(1820) Proposal to Conserve the Name Machilus (lauraceae) with a Conserved Type

Yong Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25066044
2008-01-01
Taxon
Abstract:398. 1975), and later Stace (New Fl. Brit. Isles: 673. 1991) considered it the correct name, but these are the only men tions of A. xpseudopyramidalis in any Flora. In attempting to typify this name, we have searched for Schur materai in all possible herbaria (B, BP, BRNU, E, GOET, K, L, LW, MW, NA, P, PC, PH, PL, W, WU), and have not found any original material for lectotypification. We have therefore chosen as neotype a specimen from Le?n, Spain that agrees with the description of A. pseudopyramidalis in being similar to A. pyramidalis, yet has stolons like A. reptans. The specimen is identifiable with A. *hampeana. Thus both A. ^rotundifolia mdA. xpseudopyramidalis apply to the same hybrid formula, i.e., A. pyramidalis x A. reptans, as A. xhampeana, the name that has been consis tently used for this hybrid for over a century, e.g., by Fiori (Nuov. Fl. Ital. 2: 401. 1926), Fournier (Quatre Fl. Fr.: 813. 1961), Ball (I.e.), Gams (in Hegi, 111. Fl. Mitt.-Eur, ed. 2, 5(4): 2548. 1975), Stace (Le, 1975), De Langhe & al. (Nouv. Fl. B lg. Luxemb. N. France, ed. 2: 474. 1978; ed. 4: 560. 1992), Clapham & al. (Fl. Brit. Isl, ed. 3: 419. 1987). Ajuga ^rotundifolia was never treated as a hybrid, only as a species or a subspecies of A. pyramidalis, and A. xpseudopyrami dal s has only once been accepted in recent literature. How ever, according to ICBN Arts. 11.4 & 11.9, since the names A. ^rotundifolia and A. xpseudopyramidalis have priority over A. *hampeana and both apply to the same hybrid for mula (Art. H.4.1) the earliest of these names (A. xpseudopy ramidalis) would have to be adopted for this nothospecies. However, to preserve nomenclatural stability in accordance with Art. 14.2, and avoid the displacement of a well-es tablished and widespread name, the appropriate solution is t propose A. xhampeana for conservation against both A. xpseudopyramidalis and A. ^rotundifolia to avoid a change in nomenclature that will only cause conflict.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?