Developmental Iron Deficiency Impairs Rat Watermaze Performance.

B T Felt,H Tian,J Shao,J Barks,T Schallert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200410000-00064
IF: 3.953
2004-01-01
Pediatric Research
Abstract:Background: Iron deficiency (ID), a common nutritional disorder during development, has been associated with cognitive and behavioral impairments. Previous studies suggest developmental ID in rats affects hippocampal dendritic morphology and alters performance in the Morris Water Maze (MWM). Objective: To explore the nature of MWM deficits in rats that had ID during development. Design/Methods: 8-week old dams were randomized to iron sufficient (IS) or iron deficient (ID) groups. IS or ID diets were given during gestation and lactation. All pups received the IS diet after postnatal day (P)20. At P35, 8 to 9 IS and ID group males began one of two MWM assessments. 1st: Place learning (standard MWM) and memory (platform removed at 24 hours – probe) were assessed. Rats continued with trials to enhance learning to search the target quadrant then had a second probe trial. 2nd: IS and ID rats had thigmotaxis training before standard MWM assessment and probe. Data (days to criteria, latency, quadrant preference and thigmotaxis) were analyzed using one-way and repeated measures ANOVA (RPM). Results: 1st: ID group rats had longer latencies on place learning (RPM p<0.001). Two ID rats reached criteria (ID+) but six did not (ID-). ID- rats had significantly more thigmotaxis in place learning trials than IS rats (RPM p<0.002) but ID+ and IS rats did not differ. In the probe, IS rats had greater quadrant preference (30.94 ± 9.03) than ID- rats (-19.62 ± 8.84) and less thigmotaxis. After additional trials, latency was similar for IS and all ID rats. However, IS vs ID- remained different on probe quadrant preference (25.49 ± 5.83 vs -20.46 ± 10.32, p<0.05). 2nd: After thigmotaxis training, IS rats still had shorter latencies than ID rats in the standard MWM (RPM, p<0.001) and greater quadrant preference than ID- rats on the probe (10.29 ± 11.31 vs -33.30 ± 0.01). Conclusions: Previously ID rats demonstrate poorer MWM performance that appears related to persistent thigmotaxis behavior. Although learning improved for ID rats with additional training, memory for platform location did not. Thigmotaxis training did not impair learning measures for IS rats. The results suggest that developmental ID is associated with poorer ability to leave thigmotaxis and switch-strategies in spatial learning and memory tasks.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?