MP69-04 NUTRITIONAL SCREENING IS STRONGLY ASSOCIATED WITH OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH TARGETED AGENTS FOR ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

Gu Weijie,Zhu Yao,Ye Dingwei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2508

2015-01-01

Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Advanced II1 Apr 2015MP69-04 NUTRITIONAL SCREENING IS STRONGLY ASSOCIATED WITH OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH TARGETED AGENTS FOR ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA Gu Weijie, Zhu Yao, and Ye Dingwei Gu WeijieGu Weijie More articles by this author , Zhu YaoZhu Yao More articles by this author , and Ye DingweiYe Dingwei More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2508AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Although commonly observed, malnutrition is poorly characterized and frequently underdiagnosed in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The ability of nutritional screening tools to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with RCC has not been adequately validated. To investigate the performance of nutritional screening tools and their additional prognostic value in patients with advanced RCC treated with target therapies. METHODS Patients were prospectively recruited from three tertiary hospitals between 2009 and 2013. Nutritional status was evaluated using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF). OS and grade 3/4 adverse events were recorded as outcome of interest and their associations with nutritional status were assessed using Cox regression and Logistic regression, respectively. The incremental value in prognostication was evaluated using concordance index and decision curve analysis. RESULTS Within 300 enrolled patients, 31.7% and 21.3% were classified at risk of malnutrition according to GNRI and MNA-SF, respectively. Both GNRI and MNA-SF were independent predictors of OS in multivariate analyses, and provided significant added benefit to Heng risk classification. Compared to MNA-SF, GNRI contributed a larger increment in concordance index (0.041 vs. 0.016). Nutritional screen, however, failed to associate with garde 3/4 adverse events in multivariate analyses. Further investigations are needed, using more comprehensive and accurate assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS The prospective study confirmed the importance of nutritional screening tools in survival prognostication of advanced RCC. The standardized and objective measurements would allow clinicians to identify advanced RCC patients with poor survival outcome. Individualized nutrition assessment and possible intervention strategies may be included in the multidisciplinary treatment. Multivariate Cox regression models analyzing the associations between nutritional status, as assessed by the GNRI and MNA-SF scores, and overall survival Parameters GNRI model MNA-SF model HR (95%CI) p-value HR (95%CI) p-value Sex Male Ref. Ref. Female 0.883 (0.638–1.224) 0.637 1.070 (0.771–1.486) 0.684 Age 1.004 (0.971–1.038) 0.836 1.016 (0.982–1.051) 0.366 Charlson comorbidity index 0.807 (0.544–1.195) 0.248 0.789 (0.529–1.176) 0.244 Heng risk stratification Low Ref. Ref. Intermediate 2.601 (1.630–4.148) <0.001 2.741 (1.724–4.359) <0.001 High 3.929 (2.155–7.163) <0.001 2.741 (1.724–4.359) <0.001 Nephrectomy No Ref. Ref. Yes 0.560 (0.228–1.378) 0.207 0.492 (0.198–1.222) 0.126 NLR <5 Ref. Ref. >5 1.541 (0.728–3.264) 0.259 1.266 (0.208–2.638) 0.528 Geographic location Urban Ref. Ref. Rural 1.506 (1.085–2.091) 0.014 1.696 (1.226–2.346) 0.001 Nutrition risk Normal Ref. Ref. Low 1.502 (1.069–2.498) 0.023 1.320 (0.886–1.967) 0.172 High 3.157 (2.273–5.353) <0.001 2.784 (1.506–6.065) 0.002 Incremental performance (using Heng model as benchmark) â–3 C index 0.041 0.016 Net benefit at threshold of 38%* at 2 year 7.7 per 100 patients 6.7 per 100 patients Net benefit at threshold of 50% at 2 year 13.2 per 100 patients 13.4 per 100 patients Abbreviations: GNRI, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; MNA-SF, Mini Nutritional Assessment–Short Form; HR, hazard ratio; NLR, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; C index, Harrell’s concordance index; * For the entire group, 2-year survival rate was 38%. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e867-e868 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Gu Weijie More articles by this author Zhu Yao More articles by this author Ye Dingwei More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...