Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Embryonic Stem Cells Are Distinguished by Gene Expression Signatures
Mark H. Chin,Mike J. Mason,Wei Xie,Stefano Volinia,Mike Singer,Cory Peterson,Gayane Ambartsumyan,Otaren Aimiuwu,Laura Richter,Jin Zhang,Ivan Khvorostov,Vanessa Ott,Michael Grunstein,Neta Lavon,Nissim Benvenisty,Carlo M. Croce,Amander T. Clark,Tim Baxter,April D. Pyle,Mike A. Teitell,Matteo Pelegrini,Kathrin Plath,William E. Lowry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.008
IF: 23.9
2009-01-01
Cell Stem Cell
Abstract:Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) outwardly appear to be indistinguishable from embryonic stem cells (ESCs). A study of gene expression profiles of mouse and human ESCs and iPSCs suggests that, while iPSCs are quite similar to their embryonic counterparts, a recurrent gene expression signature appears in iPSCs regardless of their origin or the method by which they were generated. Upon extended culture, hiPSCs adopt a gene expression profile more similar to hESCs; however, they still retain a gene expression signature unique from hESCs that extends to miRNA expression. Genome-wide data suggested that the iPSC signature gene expression differences are due to differential promoter binding by the reprogramming factors. High-resolution array profiling demonstrated that there is no common specific subkaryotypic alteration that is required for reprogramming and that reprogramming does not lead to genomic instability. Together, these data suggest that iPSCs should be considered a unique subtype of pluripotent cell.