Improved Diagnosis of Early Renal Dysfunction in Diabetic Nephropathies by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

ying dong,wen qiang wang,paoluo fan,jiguo cao,xi jun lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.090

IF: 3.694

2011-01-01

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Abstract:PurposeWe performed a prospective study to compare the value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) in a quantitative evaluation of renal cortex perfusion in patients suspected with early diabetic nephropathies (DN), with renal biopsy as the golden standard.Material & MethodsThe study protocol was approved by the Hospital review board; each patient gave written informed consent. A total of twenty-six right kidneys in 26 consecutive patients (14 males and 12 females, mean age 55.6 years) of clinically suspected early DN were examined with CDFI and CEUS. Time-intensity curves (TICs) were created with Qlab software (PHILIPS). The slope rate of elevation curve (A) , descending curve (α), area under curve (AUC) , derived peak intensity (DPI) and time to peak (TTP) were measured in renal cortex. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict the diagnostic criteria of quantitative indexes and their diagnostic potential were compared with CDFI. Control group included 45 healthy volunteers.ResultsDPI less than 12 and AUC greater than 1400 had high utility in early DN, with 67% and 66% specificity, 88% and 85% sensitivity. The results were significantly better than RI, and PSV in CDFI had no significant difference in the early DN (P > 0.05).ConclusionCEUS might be helpful to improve early diagnosis of DN compared with CDFI by quantitative analyses. AUC and DPI might be valuable quantitative indexes. PurposeWe performed a prospective study to compare the value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) in a quantitative evaluation of renal cortex perfusion in patients suspected with early diabetic nephropathies (DN), with renal biopsy as the golden standard. We performed a prospective study to compare the value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) in a quantitative evaluation of renal cortex perfusion in patients suspected with early diabetic nephropathies (DN), with renal biopsy as the golden standard. Material & MethodsThe study protocol was approved by the Hospital review board; each patient gave written informed consent. A total of twenty-six right kidneys in 26 consecutive patients (14 males and 12 females, mean age 55.6 years) of clinically suspected early DN were examined with CDFI and CEUS. Time-intensity curves (TICs) were created with Qlab software (PHILIPS). The slope rate of elevation curve (A) , descending curve (α), area under curve (AUC) , derived peak intensity (DPI) and time to peak (TTP) were measured in renal cortex. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict the diagnostic criteria of quantitative indexes and their diagnostic potential were compared with CDFI. Control group included 45 healthy volunteers. The study protocol was approved by the Hospital review board; each patient gave written informed consent. A total of twenty-six right kidneys in 26 consecutive patients (14 males and 12 females, mean age 55.6 years) of clinically suspected early DN were examined with CDFI and CEUS. Time-intensity curves (TICs) were created with Qlab software (PHILIPS). The slope rate of elevation curve (A) , descending curve (α), area under curve (AUC) , derived peak intensity (DPI) and time to peak (TTP) were measured in renal cortex. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict the diagnostic criteria of quantitative indexes and their diagnostic potential were compared with CDFI. Control group included 45 healthy volunteers. ResultsDPI less than 12 and AUC greater than 1400 had high utility in early DN, with 67% and 66% specificity, 88% and 85% sensitivity. The results were significantly better than RI, and PSV in CDFI had no significant difference in the early DN (P > 0.05). DPI less than 12 and AUC greater than 1400 had high utility in early DN, with 67% and 66% specificity, 88% and 85% sensitivity. The results were significantly better than RI, and PSV in CDFI had no significant difference in the early DN (P > 0.05). ConclusionCEUS might be helpful to improve early diagnosis of DN compared with CDFI by quantitative analyses. AUC and DPI might be valuable quantitative indexes. CEUS might be helpful to improve early diagnosis of DN compared with CDFI by quantitative analyses. AUC and DPI might be valuable quantitative indexes.