltonian Systems at Any Order

Melnikov functions and limit cycle bifurcations for a class of piecewise Hamiltonian systems

The Number of Limit Cycles from a Cubic Center by the Melnikov Function of Any Order

Bifurcation of Limit Cycles by Perturbing Piecewise Smooth Integrable Non-Hamiltonian Systems

On the Number of Limit Cycles for Piecewise Polynomial Holomorphic Systems

On the Number of Limit Cycles in Double Homoclinic Bifurcations

On the Number of Limit Cycles Bifurcating from the Linear Center with a Cubic Switching Curve

Melnikov Functions for Period Annulus, Nondegenerate Centers, Heteroclinic and Homoclinic Cycles

ON THE NUMBER OF LIMIT CYCLES IN NEAR-HAMILTONIAN POLYNOMIAL SYSTEMS

A KIND OF BIFURCATION OF LIMIT CYCLES FROM A NILPOTENT CRITICAL POINT

Limit cycles of a class of piecewise smooth Liénard systems

On the Number of Limit Cycles in Small Perturbations of A Class of Hyper-Elliptic Hamiltonian Systems with One Nilpotent Saddle

Bifurcations of Limit Cycles and Center Problem for a Class of Cubic Nilpotent System.

Four Small Limit Cycles Around a Hopf Singular Point in 3-Dimensional Competitive Lotka–Volterra Systems

Global structures and bifurcations of a class of non-symmetric Lienard equations