Modeling Results on Detectability of Shallow Tunnels Using Rayleigh‐wave Diffraction
Chong Zeng,Jianghai Xia,Richard D. Miller,Georgios P. Tsoflias
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255116
2009-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009Modeling results on detectability of shallow tunnels using Rayleigh‐wave diffractionAuthors: Chong ZengJianghai XiaRichard D. MillerGeorgios P. TsofliasChong ZengKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Richard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, and Georgios P. TsofliasDepartment of Geology, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255116 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Rayleigh waves have been widely employed in near‐surface high‐resolution seismic investigations since the development of multi‐channel analysis of surface waves (MASW). Usually, detecting near‐surface features such as voids and tunnels by inverting Rayleigh‐wave phase velocities is challenging because the resolution of inverted shear (S) ‐wave velocity profiles is limited by a geophone‐ spread length. As a human‐made structure, a shallow tunnel can generate strong diffractions of seismic waves due to its angular shape and the high contrast elastic modulus around a tunnel surface. Since Rayleigh‐wave energy is dominant in the near‐surface P‐SV wavefield, the diffraction of Rayleigh waves is also significant on a shotgather, which allows a tunnel to be located directly by using a hyperbola curve matching technique. However, the size and depth of the tunnel can influence the diffraction energy dramatically. In case where the diffraction energy is too weak, it is usually impractical to recognize the hyperbolic pattern on a shotgather even with F‐K filtering. In this paper, we present finite‐difference numerical modeling results illustrating the variation of Rayleigh‐wave diffraction energy for different size tunnels. The modeling results reveal that the amplitude of Rayleigh‐wave diffraction decreases at different rate depending on tunnel size The diffraction energy decreases more rapidly when the size of a tunnel is smaller than 3/16 of the central depth of the tunnel. When a tunnel size is smaller than 1/32 of its depth, the diffraction energy of Rayleigh‐wave is less than 1% of the direct Rayleigh‐wave energy, which makes the hyperbola difficult to be recognized on a shotgather. Considering the noise and near‐surface attenuation in a real data, the ratio of size to depth of a detectable tunnel could be much larger than these modeling based results.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255116FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByA history of tunnels and using active seismic methods to find themSteven D. Sloan, Richard D. Miller, and Don W. Steeples19 March 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 3 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2009 Pages: 4338 publication data© 2009 Copyright © 2009 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 14 Oct 2009 CITATION INFORMATION Chong Zeng, Jianghai Xia, Richard D. Miller, and Georgios P. Tsoflias, (2009), "Modeling results on detectability of shallow tunnels using Rayleigh‐wave diffraction," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1425-1429. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255116 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...