Abstract:Introduction Previous research by the authors (Shi & Su, 2006) suggests that children’s deceptive behavior not only is related to their executive function as indicated in the studies of Carlson (1989) and Hala (2001), it may also be related to the magnitude of the situational intimidation felt by the children when they are deceiving or going to deceive others. Extending this argument, in this study we examined children's deceptive behavior as functions of felt intimidation. Method and Results In Study 1, different interactive partners were involved in an overt deceptive situation where children had to deceive directly in the face of their partner. When facing different partners, children would have different degree of intimidation and thus different patterns of deceptive behavior would be seen. In particular, this experiment focused on 6-year-olds' deceptive/honest behavior when facing a male adult, a female adult, a same-age boy or a same-age girl as their competitive target in overt situations. The results showed that children's gender, target's gender and age had an interaction effect on children's deceptive/honest behavior. Children tended to cheat the amiable female adult but were honest to the stricter male. To some extent, this result supports our hypothesis and underlies the interaction effect between gender and age of the deceivers and the people being deceived. Boys tend to cheat other same-age boys just as girls tend to cheat other same-age girls. Combining the results of our previous research and Study 1 of this research, we found that children's deceptive behavior was in fact so complicated that it was correlated with various factors including situational intimidation and children's theory of mind. Similarly, other studies (Shapiro, 2005; Ostrov, 2006) have shown that such variables as children's relational aggression and temperament are also associated with children's deceptive behavior. In order to systematically understand the possible antecedents leading to children's deceptive behavior (which might predict children's future internalizing and externalizing problematic behavior), in Study 2 we explored whether children's other social characteristics were involved in children's deceptive behavior in various situations. We adopted the social development scale for 4- to 7-year-olds to measure multiple dimensions of children's social developmental characteristics. The results showed that children's deception in covert situation was significantly correlated with children's will. On the other hand, children's behavioral overt deception was significantly correlated with emulative anxiety, while lying behavior was significantly correlated with their self-concept. Conclusion These results demonstrate that, if the deceptive action is relatively difficult to perform so that children have to perform it covertly, children's will power may affect their deceptive behavior. But if the deceptive action is easy to carry out overtly, then children's degree of emulative anxiety is very strongly associated with this deceptive behavior. As for lying, children who have a higher self-concept are more likely to lie. These and other results remind us of the fact that deception is related to various social characteristics of the children in different deceptive situations. When we study children's deceptive behavior in general and want to determine whether we need to intervene children's deceptive behavior, we need to take all these factors into consideration.

Distrust and retaliatory deception in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Trust and Deception in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Social Learning Perspective

Exploring the ability to deceive in children with autism spectrum disorders

Could Social Robots Facilitate Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in Learning Distrust and Deception?

Altered neural mechanisms of deception in individuals with autistic traits

Understanding Others’ Minds: Social Inference in Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Children’s Deceptive Behaviors And Related Social Characters

Do Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Show Selective Trust in Social Robots?

The Perceived Social Context Modulates Rule Learning in Autism

Strategic social decision making undergoes significant changes in typically developing and autistic early adolescents

The Understanding of Self- other in Deceptive Contexts in Autism

Theory of Robot Mind: False Belief Attribution to Social Robots in Children with and Without Autism

Updating trust: How children combine trait information with prior accuracy as they interact with an informant.

Truthful yet misleading: Elementary second-order deception in school-age children and its sociocognitive correlates

Atypical Dynamic Trust Learning in Individuals with High Autistic Traits in a Multi-Round Trust Game with Multiple Trustworthiness Cues

Hai||om children mistrust, but do not deceive, peers with opposing self-interests

Theory of Mind and Social Informant Discrepancy in Autism

In the Presence and Absence of Conflicting Testimony, Children's Selective Trust in the In-Group Informant in Moral Judgment and Knowledge Access.

A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Deception Detection by Neurodiverse Young Adults

Selective trust: Children's use of intention and outcome of past testimony.

Being Deceived: Information Asymmetry in Second-Order False Belief Tasks