Abstract:Traffic crash statistics and previous research have shown an increased risk of traffic crashes at signalized intersections. How to diagnose safety problems and develop effective countermeasures to reduce crash rate at intersections is a key task for traffic engineers and researchers. This study aims at investigating whether the driving simulator can be used as a valid tool to assess traffic safety at signalized intersections. In support of the research objective, this simulator validity study was conducted from two perspectives, a traffic parameter (speed) and a safety parameter (crash history). A signalized intersection with as many important features (including roadway geometries, traffic control devices, intersection surroundings, and buildings) was replicated into a high-fidelity driving simulator. A driving simulator experiment with eight scenarios at the intersection were conducted to determine if the subjects’ speed behavior and traffic risk patterns in the driving simulator were similar to what were found at the real intersection. The experiment results showed that speed data observed from the field and in the simulator experiment both follow normal distributions and have equal means for each intersection approach, which validated the driving simulator in absolute terms. Furthermore, this study used an innovative approach of using surrogate safety measures from the simulator to contrast with the crash analysis for the field data. The simulator experiment results indicated that compared to the right-turn lane with the low rear-end crash history record (2 crashes), subjects showed a series of more risky behaviors at the right-turn lane with the high rear-end crash history record (16 crashes), including higher deceleration rate (1.80±1.20m/s2 versus 0.80±0.65m/s2), higher non-stop right-turn rate on red (81.67% versus 57.63%), higher right-turn speed as stop line (18.38±8.90km/h versus 14.68±6.04km/h), shorter following distance (30.19±13.43m versus 35.58±13.41m), and higher rear-end probability (9/59=0.153 versus 2/60=0.033). Therefore, the relative validity of driving simulator was well established for the traffic safety studies at signalized intersections.

The Study of Driving Simulator Validation for Physiological Signal Measures

Research of Validation Between Driving Simulator and Car Test

Driving Simulator Validation for Drivers' Speed Behavior

Research-oriented Vehicle Driving Simulator Validation

Experiment Study on Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Driving Fatigue Based on Physiological Signals

The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.

Using Traffic and Safety Measures for Driving Simulator Validation

Driving simulator validation for research on driving behavior at entrance of urban underground road

Validating A Driving Simulator Using Surrogate Safety Measures

Development of an EEG Headband for Stress Measurement on Driving Simulators

Validation of Vehicle Driving Simulator from Perspective of Velocity and Trajectory Based Driving Behavior under Curve Conditions

Study on correlation between driving performance and driver physiology

Comprehensive experimental scheme using a driving simulator

Research on Fidelity of Driving Simulators

Do Drivers’ Decision or Emotion Behaviors Made in a Video Test Count? A Comparison Between Video Watching and Simulator Driving

A multimodal physiological dataset for driving behaviour analysis

Human-Machine Interface Evaluation Using EEG in Driving Simulator

Beyond Basics: Can a Driving Simulator Reliably Reproduce Real Vehicle Dynamics?

Vehicle Sensor Data-Based Analysis on the Driving Style Differences Between Operating Indoor Simulator and On-Road Instrumented Vehicle

A study of the identification method of driving fatigue based on physiological signals

Exploring the Relationship Between Electroencephalography (EEG) and Ordinary Driving Behavior: A Simulated Driving Study