Mixed-valence phosphato–hydrogenphosphato–iron network compounds 1∞{[C4N2H11.6]1.5[FeIIFeIII(PO4)(H0.8PO4)2]·H2O} and 3∞[FeII5FeIII2(PO4)2(H0.5PO4)4]: structure elucidation with the help of Mössbauer spectroscopy and a caveat on X-ray diffraction

Khalid Abu-Shandi,Heiner Winkler,Michael Gerdan,Franziska Emmerling,Biao Wu,Christoph Janiak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/b301610b
IF: 4
2003-01-01
Dalton Transactions
Abstract:The mixed-valence iron phosphates 1∞{[C4N2H11.6]1.5[FeIIFeIII(PO4)(H0.8PO4)2]·H2O} (1) and 3∞[FeII5FeIII2(PO4)2(H0.5PO4)4] (2) have been synthesized by hydrothermal methods. Their crystal structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and Mossbauer spectroscopy. Mossbauer spectroscopy suggests the Fe centers in compound 1 to be mostly in a trapped, mixed-valence +2 and +3 oxidation state from which the average protic hydrogen occupation on HPO4 and piperazinedium is calculated to be 0.8. At 4 K there is an intervalence tunneling process between part of the Fe2+ and Fe3+ atoms. Compound 1 contains linear strands of corner-sharing {FeO4} and {PO4} tetrahedra. The Fe atoms are bridged by Fe–O–P–O–Fe and Fe–O–Fe linkages. The strands are held together by hydrogen bonding interactions involving the piperazinedium and the water molecules of crystallization as well as complementary H-bonds between the HPO4-groups. The iron phosphate 2 is found from Mossbauer spectroscopy to be a trapped mixed-valence system with about 30% Fe3+/70% Fe2+ which translates perfectly into FeII5FeIII2 from which a total of two protic hydrogens on phosphate has been calculated. The crystal quality permitted the protic hydrogens in 1 and 2 to be found and their positions freely refined. At 4.2 K the Fe3+ is completely and Fe2+ partially magnetically ordered in 2. Compound 2 is a three-dimensional framework constructed from edge- and corner-sharing {FeO6} octahedra and {FeO5} trigonal bipyramids together with the {PO4} tetrahedra. Temperature-variable magnetic measurements confirm the oxidation state assignments for 1 and 2 through a matching experimental and calculated value for μeff at 300 K.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?