Abstract:Our integrated modelling method allows for managers to use citizen sightings combined with detection/non‐detection surveys to estimate robust indices of abundance for both high‐ and low‐density, and wide‐spread versus patchily distributed species. Through comparison with previous studies, we highlight how broad‐scale programmes, such as the statewide efforts to estimate species distributions undertaken here, can benefit substantively from integrated models that leverage additional data (here, incidental records) from a larger region of space, and thus capture more landscape heterogeneity than is plausible within formalized surveys alone. Estimating species distribution and abundance is foundational to effective management and conservation. Using an integrated species distribution model that combines presence‐only data from various sources with detection/non‐detection data from structured surveys, we estimated the distribution and expected abundance of three difficult‐to‐monitor mammals of management concern across New York State, namely, coyotes (Canis latrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus) and black bears (Ursus americanus). Three distinct landscape‐scale camera trap surveys provided detection/non‐detection data over 9 years between 2013 and 2021, and we augmented those data with incidental records of our focal species from public repositories. We used an inhomogeneous Poisson point process to construct an integrated model that fit both data types simultaneously. We demonstrate a simple application of spatial point density of all species records in the accessed public databases to inform the thinning process to account for unknown spatial sampling in the presence‐only data, often referred to as the 'magic covariate'. Using this approach, we examine habitat associations and provide spatially explicit estimates in expected abundance across the entirety of New York State for all three focal species. As expected, coyotes were the most widely distributed and abundant species, with a strong positive association with agricultural land uses. Bobcats exhibited low expected abundance throughout the state and showed positive associations with deciduous forest and forest edge, and a negative association with road density. Finally, we observed considerable spatial variation in abundance of black bears with expected abundance increasing in association with various forest cover and composition covariates and decreasing with crop cover. We present insights into habitat associations and spatial variation in abundance, and provide management implications for each of the species of interest. Synthesis and applications. Our integrated modelling method allows for managers to use citizen sightings combined with detection/non‐detection surveys to estimate robust indices of abundance for both high‐ and low‐density, and wide‐spread versus patchily distributed species. Through comparison with previous studies, we highlight how broad‐scale programmes, such as the statewide efforts to estimate species distributions undertaken here, can benefit substantively from integrated models that leverage additional data (here, incidental records) from a larger region of space, and thus capture more landscape heterogeneity than is plausible within formalized surveys alone.

Assessing Remotely Triggered Cameras for Surveying Carnivore Distribution

Motion‐sensitive cameras track population abundance changes in a boreal mammal community in southwestern Yukon, Canada

Using Infrared-Triggered Cameras to Monitor Activity of Forest Carnivores

An Empirical Evaluation of Camera Trap Study Design: How Many, How Long and When?

Arboreal Camera Trapping: a Reliable Tool to Monitor Plant‐frugivore Interactions in the Trees on Large Scales

Use of Remote-Trip Cameras for Wildlife Surveys and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conservation Activities at a Nature Reserve in Sichuan Province, China

An overwinter protocol for detecting wolverines and other carnivores at camera traps paired with automated scent dispensers

Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data

Carnivore distribution across habitats in a central-European landscape: a camera trap study

How Long is Enough to Detect Terrestrial Animals? Estimating the Minimum Trapping Effort on Camera Traps

Integrating presence‐only and detection/non‐detection data to estimate distributions and expected abundance of difficult‐to‐monitor species on a landscape‐scale

Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use

Landscape-scale population trends in the occurrence and abundance of wildlife populations using long term camera-trapping data

Monitoring Animal Populations With Cameras Using Open, Multistate, N‐Mixture Models

Increasing Detections of Small to Medium-Sized Mammals Using Multiple Game Cameras

Can we count you: validating density estimation methods for unmarked wildlife with camera traps

Remote monitoring of vigilance behavior in large herbivores using acceleration data

Comparing direct (live-trapping) and indirect (camera-trapping) approaches for estimating the abundance of weasels (Mustela nivalis)

One size does not fit all: a novel approach for determining the Realised Viewshed Size for remote camera traps

Random versus Game Trail-Based Camera Trap Placement Strategy for Monitoring Terrestrial Mammal Communities

Estimating effective survey duration in camera trap distance sampling surveys