Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009The separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from crosswell seismic data and applicationAuthors: Jiangping LiuXiangzhi ZengJianghai XiaSamba charlesJiangping LiuInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this author, Xiangzhi ZengInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this author, Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, and Samba charlesInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Compared to the surface seismic record and VSP record, the cross‐well seismic records of wave field is more complex. The separation of the P‐wave and S‐wave seismic section is important for interpretation and imaging. This paper discusses a new method that takes into consideration the characteristics of apparent velocity and polarization during both P‐wave and S‐wave propagations. In Approximating the Earth as an elastic body, P‐wave and S‐waves propagate independently through the internal part of the Earth. The wave field recorded at cross‐well geophones is a mixed wave field. Because of low S‐wave velocity, for a given frequency, its wavelength is shorter (which has a higher vertical resolution). In addition, we can get more information in interpretation by integrating both P‐wave and S‐wave than a single‐component. Many works about the separation of P‐ and S‐wave have been carried out. With the development of the seismic exploration, the wavefield separation techniques are getting more advanced. But most tradition P‐wave and S‐wave separation methods are based on the apparent velocity and polarization differences between P‐wave and S‐wave. For example, polarization rotation transform (Li and Cui, 1994) is due to the different polarization orientation between P‐wave and S‐wave; but the transform results are from the different apparent velocity (Trad, 2003). The tradition methods are difficult in ascertaining the polarization angle, which is sensitive to noise. The latest one (Trad, 2003) has a wider application, but there is no use when P‐wave and S‐wave interfere each other (Turner, 1990). At present, the main methods are wave equation methods and polarization separation methods, which both need P‐wave and S‐wave velocity information. From the full wave logging data and acoustic logging data, the velocity measurement is very different from the real velocity. While the polarization direction is very sensitive to the velocity information, the error of velocity measurement from logging data can have a great impact on the separated result. Compared to the traditional method in separating P‐wave from S‐wave, the method discussed in this paper does not use P‐wave and S‐wave velocities so it avoids the influence of the error in velocity measurements from logging data. Thus a more accurate result can be obtained. The processing of model testing and real crosswell data shows the accuracy and effectiveness of this method.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2009 Pages: 4338 publication data© 2009 Copyright © 2009 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 14 Oct 2009 CITATION INFORMATION Jiangping Liu, Xiangzhi Zeng, Jianghai Xia, and Samba charles, (2009), "The separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from crosswell seismic data and application," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1320-1324. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...

Separating Wave-Modes of Prestack Elastic Seismograms Using Pure Mode Wave Propagators in Anisotropic Media

Propagating pure wave modes in general anisotropic media, Part I: P-wave propagator

Elastic Reverse-Time Migration Without Wavefield Decomposition

Elastic Reverse Time Migration Without Wavefield Decomposition

Isotropic Elastic Reverse Time Migration

The Separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from Crosswell Seismic Data and Application

Analysis of Converted-Wave Extended Images for Shear-Velocity Estimation with Wave-Mode Decoupling

Simulating Propagation of Decomposed Elastic Waves Using Low-Rank Approximate Mixed-Domain Integral Operators for Heterogeneous Transversely Isotropic Media

Elastic least-squares reverse time migration based on wave-mode decomposition

Simulating Propagation of Separated Wave Modes in General Anisotropic Media, Part Ii: Qs-Wave Propagators

Elastic Reverse‐time Migration of VSP Transmitted PS Waves

Description of qP-wave propagation in anisotropic media, Part II: Separation of pure-mode scalar waves

Fast Algorithms for Elastic-Wave-mode Separation and Vector Decomposition Using Low-Rank Approximation for Anisotropic Media

P- AND S-WAVE SEPARATION AND DECOMPOSITION OF TWO- AND THREE-COMPONENT ELASTIC SEISMOGRAMS

Vector Domain P and S Decomposition in Viscoelastic Media

Up/down and P/S Decompositions of Elastic Wavefields Using Complex Seismic Traces with Applications to Calculating Poynting Vectors and Angle-Domain Common-Image Gathers from Reverse Time Migrations

Simulating kinematics of P- and S-wave scattering using scalar wave equations

Attenuation and dispersion of predicted seismic waves in the simplified poroelastic theory

Description of qP-wave propagation in anisotropic media, Part I: Pseudo-pure-mode wave equations

3D True-Amplitude Elastic Wave-Vector Decomposition in Heterogeneous Anisotropic Media

A Symplectic Stereomodelling Algorithm for Elastic Wave Propagation in Porous Media