Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of different treatment regimens guided by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch on the outcomes of patients with mild ischemic stroke caused by acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 segment occlusion. Methods From January 2013 to February 2018, the clinical data of patients with mild ischemic stroke caused by acute MCA M1 segment occlusion and admitted to the Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University were analyzed retrospectively. Mild stroke was defined as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5, and the MRA-DWI mismatch was defined as MCA M1 segment occlusion confirmed by MRA and the DWI-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score ≥6. According to the clinical decision, they were divided into endovascular treatment group and intravenous thrombolytic therapy group. The primary outcome measure was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days after onset, ≤2 was defined as good outcome. The secondary outcome measure was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 7 days after treatment and the mortality rate at 90 d. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent effects of different treatment regimens on outcomes. Results A total of 38 patients were enrolled, 19 (50. 00％) in the intravenous thrombolytic therapy group, and 19 in the endovascular treatment group (50. 00％, including 5 patients with intratracheal thrombectomy after intravenous thrombolysis); 27 patients had good outcomes (71. 05％) and 11 had poor outcomes (28. 95％). Except for total cholesterol level, there were no significant differences in demography, vascular risk factors, and all baseline clinical data between the endovascular treatment group and the intravenous thrombolytic therapy group. The rate of good outcome in the endovascular treatment group was significantly higher than that in the intravenous thrombolytic therapy group (89. 47％ vs. 2. 63％; P = 0. 029), and there was no significant difference between the incidence of sICH within 7 days (15. 79％ vs. 5. 26％; P = 0. 604) and 90-day mortality (0％ vs. 10. 53％; P = 0. 486). The proportion of patients who underwent endovascular treatment in the good outcome group was significantly higher than that in the poor outcome group (62. 96％ vs. 18. 18％; P = 0. 029). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that endovascular treatment was an independent predictor of good outcome (odds ratio 0. 103, 95％ confidence interval 0. 015-0. 714; P = 0. 021). Conclusion Endovascular treatment is an independent predictor of good outcome in patients with mild ischemic stroke caused by acute MCA M1 segment occlusion.

Infarction Patterns Predict Differential Response To Thrombolysis In Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Patients

DWI Lesion Patterns Predict Outcome in Stroke Patients with Thrombolysis.

Too Good to Treat? Ischemic Stroke Patients with Small Computed Tomography Perfusion Lesions May Not Benefit from Thrombolysis

A study on application value of susceptibility weighted imaging combined with platelet distribution width in intravenous thrombolysis for treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction

Optimal Delay Time of CT Perfusion for Predicting Cerebral Parenchymal Hematoma After Intra-Arterial tPA Treatment.

Tissue at risk in acute stroke patients treated beyond 8 h after symptom onset

Correlation Between Perfusion Weighted Imaging-Diffusion Weighted Imaging Mismatch and Early Reperfusion after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Evaluation of clinical-diffusion mismatch in intra-arterial thrombolysis treatment for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion

Prediction of Recanalization Trumps Prediction of Tissue Fate

Alberta stroke programme early CT score on diffusion-weighted imaging and clot burden scoring on MR angiography in the prediction of hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarction

Abstract W P10: Endovascular Treatment for Anterior Circulation Stroke Leads to Similar Outcomes in Very Early (within 3 Hours) Versus Selected Late (beyond 8 Hours) Presenting Patients

The TOAST classification and imaging characteristics in acute cerebral infarction with different treatment methods

Significance of clinical-diffusion mismatch in hyperacute cerebral infarction

Presence of deep white matter lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging is a negative predictor of early dramatic improvement after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis

Scattered Brain Infarct Pattern on Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Treatment of MRA-DWI Mismatched Patients with Mild Ischemic Stroke Caused by Middle Cerebral Artery M1 Segment Occlusion: Comparison of Endovascular Treatment and Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy

Abstract TP213: Predictors of Functional Independence Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis as Adjunct to Mechanical Thrombectomy

Spatial Accuracy of Computed Tomography Perfusion to Estimate the Follow-Up Infarct on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging after Successful Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Predictors of clinical outcome in patients with acute perforating artery infarction.

Retrospective Study of Stroke Mechanism and Lesion Patterns in Middle Cerebral Artery Territory

Clinical-CT mismatch defined NIHSS ≥ 8 and CT-ASPECTS ≥ 9 as a reliable marker of candidacy for intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke