More Growth Inhibition by 125I Seed Continuous Low-Dose-Rate Radiation in A549 Lung Cancer Cell Line

Ang Qu,Junjie Wang,Yong Zhao,Hao Wang,Jinna Li,Jingjia Liu,Yuzhu Hou,Li Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2013.01.159
IF: 2.441
2013-01-01
Brachytherapy
Abstract:To investigate the differences of direct effects and mechanisms in lung cancer cell between external beam radiation (EBRT) and 125I seed continuous low-dose-rate radiation (CLDR). A549 cells were exposed to 0Gy, 2Gy, 4Gy and 8Gy of radiation, respectively. EBRT used 6 MV linear accelerator at high-dose-rate of 400cGy/min and CLDR used 125I seeds at initial low-dose-rate of 2.77 cGy/h. Cell survival and death and cell cycle were detected. Then we examined the expression of mRNA and protein of some molecules by real-time PCR and western blotting, which were associated with DNA double-strand break repair, cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. A general decrease in cloning efficiency was observed with increasing radiation dose. It was more effective in the CLDR group than in the EBRT group. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) value (CLDR/EBRT) was 1.50. Then we studied the data at 48h after different irradiation of 4Gy. The cell growth inhibition rate, cell death rate, apoptosis rate and percentages of cells in G2/M phase in CLDR group were all higher than those in EBRT group. In the CLDR group, p-H2AX (Ser139) expression was significantly elevated. DNA-PKcs protein level and the phosphorylation in T2609 and S2056 sites were also significantly increased. Meanwhile, we found ku80 protein level decreased and ku70 protein level was not obviously changed. Bcl-2 mRNA level was not changed, while protein level was significantly reduced. Bax mRNA and protein level were significantly increased. Cyclin B1 protein level was reduced. Compared with EBRT, CLDR was more effective in growth inhibition in A549 lung cancer cells. It downregulated Bcl-2 protein and upregulated expression of Bax mRNA to induce cell apoptosis. Downregulated CyclinB1 leads to induce G2/M phase arrest. But CLDR didn't inhibit the function of DNA-PK complex.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?