Abstract:The structural changes of bacteriorhodopsin during its photochemical cycle, as revealed by crystal structures of trapped intermediates, have provided insights to the proton translocation mechanism. Because accumulation of the last photointermediate, O, appears to be hindered by lattice forces in the crystals, the only information about the structure of this state is from suggested analogies with the determined structures of the non-illuminated D85S mutant and wild-type bacteriorhodopsin at low pH. We used electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of site-directed spin labels at the extracellular protein surface in membranes to test these models. Spin–spin dipolar interactions in the authentic O state compared to the non-illuminated state revealed that the distance between helices C and F increases by ca 4 Å, there is no distance change between helices D and F, and the distance between helix D and helix B of the adjacent monomer increases. Further, the mobility changes of single labels indicate that helices E and F move outward from the proton channel at the center of the protein, and helix D tilts inward. The overall pattern of movements suggests that the model at acid pH is a better representation of the O state than D85S. However, the mobility analysis of spin-labels on the B–C interhelical loop indicates that the antiparallel β-sheet maintains its ordered secondary structure in O, instead of the predicted disorder in the two structural models. During decay of the O state, the last step of the photocycle, a proton is transferred from Asp85 to proton release complex in the extracellular proton channel. The structural changes in O suggest the need of large conformational changes to drive the Arg82 side-chain back to its initial orientation towards Asp85, and to rearrange the numerous water molecules in this region in order to conduct the proton away from Asp85.

Photodynamics of All-Trans Retinal Protonated Schiff Base in Bacteriorhodopsin and Methanol Solution

Retinal photoisomerization versus counterion protonation in light and dark-adapted bacteriorhodopsin and its primary photoproduct

Photoinduced isomerization sampling of retinal in bacteriorhodopsin

The use of sinecatechins (polyphenon E) ointment for treatment of external genital warts

Excited-state dynamics of all-trans protonated retinal Schiff base in CRABPII-based rhodopsin mimics

Quantum dynamics of the femtosecond photoisomerization of retinal in bacteriorhodopsin

Resonance Raman evidence for an all-trans to 13-cis isomerization in the proton-pumping cycle of bacteriorhodopsin

Understanding structure and function in the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin

Electron paramagnetic resonance study of structural changes in the O photointermediate of bacteriorhodopsin.

Reversible Photochromic Reactions of Bacteriorhodopsin from Halobacterium salinarum at Femto- and Picosecond Times

Athletic amenorrhea.

Configurational Changes of Retinal Schiff Base during Membrane Na + Transport by a Sodium Pumping Rhodopsin

Proton movement and photointermediate kinetics in rhodopsin mutants

Dynamical Correlation Effects on Photoisomerization: Ab Initio Multiple Spawning Dynamics with MS-CASPT2 for a Model Trans-Protonated Schiff Base.

Dynamic Coupling of Tyrosine 185 with the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle, as Revealed by Chemical Shifts, Assisted AF-QM/MM Calculations and Molecular Dynamic Simulations

Tracking of the Molecular Motion in the Primary Event of Photoinduced Reactions of a Phytochromobilin Model

Retinal isomerization in bacteriorhodopsin captured by a femtosecond x-ray laser

Charge transfer characteristics in rhodopsin mimics during photoexcitation

TNF‐α‐induced chemokine production and apoptosis in human neural precursor cells

Nonadiabatic Dynamics with Spin-Flip Vs Linear-Response Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: A Case Study for the Protonated Schiff Base C5H6NH2+

In regards to: Adjuvant radiotherapy after transoral laser microsurgery for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by Pradier et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:1368-1377).