Negative-pressure cavitation extraction of cajaninstilbene acid and pinostrobin from pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] leaves and evaluation of antioxidant activity
Yu Kong,Zuo-Fu Wei,Yu-Jie Fu,Cheng-Bo Gu,Chun-Jian Zhao,Xiao-Hui Yao,Thomas Efferth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.079
IF: 8.8
2011-01-01
Food Chemistry
Abstract:In this study, an efficient negative-pressure cavitation extraction (NPCE) technique was developed to extract cajaninstilbene acid (CSA) and pinostrobin (PI) from pigeon pea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] leaves. The operating parameters were optimised using single-factor experiment and central composite design combined with response surface methodology. Well-fitting models for the extraction of CSA and PI were successfully established. From the economic perspective, the selected operating parameters were: extraction pressure −0.075 MPa, extraction temperature 45 °C, material size 40 mesh, ethanol concentration 80%, extraction time 30 min, liquid/solid ratio 30:1 and 4 extraction cycles. After method development, the extraction yields of CSA and PI using NPCE (5.675 ± 0.127 and 0.538 ± 0.014 mg/g, respectively) were compared with those of the well-known ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) (5.594 ± 0.084 and 0.529 ± 0.010 mg/g, respectively). Furthermore, the antioxidant activities of resulting extracts of NPCE and UAE were 0.300, 0.325 mg/mL (IC 50 ) and 1.095, 1.073 mmol/g (TEAC value), according to the DPPH and ABTS + radical-scavenging assay, respectively. Those results demonstrated that NPCE was comparable to UAE in term of extraction yields and antioxidant activity of extracts. This novel extraction technique also possesses the advantages of low equipment expenditure and capability of high throughput. The results of the present study may provide valuable data for process design and pilot-scale as well as industrial scale-up applications. Keywords Negative-pressure cavitation extraction Cajaninstilbene acid Pinostrobin Pigeon pea leaves Pilot-scale application 1 Introduction Pigeon pea [ Cajanus Cajan (L.) Millsp.], also called Congo pea, Red gram and Non-eye pea, is a kind of agricultural legume extensively grown in tropical and sub-tropical countries of the world. Although pigeon pea ranks only sixth in area and production in comparison to other grain legumes, its usage is more than others. Besides its usage as a good source of dietary essential minerals ( Duhan, Khetarpaul & Bishnoi, 2004 ), pigeon pea can be extensively used to substitute expensive animal protein in human diet ( Fujita et al., 2004 ). In addition, pigeon pea has been widely utilised as a traditional folk medicinal plant. It has been used for the treatment of diabetes, dysentery, hepatitis, measles, varicella and superficial infection, and for stabilising the menstrual period ( Abbiw, 1990; Duke & Vasquez, 1994; Grover, Yadav, & Vats, 2002; Milliken, 1997; Zhong, 2001 ). The extracts or components of pigeon pea possess antiplasmodial and antifungal activity and relieve disease of liver ( Akinsulie, Temiye, & Akarunu, 2005; Braga et al., 2007; Duker-Eshun, Jaroszewski, & Asomaning, 2004; Ghosh, Sarkar, & Sil, 2006 ). Pigeon pea extracts also exhibit notable effects on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats and the bioactivities of reducing the atherogenic properties of dietary cholesterol in mice. In a word, pigeon pea is attracting more and more attention due to its medicinal values. Especially in China, it has been exploited into a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for the therapy of ischemic necrosis of femoral head ( Fu et al., 2006 ). Chemical investigations and pharmacological studies indicated the main components in pigeon pea leaves possessing the beneficial efficacies on human health are classified into two sorts, flavanoids and stilbenes ( Akinsulie et al., 2005; Fu et al., 2008; Luo, Sun, Si, Chen, & Du, 2008; Zheng, Yang, Chen, & Sun, 2007 ). Cajaninstilbene acid (CSA) and pinostrobin (PI) ( Fig. 1 ) belong to stilbenes and flavonones, respectively. So far, CSA was only found in pigeon pea. They have been separated and purified in considerable content from extracts of pigeon pea leaves by the methods of column chromatography and recrystallisation in our previous study ( Kong et al., 2010a ). In addition, both of them present striking pharmacological activities. The stilbenes extract rich in CSA from pigeon pea leaves has potential action in reducing the atherogenic properties of dietary cholesterol and in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis ( Luo et al., 2008; Zheng et al., 2007 ). As a representative stilbene in pigeon pea leaves, the antioxidant activity of CSA is comparable to the natural antioxidant resveratrol ( Wu et al., 2009 ). It also possesses hypoglycemic and hypotriglycerimic activity ( Inman & Hoppe, 2002, 2003 ). PI, a nature flavanone known as an antispasmodic agent, possesses anti-aromatase activity in human placental microsomes and inhibits proliferation of MCF-7 cells stimulated by dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and 17β-estradiol ( Le Bail, Aubourg, & Habrioux, 2000 ). It also shows non-competitive activity to dengue-2 virus NS3 protease ( Kiat et al., 2006 ). Moreover, the biomass of pigeon pea leaves is considerable. Therefore, the investigations on efficient extracting CSA and PI from pigeon pea leaves are greatly significant for the utilisation of pigeon pea resources in food and pharmaceutical industry. Extraction holds the key to the recovery and purification of active constituents from plant materials. Many techniques have been developed to meet different requirements. Conventional procedures including heating-reflux extraction (HRE), maceration, Soxhlet extraction (SOE), etc., are time-consuming and have low efficiency ( Jerman, Trebše, & Mozetic Vodopivec, 2010 ). In recent years, more efficient extraction techniques including microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and accelerated solvent extraction, have been developed and successfully applied to extract natural compounds as a result of an increasing demand for new extraction techniques enabling automation, shortening extraction times and decreasing organic solvent consumption ( Ballard, Mallikarjunan, Zhou, & Keefe, 2010; Chen et al., 2007; Khan, Abert-Vian, Fabiano-Tixier, Dangles, & Chemat, 2009; Macías-Sánchez, Fernandez-Sevilla, Acién Fernández, Cerón García, & Molina Grima, 2010 ). For the extraction of CSA and PI, SFE and MAE have been applied. These two methods obtain higher extraction yields for CSA and PI as compared to heat-refluxing extraction ( Kong et al., 2009; Kong et al., 2010b ). However, they are inapplicable in industrial scale-up production due to the high cost for the equipments and low material throughput. In the present study, a novel negative-pressure cavitation extraction (NPCE) method was developed and investigated for the extraction of CSA and PI. The conventional procedures and aforementioned new extraction techniques are inefficient or characterised by huge expenditure on equipments and low capacity of throughput. However, NPCE may overcome those disadvantages. Hence, the objective of this study was to optimise NPCE of CSA and PI, which may provide valuable data for process design and pilot-scale as well as industrial scale-up applications. Extraction variables consist of extraction pressure, extraction temperature, material size, ethanol concentration, liquid/solid ratio, extraction time and cycle. Response surface methodology (RSM) is an ideal tool for process optimisation. It is a collection of statistical and mathematical technique that possess the advantage of reducing number of experimental trials needed to evaluate multiple parameters and their interactions in comparison to other approaches. RSM was used for optimising extraction process in the present study, and the optimised conditions were successfully applied in pilot-scale test. Subsequently, the antioxidant activity of the resulting extracts was evaluated. 2 Materials and methods 2.1 Plant material The pigeon pea leaves were collected from Hainan Province, PR China, and identified by Professor Shao-Quan Nie from the Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China. Voucher specimens (No. 052056001001001) were deposited in the herbarium of this Key Laboratory. The material was dried in the shade, powdered by a disintegrator (HX-200A, Yongkang Hardware and Medical Instrument Plant, China) and then sieved to pass through 20–60 mesh sieve (Harbin Ouerfu Filter Material Co., Ltd., China). The powder was kept at −20 °C before used. 2.2 Chemical and reagents Employed reference compounds of CSA (98%, HPLC grade) and PI (95%, HPLC grade) were separated and purified in our laboratory ( Kong et al., 2010a ). The structures were confirmed by comparing their UV, MS, 1 H NMR and 13 C NMR data with the literature ( Cooksey, Dahiya, Garratt, & Strange, 1982; Cuong, Sung, Kamperdick, & Adam, 1996 ). 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ascorbic acid (VC), methanol and formic acid of HPLC grade were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). A total antioxidant capacity assay kit obtained from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (China). Ethanol was of analytical grade (Harbin Xinchun chemical reagents Corp., China). Deionised water was filtered using a Milli-Q water-purification system from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA). 2.3 Extraction procedures 2.3.1 Negative pressure cavitation extraction (NPCE) NPCE was carried out using a device designed and manufactured in our laboratory, which was described in detail in our previous study ( Liu et al., 2009 ). In the present study, the equipment was smaller in loading volume and a heating system was applied. The schematic diagram and the actual NPCE device are shown in Fig. 2 . In brief, the operating methodology was as follows: firstly, the heating system was turned on and the water was heated to the set temperature. Three grams of material in specified mesh and extraction solvent of specified volume were added into the extraction pot from the sample inlet. Then, the vacuum pump was turned on. When the negative pressure reached the desired value, the air inlet valve was adjusted slowly until the pressure kept at the set value. Volatilised solvent was returned to the extraction pot by the condenser. When the scheduled time was achieved, the air supply was cut off firstly, and the negative pressure in the NPCE device was decreased to atmospheric pressure. Then, the filtered extraction solution was collected and fresh solvent was added in extraction pot. Thus, a new cycle was started. After the process was repeated for desired cycles, the extraction solution was collected and the solid residue was removed through the discharge lid. For the purpose of determination of the yields of targeted compounds, the measurement of total volume of extraction solution was carried out. Simultaneously, 1 mL was kept at −20 °C for further analysis. 2.3.2 Ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) A comparative study was conducted between the well-known UAE and the developed NPCE after the optimisation of the latter. UAE was run in an ultrasonic bath (Kunshan Ultrasonic Instrument, Kunshan, China) using the conditions optimised in NPCE at normal pressure. The extracting solution was filtered by membrane filtration and analysed by HPLC for the quantification of CSA and PI. In addition, the antioxidant activity of extract was evaluated. 2.4 Experimental design To obtain appropriate extraction conditions for CSA and PI, a series of studies were conducted to investigate the effect of NPCE conditions on their extraction yields. The investigated parameters included extraction pressure, extraction temperature, material size, ethanol concentration, liquid/solid ratio, extraction time and cycle. The first two factors, extraction pressure and extraction temperature, were studied by using single-factor experiment, respectively, which ignore the interactions between the different extraction parameters. To procure the best extraction pressure, nine different pressures (0, −0.020, −0.040, −0.050, −0.055, −0.060, −0.070, −0.075 and −0.080 MPa) were investigated at room temperature (about 25 °C). Three grams of pigeon pea leaves material with size of 40 mesh were extracted using 80% ethanol (90 mL) for 60 min in one cycle. The tests for optimising temperature were conducted by contacting 90 mL of 80% ethanol with 3.00 g leaves of 40 mesh, and then extracting 60 min for once at optimised pressure and a temperature ranging from room temperature (about 25 °C) to 55 °C, respectively. In statistics, a central composite design (CCD) is an experimental design, which is useful in response surface methodology, for building a second order (quadratic) model for the response variables without needing a complete three-level factorial experiment. Consequently, with regard to optimising the other five factors, a 2 5−1 factorial portion CCD with response surface methodology was applied to determine the most appropriate combination of extraction variables for the yields of CSA and PI from pigeon pea leaves. As shown in Table 1 , the effect of five parameters on the extraction of CSA and PI were studied at five levels. The coded variables of each factor were calculated by the following equation ( Banik & Pandey, 2008 ): Coded value = actual level - ( high level + low level ) / 2 ( high level - low level ) / 2 CCD consisting of 26 experimental runs with six replicates at the centre point was shown in the first five columns of Table 1 . All the experiments were conducted in random order to minimise the effects of unexplained variability in the observed response due to extraneous factors. The experimental data were fitted with a second-order polynomial model, which have the following form: Y = β 0 + ∑ i = 1 k β i X i + ∑ i = 1 k β ii X i 2 + ∑ i = 1 i < j k - 1 ∑ j = 2 k β ij X i Xj ( k = 5 ) Where Y is the responses function; X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 and X 5 are the independent variables affecting the responses function Y ; β 0 , β i , β ii and β ij are the regression coefficients for intercept, linear, quadratic, and interaction terms, respectively; k represents the number of variables. 2.5 Determination of CSA and PI CSA and PI were quantified following our previous study ( Kong et al., 2010b ). The analysis was conducted on a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) liquid chromatography system, composed of a Model 600 controller liquid chromatograph, Millennium 32 system software, a Model Delta 600 pump and a Model 2996 photodiode array detection (DAD) system. A 10 μL solution of the samples was directly injected into HPLC system, which was separated on a Symmetry Shield™ RP 18 reversed-phase packing column (150 mm × 3.9 mm i.d., Waters, Ireland). The calibration curves were established basing on eight different concentrations of analytes and showed good linearity. The curves for CSA and PI were Y = 29903956 X −35966 ( R 2 = 0.9998) and Y = 138010189 X −9556 ( R 2 = 0.9999), respectively, where Y is the peak area of the analyte, and X is the concentration of the analyte (mg/mL). 2.6 Statistical analysis All experiments were conducted in triplicate and the average values of extracted CSA and PI were used for statistical analysis. Multiple regression analyses, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance test were performed using response surface analysis procedure (Design-Expert 7.1.3). The responses obtained from CCD were subjected to multiple regression to estimate the coefficients of the second-order polynomial model. The polynomial model fitting was expressed by determination coefficient R 2 . The significances of polynomial model and regression coefficient of all term were tested by F-test and t-test, respectively. P < 0.05 was regarded as significant. The response surface contour plots of the variables were analysed using Statistica 6.0 software. 2.7 NPCE pilot-scale application A pilot-scale application of NPCE was conducted using pilot-scale equipments. Two kilograms of pigeon pea leaves were employed with the conditions optimised in laboratory scale study. Subsequently, the antioxidant activity of the resulting extract was evaluated. 2.8 Analysis of antioxidant activity The antioxidant activities of pigeon pea leaves extracts were addressed using the following methods. 2.8.1 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity assay The hydrogen atoms or electron-donation ability of the extracts was measured from the bleaching of a purple-coloured ethanol solution of DPPH. The assay was performed according to the method reported by ( Wu et al., 2009 ). Briefly, 100 μL of the extracts ethanol solution with different concentrations of 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 mg/mL was mixed mixed with ethanol (1.4 mL) and then added to 0.004% DPPH (1 mL, Sigma-Aldrich) in ethanol. The mixtures were shaken vigorously and left to stand in the dark at room temperature for 70 min, then the reduction of DPPH radical is evaluated spectrophotometrically by monitoring the decrease in absorbance at 517 nm against a blank of pure ethanol. Ascorbic acid (VC) was used as synthetic reference antioxidants. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of each solution was expressed as inhibition percentage (IP%) and calculated using the following equation: IP (%) = (1− A 517 sample/ A 517 DPPH solution) × 100. Finally, the data obtained from above experiments was used to establish calibration curves and to calculate the IC 50 values, defined as the concentration of the test material required to cause a 50% decrease in initial DPPH free radical concentration. 2.8.2 ABTS + radical-scavenging assay The total antioxidant capacity of extracts was determined by a total antioxidant capacity assay kit with the ABTS method (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, China). Blue/green ABTS + was produced by reacting ABTS with potassium persulfate and allowing the mixture to stand in the dark at room temperature for 12–16 h before use. The resulting ABTS + solution was diluted with 80% ethanol to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.05 at the wavelength of maximum absorbance, 734 nm. Plant extracts (10 μL) were allowed to react with 200 μL of the diluted ABTS + solution for 2–6 min in the dark at room temperature. Then the absorbance of the mixture was recorded at 734 nm. To obtain a correct measurement, the samples were diluted with 80% ethanol until an inhibition percentage of 20–80% was obtained. Trolox, a water-soluble analogue of vitamin E, is used as the reference standard to prepare a calibration curve for a concentration range of 0.15–1.5 mM. Results were expressed as trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), which was defined as the mmol of trolox whose antioxidant activity is equivalent to the activity of 1 g of extracts. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 NPCE mechanism The formation, expansion and collapse of tiny bubbles under negative pressure are the basic mechanism of NPCE ( Fig. 3 ). The NPCE system was separated into four areas: bubble formation area, suspension area, axis air flow area and turbulent area. During NPCE, a continuous air flow was introduced into the liquid-solid system to produce an intense cavitation effect and a vigorous stirring effect. In the bubble formation area, the air flow was interrupted to generate tiny bubbles as a result of negative pressure and surface tension at the liquid-vapor-solid interface, resulting in the formation of highly instable liquid-gas-solid system. Subsequently, the bubbles enter the suspension area. In this area, the volumes of bubbles expand rapidly along with the outside pressure and then the bubbles collapse by the action of negative pressure. During the collapse of bubbles, intensive cavitation and stirring effects were produced so that the surface of material is corroded and the solvent can easily diffuse into the inside of material. In the axis air flow area, the target compounds in the matrix are efficiently released into the solvent owing to an intense stirring and mass transfer effect. In the turbulent area, the process of mass transfer is accomplished by an action of turbulent stirring effect. 3.2 Optimisation of NPCE conditions 3.2.1 Effect of negative pressure Extraction pressure was a critical factor that would influence the extraction efficiency of NPCE process. In this NPCE system, extraction pressure was adjusted by the regulation of air flow rate. The higher the negative pressure, the lower was the air flow rate. The effect of different extraction pressures on the extraction yields of CSA and PI were shown in Fig. 4 A and B. Extraction was carried out at different pressure conditions while the other parameters were the same as those described in Section 2.4 . Significant effect of extraction pressure on the extraction yields of CSA and PI was observed. In NPCE, extraction efficiency depends on three effects including soak effect, stirring effect and cavitation effect. The soak effect of solvent is the basis of all extraction devices. For NPCE, stirring effect and cavitation effect both promote extraction of target compounds by means of accelerating mass transfer and disrupting cell. Soak effect keep constant when the parameters including temperature, time, solvent composition and ratio of liquid to solid are not changed. The efficiency of NPCE depends on the balance between stirring effect and cavitation effect when the other parameters are constant. Stirring effect is directly controlled by air flow rate. Cavitation effect is affected mediately by air flow rate in terms of negative pressure and amount of cavitation bubbles. Stirring effect decreases with the decrease of air flow rate, but cavitation effect firstly increases rapidly with the decrease of air flow rate on account of the increase of negative pressure and then decreases expeditiously due to the lack of air leading to decrease in amount of cavitation bubbles. Therefore, when the air flow rate decreases from maximum (negative pressure 0 MPa), the stirring effect decreases from maximum value but cavitation effect increases from inexistence. Thus, the extraction efficiency is likely to increase, remain constant, or decrease with decrease in the air flow rate, which depends on the composite effect of stirring effect and cavitation effect, both controlled by the air flow rate. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 4 A and B, two peak amplitudes of yields are obtained with decrease in the air flow rate, and negative pressure −0.075 and −0.070 MPa give the highest yields of CSA and PI 2.249 ± 0.043 and 0.213 ± 0.004 mg/g, respectively. The yield of PI is a little lower than the highest value when −0.075 MPa is used. Hence, −0.075 MPa is selected to further investigate other parameters. 3.2.2 Effect of extraction temperature Generally, the extraction temperature was an important factor contributing to increased extraction efficiency. In the present study, extraction was carried out at different temperatures ranging from 25 to 55 °C while the other parameters were the same as those described in Section 2.4 . The results were shown in Fig. 4 C. Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used for the analysis of the variance in yield. It was found that extraction temperature also had a significant effect on the extraction yields of CSA and PI. When extraction temperature varied from 25 to 45 °C, the variances of extraction yields were relatively obvious. After a temperature of 45 °C was achieved, the extraction yields had no significant increase with the increase of temperature. Thus, 45 °C was selected for the following tests in consideration of the low energy consumption. 3.2.3 Optimisation by central composite design Five parameters including material size, ethanol concentration, extraction time, liquid/solid ratio and extraction cycle supposed to affect active substances production were selected for central composite design. The yields of CSA and PI were selected as the response. The experimental design matrix is presented in Table 1 . Thirty two-run- experiments were performed in triplicate. 3.2.3.1 Fitting the model The regression analyses were carried out to fit mathematical models to the experimental data. The second-order polynomial model used to express CSA yield ( Y c) and PI yield ( Y p) as equation of independent variables are shown below (in terms of coded levels), in which insignificant terms except linear term were dropped from the regression equation ( Wang et al., 2007 ): Yc = 5.14 - 0.39 X 1 - 0.005 X 2 - 0.16 X 3 + 0.20 X 4 + 0.20 X 5 - 0.069 X 3 X 4 - 0.12 X 3 X 5 - 0.069 X 4 X 5 - 0.31 X 1 2 - 0.092 X 2 2 - 0.13 X 3 2 - 0.047 X 5 2 Yp = 0.52 - 0.028 X 1 - 0.011 X 2 + 0.0093 X 3 + 0.0062 X 4 + 0.020 X 5 - 0.034 X 1 2 - 0.013 X 2 2 Where Y c and Y p are the extraction yields of CSA and PI (mg/g), respectively; X 1 is the material size (mesh), X 2 is the ethanol concentration (%), X 3 is the extraction time (min), X 4 is the liquid/solid ratio and X 5 is the extraction cycle. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) (in Tables 2 ) of CSA and PI extraction yields showed that experimental data had determination coefficient ( R 2 ) of 0.988 and 0.961, respectively, and the calculated models was not significant lack of fit at p > 0.05. That implies 98.8% and 96.1% of the variability in the response of CSA and PI extraction yields, respectively, could be explained by the models. The Fisher’s F-test with very low probability values ( p < 0.0001) indicated the models were highly significant. Moreover, the significance of each coefficient was determined using t-test and p -value, which is listed in Table 2 . The larger the magnitude of t -test and smaller the p -value, the more significant is the corresponding coefficient. From Table 2 , it was seen that the factors with the largest effects on the CSA yield were the linear term of X 1 , X 3 , X 4 and X 5 , the quadratic term of X 1 2 , X 2 2 , X 3 2 and X 5 2 , the interactions X 3 X 4 , X 3 X 5 and X 4 X 5 . Thus, based on the above model, the optimal conditions for CSA were: material size 37 mesh ( X 1 ), ethanol concentration 81% ( X 2 ), extraction time 30 min ( X 3 ), liquid/solid ratio 35:1 ( X 4 ) and 5 extraction cycles ( X 5 ), the yield was 5.892 mg/g under these conditions. Moreover, the factors with the largest effects on the PI yield were the linear term of X 1 , X 2 , X 3 and X 5 , the quadratic term of X 1 2 and X 2 2 . All of the interactions were insignificant. According to the above model, the maximum predictive extraction yield of PI 0.632 mg/g was obtained. The predictive values of relevant parameters for PI were: material size 33 mesh ( X 1 ), ethanol concentration 76% ( X 2 ), extraction time 150 min ( X 3 ), liquid/solid ratio 35:1 ( X 4 ) and 5 extraction cycles ( X 5 ). 3.2.3.2 Analysis of response surface The response surfaces developed by the fitted quadratic polynomial equation were shown in Fig. 5 . Each figure presented the effect of two variables on the yield by keeping the other three variables at its middle level. Drawing surface response plots of the model was regarded as the best way to visualise the influence of the independent variables on the dependent one ( Wei, Liao, Zhang, Liu, & Jiang, 2009 ). The yields of active substances predicted for different values of the test variables and the type of interactions between test variables can be found in these. The circular and elliptical or saddle nature of the contour plots imply negligible interaction and significant interaction between the corresponding variables, respectively. The effects of mutual interaction of the independent variables on the extraction yield of CSA can also be seen on three dimensional response surface curves shown in Fig. 5 A–C. Obviously, all of the three variables, extraction time, liquid/solid ratio and extraction cycle, influenced significantly CSA yield. It can be seen from Fig. 5 A that the 3D plot of extraction time and liquid/solid ratio had remarkable interaction. A increase in CSA yield resulted as the liquid/solid ratio was increased. However, CSA yield firstly increased and then decreased with increase of extraction time. The shorter the extraction time, the more significant was the increase in yield with increase in liquid/solid ratio, and the higher yield was obtained with short extraction time. Those results suggested that shorter extraction time was more suitable for NPCE of CSA because longer extraction time led to the chemical decomposition of dissociative CSA. Hence, high liquid/solid ratio was needed to shorten the extraction time. The same phenomenon has happened in supercritical fluid carbon dioxide (SF-CO 2 ) extraction (SFE) of CSA ( Kong et al., 2009 ). As shown in Fig. 5 B, the interaction between extraction time and extraction cycle was similar to that between extraction time and liquid/solid ratio. High CSA yield was observed with increase in extraction cycle and it firstly increased and then decreased with increase in extraction time. It was also found that the shorter the extraction time, the more significant was the increase in yield with increase in extraction cycle, and the higher yield was obtained with short extraction time. The Fig. 5 C revealed that CSA yield increase with simultaneous increase in liquid/solid ratio and extraction cycle. The yield of CSA increased rapidly with the increase in extraction cycle at a lower liquid/solid ratio, whereas, yield of CSA increased slightly with increase of extraction cycle at a higher liquid/solid ratio. This indicated that there was a significant interaction between these two parameters. As shown in Table 2 , high liquid/solid ratio ( X 4 ) and more extraction cycle ( X 5 ) were found to play an important role for NPCE of CSA and PI. This was ascribed to non-polarity or slight polarity of CSA and PI, which means that they are relatively difficult to dissolve in aqueous solution of ethanol. It was also found that moderate material size, rather than the smallest material size, gave the highest yields of CSA and PI. In general, decrease in material size was beneficial for mass transfer due to high specific surface and short path length of mass transfer. On the contrary, excessive small material size may result in technical difficulties related to the permeability of the solid bed during the mixing of the material with solvent ( Banik & Pandey, 2008 ). Moreover, the lower yields obtained with particles of smaller material size could be due to the particles staying at the surface of the solvent during extraction, thereby limiting their exposition to cavitation. In summary, from the economic perspective, the optimised conditions for the coinstantaneous extraction of CSA and PI from pigeon pea leaves using NPCE were: extraction pressure −0.075 MPa, extraction temperature 45 °C, material size 40 mesh, ethanol concentration 80%, extraction time 30 min, liquid/solid ratio 30:1 and 4 extraction cycles. 3.3 Validation of the models In order to validate the suitability of the model equations for predicting the response values, a verification experiment was carried out under above optimised conditions. Under these conditions, the extraction yields of CSA and PI reached 5.675 ± 0.127 and 0.538 ± 0.014 mg/g ( n = 3), whereas the response values predicted by the model equations were 5.602 and 0.528 mg/g, respectively. The results of analysis indicated that the two groups of experimental values were in good agreement with the predicted ones, with low percentage bias, suggesting that the RSM models were reliable and reasonable. 3.4 NPCE pilot-scale application An experimental NPCE pilot-scale application was carried out under the optimised conditions in above NPCE study. The extraction yields of CSA and PI obtained using pilot-scale were 5.614 ± 0.141 and 0.527 ± 0.019 mg/g, respectively, which were very close to the NPCE results in laboratory scale (5.675 ± 0.127 and 0.538 ± 0.014 mg/g). These indicated that NPCE of CSA and PI process was scalable to pilot-scale application. 3.5 Comparison of NPCE with UAE UAE has been proven to improve the extraction efficiency and shorten extraction time, as compared with conventional extraction methods ( Vinatoru, 2001 ). As an efficient extraction method, UAE has attracted growing interest for the extraction of secondary metabolites from plant materials. In previous report, it was found that NPCE and UAE had an obvious advantage on cellular damage and intensification of mass transport over conventional methods due to obvious destruction of the surface of pigeon pea leaves after NPCE and UAE observed by scanning electron microscopy ( Liu et al., 2009 ). In our present study, for comparing, UAE was also used to extract CSA and PI. Three grams of pigeon pea leaves in 40 mesh were extracted with 90 mL of 80% ethanol by ultrasonic for 30 min at 45 °C for 4 cycles. The obtained extraction yields of CSA and PI were 5.594 ± 0.084 and 0.529 ± 0.010 mg/g, which were a little lower than those of NPCE (5.675 ± 0.127 and 0.538 ± 0.014 mg/g, respectively). In addition, we easily have access to negative pressure cavitation equipments due to the simple equipment construction and low equipment expenditure, and its material throughput was considerable when equipped with a high-power vacuum pump. However, the equipments of those new techniques including MAE, UAE and SFE were complicated, and their throughput was limited. Therefore, it can be concluded that NPCE was more suitable for industrial scale-up applications than the aforementioned new techniques due to high extraction efficiency, low equipment expenditure and high throughput. 3.6 Antioxidant activity NPCE and UAE were finally evaluated by comparing the antioxidant potential of the corresponding extracts from the comparison test of two extraction methods by DPPH and ABTS radicals. 3.6.1 DPPH radical scavenging activity assay The concentration of the test material required to cause a 50% decrease in initial DPPH free radical concentration (IC 50 ) was used as an index to compare the antioxidant activity. Lower IC 50 value reflects better DPPH radical scavenging activity. The results are presented in Fig. 6 . It was observed NPCE extract from pigeon pea leaves exhibited potent DPPH radical-scavenging activity with an IC 50 value of 0.300 mg/mL, which was comparable to that of UAE extract (0.325 mg/mL). IC 50 value for the extract of NPCE pilot-scale application was 0.310 mg/mL, however, IC 50 value for the reference VC was only 0.188 mg/mL. It has been reported that IC 50 values of CSA and PI were 0.302 and more than 0.500 mg/mL, respectively ( Wu et al., 2009 ). Although PI did not present in vitro antioxidant activity, it possesses remarkable pharmacological activities ( Kiat et al., 2006; Le Bail et al., 2000 ). 3.6.2 ABTS + radical-scavenging assay This assay is based on the inhibition by antioxidants of the absorbance of ABTS + and this inhibition depends on the antioxidant capacity of the tested sample. The TEAC value is a quantification of antioxidant activity of the extracts and higher TEAC values demonstrate higher antioxidant activity. In this assay, NPCE extract from pigeon pea leaves also exhibited potent antioxidative activity with a TEAC value of 1.095 mmol/g, which was comparable to that of UAE extract (1.073 mmol/g). TEAC value of extract obtained by NPCE pilot-scale application was 1.105 mmol/g. According to above results, extracts obtained by NPCE possessed potent antioxidative capacity, which was comparable to that of UAE extract. Therefore, NPCE was an excellent candidate for the extraction of antioxidant from pigeon pea leaves. 4 Conclusion In the present study, negative pressure cavitation was applied to the extraction of CSA and PI from pigeon pea leaves. NPCE operating conditions were optimised using RSM to achieve an efficient extraction of CSA and PI, and the antioxidant activity of the resulting extract was evaluated in vitro . Analysis of variance showed that the regression models for CSA and PI by NPCE were statistically good with a significance level of p < 0.0001 and the models had no significant ( p > 0.05) lack of fit. Thus, well-fitting models for the extraction of CSA and PI were successfully established. From the economic perspective, the optimised conditions for the coinstantaneous extraction of CSA and PI from pigeon pea leaves using NPCE were: extraction pressure −0.075 MPa, extraction temperature 45 °C, material size 40 mesh, ethanol concentration 80%, extraction time 30 min, liquid/solid ratio 30:1 and 4 extraction cycles. The response fitted models were verified using the above conditions. The experimental values were shown to be very close to those predicted, thus indicating adequacy of the fitted models. Compared with the well-known extraction process UAE, the novel NPCE method offers high yields and potent antioxidative activity. Moreover, it was proved that the optimised NPCE process was scalable by pilot-scale application. Therefore, the NPCE method developed in this study was an excellent alternative for the extraction of secondary metabolites from pigeon pea leaves in industrial production due to high extraction efficiency, low equipment expenditure, high throughput and potent antioxidative activity. Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports by Key Program for Science and Technology Development of Harbin (2009AA3BS083), National Natural Science Foundation of China (30770231), Heilongjiang Province Science Foundation for Excellent Youths (JC200704), Agricultural Science and Technology Achievements Transformation Fund Program (2009GB23600514), Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education (108049), Project for Distinguished Teacher Abroad, Chinese Ministry of Education (MS2010DBLY031), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DL09EA04), the Special Fund of Forestry Industrial Research for Public Welfare of China (201004040), and NEFU Foundation for Excellent Doctoral Project (GRAP09). References Abbiw, 1990 Abbiw, D.K. (1990). Useful Plants of Ghana . The Royal Botanic Gardens. Richmond. Akinsulie et al., 2005 A.O. Akinsulie E.O. Temiye A.S. Akarunu Clinical evaluation of extract of Cajanus cajan (Ciklavit) in sickle cell anaemia Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 51 2005 200 205 Ballard et al., 2010 T.S. Ballard P. Mallikarjunan K. Zhou S. Keefe Microwave-assisted extraction of phenolic antioxidant compounds from peanut skins Food Chemistry 120 2010 1185 1192 Banik and Pandey, 2008 R.M. Banik D.K. Pandey Optimizing conditions for oleanolic acid extraction from Lantana camara roots using response surface methodology Industrial crops and products 27 2008 241 248 Braga et al., 2007 F.G. Braga M.L.M. Bouzada R.L. Fabri M.O. Matos F.O. Moreira E. Scio Antileishmanial and antifungal activity of plants used in traditional medicine in Brazil Journal of Ethnopharmacology 111 2007 396 402 Chen et al., 2007 J.H. Chen W.L. Li B.J. Yang X.H. Guo F.S.C. Lee X.R. Wang Determination of four major saponins in the seeds of Aesculus chinensis Bunge using accelerated solvent extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray-time of flight mass spectrometry Analytica Chimica Acta 596 2007 273 280 Cooksey et al., 1982 C.J. Cooksey J.S. Dahiya P.J. Garratt R.N. Strange Two novel stilbene-2-carboxylic acid phytoalexins from Cajanus cajan Phytochemistry 21 1982 2935 2938 Cuong et al., 1996 N.M. Cuong T.V. Sung C. Kamperdick G. Adam Flavanoids from Carya tonkinensis Pharmazie 51 1996 128 Duhan et al., 2004 A. Duhan N. Khetarpaul S. Bishnoi HCl-extractability of zinc and copper as affected by soaking, dehulling, cooking and germination of high yielding pigeon pea cultivars Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 17 2004 597 604 Duke and Vasquez, 1994 J.A. Duke R. Vasquez Amazonian ethnobotanical dictionary 1994 CRC Press PL: Boca Raton Duker-Eshun et al., 2004 G. Duker-Eshun J.W. Jaroszewski W.A. Asomaning Antiplasmodial constituents of Cajanus cajan Phytotherapy Research 18 2004 128 130 Fu et al., 2008 Y.J. Fu W. Liu Y.G. Zu M.H. Tong S.M. Li M.M. Yan Enzyme assisted extraction of luteolin and apigenin from pigeon pea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] leaves Food Chemistry 111 2008 508 512 Fu et al., 2006 Y.J. Fu Y.G. Zu W. Liu T. Efferth N.J. Zhang X.N. Liu Optimization of luteolin separation from pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] leaves by macroporous resins Journal of Chromatography A 1137 2006 145 152 Fujita et al., 2004 K. Fujita Y. Kai M. Takayanagi H. El-Shemy J.J. Adu-Gyamfi P.K. Mohapatra Genotypic variability of pigeon pea in distribution of photosynthetic carbon at low phosphorus level Plant Science 166 2004 641 649 Ghosh et al., 2006 A. Ghosh K. Sarkar P.C. Sil Protective effect of a 43 kD protein from the leaves of the herb, Cajanus indicus L. on chloroform induced hepatic-disorder Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 39 2006 197 207 Grover et al., 2002 J.K. Grover S. Yadav V. Vats Medicinal plants of India with anti-diabetic potential Journal of Ethnopharmacology 81 2002 81 100 Inman and Hoppe, 2002 Inman, W.D., & Hoppe, D.C. (2002). In: Compositions containing hyportriglyceridemically active stilbenenoids . W. I. P. O. I. Bureau. Inman and Hoppe, 2003 Inman, W.D., & Hoppe, D.C. (2003). In: Compositions containing hypoglucemically active stilbenoids . US Patent: Insemed Incorporated, Glen Allen, VA, US. Jerman et al., 2010 T. Jerman P. Trebše B. Mozetic Vodopivec Ultrasound-assisted solid liquid extraction (USLE) of olive fruit ( Olea europaea ) phenolic compounds Food Chemistry 123 2010 175 182 Khan et al., 2009 M.K. Khan M. Abert-Vian A.S. Fabiano-Tixier O. Dangles F. Chemat Ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols (flavanone glycosides) from orange ( Citrus sinensis L.) peel Food Chemistry 119 2009 851 858 Kiat et al., 2006 T.S. Kiat R. Pippen R. Yusof H. Ibrahim N. Khalidd N.A. Rahman Inhibitory activity of cyclohexenyl chalcone derivatives and flavonoids of fingerroot, Boesenbergia rotunda (L.), towards dengue-2 virus NS3 protease Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 16 2006 3337 3340 Kong et al., 2010a Y. Kong Y.J. Fu Y.G. Zu F.R. Chang Y.H. Chen X.L. Liu Cajanuslactone, a new coumarin with anti-bacterial activity from pigeon pea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] leaves Food Chemistry 121 2010 1150 1155 Kong et al., 2009 Y. Kong Y.J. Fu Y.G. Zu W. Liu W. Wang X. Hua Ethanol modified supercritical fluid extraction and antioxidant activity of cajaninstilbene acid and pinostrobin from pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] leaves Food Chemistry 117 2009 152 159 Kong et al., 2010b Y. Kong Y.G. Zu Y.J. Fu W. Liu F.R. Chang J. Li Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of cajaninstilbene acid and pinostrobin from pigeon pea leaves followed by RP-HPLC-DAD determination Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 23 2010 382 388 Le Bail et al., 2000 J.C. Le Bail L. Aubourg G. Habrioux Effects of pinostrobin on estrogen metabolism and estrogen receptor transactivation Cancer Letter 156 2000 37 44 Liu et al., 2009 W. Liu Y.J. Fu Y.G. Zu Y. Kong L. Zhang B.S. Zu Negative-pressure cavitation extraction for the determination of flavonoids in pigeon pea leaves by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry Journal of Chromatography A 1216 2009 3841 3850 Luo et al., 2008 Q.F. Luo L. Sun J.Y. Si D.H. Chen H.G. Du Hypocholesterolemic effect of stilbene extract from Cajanus cajan L. on serum and hepatic lipid in diet-induced hyperlipidemic mice Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica 43 2008 145 149 Macías-Sánchez et al., 2010 M.D. Macías-Sánchez J.M. Fernandez-Sevilla F.G. Acién Fernández M.C. Cerón García E. Molina Grima Supercritical fluid extraction of carotenoids from Scenedesmus almeriensis Food Chemistry 123 2010 928 935 Milliken, 1997 Milliken, W. (1997). Plants for Malaria, Plants for Fever . The Royal Botanic Gardens. Richmond. Vinatoru, 2001 M. Vinatoru An overview of the ultrasonically assisted extraction of bioactive principles from herbs Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 8 2001 303 313 Wang et al., 2007 S.J. Wang F. Chen J.H. Wu Z.F. Wang X.J. Liao X.S. Hu Optimization of pectin extraction assisted by microwave from apple pomace using response surface methodology Journal of Food Engineering 78 2007 693 700 Wei et al., 2009 Z.J. Wei A.M. Liao H.X. Zhang J. Liu S.T. Jiang Optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of silkworm pupal oil applying the response surface methodology Bioresource Technology 100 2009 4214 4219 Wu et al., 2009 N. Wu K. Fu Y.J. Fu Y.G. Zu F.R. Chang Y.H. Chen Antioxidant Activities of Extracts and Main Components of Pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Leaves Molecules 14 2009 1032 1043 Zheng et al., 2007 Y.Y. Zheng J. Yang D.H. Chen L. Sun Effects of the stilbene extracts from Cajanus Cajan L. on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica 42 2007 562 565 Zhong, 2001 X.R. Zhong Usages of pigeon pea Research and Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine 3 2001 47