Abstract:We apply two approximate solutions of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE) in the mapping representation to the simulation of the laser-induced response of a quantum subsystem coupled to a classical environment. These solutions, known as the Poisson Bracket Mapping Equation (PBME) and the Forward-Backward (FB) trajectory solutions, involve simple algorithms in which the dynamics of both the quantum and classical degrees of freedom are described in terms of continuous variables, as opposed to standard surface-hopping solutions in which the classical degrees of freedom hop between potential energy surfaces dictated by the discrete adiabatic state of the quantum subsystem. The validity of these QCLE-based solutions is tested on a non-trivial electron transfer model involving more than two quantum states, a time-dependent Hamiltonian, strong subsystem-bath coupling, and an initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states that depends on the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling. In particular, we calculate the time-dependent population of the photoexcited donor state in response to an ultrafast, on-resonance pump pulse in a three-state model of an electron transfer complex that is coupled asymmetrically to a bath of harmonic oscillators through the optically dark acceptor state. Within this approach, the three-state electron transfer complex is treated quantum mechanically, while the bath oscillators are treated classically. When compared to the more accurate QCLE-based surface-hopping solution and to the numerically exact quantum results, we find that the PBME solution is not capable of qualitatively capturing the population dynamics, whereas the FB solution is. However, when the subsystem-bath coupling is decreased (which also decreases the initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states) or the initial shift is removed altogether, both the PBME and FB results agree better with the QCLE-based surface-hopping results. These findings highlight the challenges posed by various conditions such as a time-dependent external field, the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling, and the degree of asymmetry on the accuracy of the PBME and FB algorithms. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799272]

Event-by-Event Simulation of a Quantum Eraser Experiment

Event-by-event Simulation of Double-Slit Experiments with Single Photons

Computer Simulation of Wheeler's Delayed-Choice Experiment with Photons

Event-by-event simulation of Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment

A Mesoscopic Quantum Eraser

A Non-Local Quantum Eraser

Corpuscular Model of Two-Beam Interference and Double-Slit Experiments with Single Photons

Computer simulation of Wheeler's delayed choice experiment with

Quantum Erasure With Causally Disconnected Choice

Classical, Quantum and Event-by-Event Simulation of a Stern–Gerlach Experiment with Neutrons

Quantum Dynamical Simulation of a Transversal Stern-Gerlach Interferometer

Quantum erasure based on phase structure

Quantum simulation of electron Coulomb interactions

Event-based simulation of neutron experiments: interference, entanglement and uncertainty relations

A macroscopic delayed-choice quantum eraser using a commercial laser

Quantum Reality Erasure with Spacelike-Separated Operations

A Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Study Of The Population Dynamics In A Model Photo-Induced Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reaction

Simulation of quantum delayed-choice experiment through a single shot

Quantum eraser experiments for the demonstration of entanglement between swift electrons and light

Observations of the delayed-choice quantum eraser using coherent photons

Quantum Simulation of the Dicke-Ising Model via Digital-Analog Algorithms