Abstract:Mismatch responses to tri‐modal roving stimulus sequences revealed a fronto‐parietal network of expectation violation shared across audition, somatosensation and vision. The intraparietal network hub showed specific sensitivity for cross‐modal predictability of stimulus transitions embedded in the multi‐modal sequence configuration. The brain is subjected to multi‐modal sensory information in an environment governed by statistical dependencies. Mismatch responses (MMRs), classically recorded with EEG, have provided valuable insights into the brain's processing of regularities and the generation of corresponding sensory predictions. Only few studies allow for comparisons of MMRs across multiple modalities in a simultaneous sensory stream and their corresponding cross‐modal context sensitivity remains unknown. Here, we used a tri‐modal version of the roving stimulus paradigm in fMRI to elicit MMRs in the auditory, somatosensory and visual modality. Participants (N = 29) were simultaneously presented with sequences of low and high intensity stimuli in each of the three senses while actively observing the tri‐modal input stream and occasionally reporting the intensity of the previous stimulus in a prompted modality. The sequences were based on a probabilistic model, defining transition probabilities such that, for each modality, stimuli were more likely to repeat (p = .825) than change (p = .175) and stimulus intensities were equiprobable (p = .5). Moreover, each transition was conditional on the configuration of the other two modalities comprising global (cross‐modal) predictive properties of the sequences. We identified a shared mismatch network of modality general inferior frontal and temporo‐parietal areas as well as sensory areas, where the connectivity (psychophysiological interaction) between these regions was modulated during mismatch processing. Further, we found deviant responses within the network to be modulated by local stimulus repetition, which suggests highly comparable processing of expectation violation across modalities. Moreover, hierarchically higher regions of the mismatch network in the temporo‐parietal area around the intraparietal sulcus were identified to signal cross‐modal expectation violation. With the consistency of MMRs across audition, somatosensation and vision, our study provides insights into a shared cortical network of uni‐ and multi‐modal expectation violation in response to sequence regularities.

Subjective present: a window of temporal integration indexed by mismatch negativity

Scanning the World in Three Seconds: Mismatch Negativity As an Indicator of Temporal Segmentation.

Tracking the mismatch information in visual short term memory: an event-related potential study.

Temporal context modulates cross-modality time discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence for supramodal temporal representation

The Mismatch Negativity: an Indicator of Perception of Regularities in Music

The temporal transition zone: A gradual approach to a subjective set‐point within the three‐second time window

Temporal Configuration as a New Feature of Sound: Psychological and Neurophysiological Evidence, Cross-species Consistency and Underlying Neuronal Mechanisms

Modulations of Temporal Perception by Consciously and Unconsciously Perceived Stimuli

Rubberband Effect in Temporal Control of Mismatch Negativity

Dissecting Mismatch Negativity: Early and Late Subcomponents for Detecting Deviants in Local and Global Sequence Regularities

Fronto-occipital mismatch responses in pre-attentive detection of visual changes: Implication on a generic brain network underlying Mismatch Negativity (MMN)

Detecting violation in abstract pitch patterns with mismatch negativity

"Temporal Windows" As Logistical Basis for Cognitive Processing

Situational Context is Important: Perceptual Grouping Modulates Temporal Perception

A multimodal cortical network of sensory expectation violation revealed by fMRI

Auditory change detection and visual selective attention: association between MMN and N2pc

Abnormal Temporal Window of Integration in Auditory Sensory Memory in Schizophrenia

Temporal Reference, Attentional Modulation, and Crossmodal Assimilation

Transient Attention Gates Access Consciousness: Coupling N2pc and P3 Latencies Using Dynamic Time Warping

Temporal perception deficits in schizophrenia: integration is the problem, not deployment of attentions

Adaptation to Visual or Auditory Time Intervals Modulates the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion