Interspecific Hybridization in Cucumis - Progress, Problems, and Perspectives

JF Chen,J Adelberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.35.1.11
2000-01-01
HortScience
Abstract:the genus Cucumis, an amphidiploid was reported from the cross of C. anguria L. and C. dipsaceus E. ex S. (Yadava et al., 1986).However, in the Cucurbitaceae only in Cucurbita has interspecific hybridization been successfully utilized for crop improvement (Robinson and Decker-Walters, 1997).Cucumis contains two species of economic importance, melon (C.melo L., 2n = 24) and cucumber (C.sativus L., 2n = 14).The importance of wild Cucumis species has long been recognized because they possess resistance to pathogens, such as powdery mildew [caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea (Schlechtend.: Fr) Pollacci], downy mildew [caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk.& M.A. Curtis) Rostovzev], anthracnose [caused by Colletotrichum orbiculare (Berk.& Mont) Arx], and fusarium wilt (caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlechtend.: Fr.) (Kirkbride , 1993;Leppick, 1966;Lower and Edwards, 1986).Genetic variation is relatively limited in cucumber (Staub et al., 1987); thus, efforts to create interspecific hybrids become more critical and meaningful.In 1859, Naudin first tried to cross melon with cucumber and other species (Naudin, 1859).Historically, various approaches (traditional and biotechnological) for interspecific hybridization have been used in Cucumis to overcome the fertilization barriers between cucumber, melon, and wild species, but with only limited success.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?