Novel Dithiolene Nickel Complex Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Reaction for Hydrogen Production in Nonaqueous and Aqueous Solutions
Niu Zhicheng,Yang Lemin,Xiao Yongxin,Xue Min,Zhou Jiarong,Zhang Lei,Zhang Jiujun,Wilkinson David P.,Ni Chunlin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-022-00708-8
2022-01-01
Electrocatalysis
Abstract:Three molecular catalysts based on mononuclear nickel(II) complexes with square planar geometries, [BzPy]2[Ni(mnt)2] (1), [BzPy]2[Ni(i-mnt)2] (2), and [BzPy]2[Ni(tdas)2] (3) (BzPy = benzyl pyridinium) are synthesized by the reaction of NiCl2∙6H2O, [BzPy]Br, and Na2(mnt)/Na2(i-mnt)/Na2(tdas) (mnt = 1,2-dicyanoethylene-1,2-dithiolate for (1), i-mnt = 2,2-dicyanoethylene-1,1-dithiolate for (2), and tdas = 1,2,5-thiadiazole-3,4-dithiolate for (3)), respectively. The structures and compositions of these three catalysts are characterized by XRD, elemental analysis, FT-IR, and ESI-MS. The electrochemical properties and the corresponding catalytic activities of these three catalysts are studied by cyclic voltammetry. The controlled-potential electrolysis with gas chromatography analysis confirms the hydrogen production with a turnover frequency (TOF) of 116.89, 165.51, and 189.16 moles of H2 per mole of catalyst per hour at a potential of − 0.99 V (versus SHE) in acetonitrile solutions containing the catalysts, respectively. In a neutral buffer solution, these three molecular catalysts exhibit a TOF of 411.85, 488.76, and 555.06 mol of H2 per mole of catalyst per hour at a potential of − 0.49 V (versus SHE), respectively, indicating that Complex 3 constitutes the better active catalyst than Complexes 1 and 2. For fundamental understanding, a catalytic HER mechanism is also proposed.