DTDHM: detection of tandem duplications based on hybrid methods using next-generation sequencing data
Tianting Yuan,Jinxin Dong,Baoxian Jia,Hua Jiang,Zuyao Zhao,Mengjiao Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17748
IF: 3.061
2024-07-26
PeerJ
Abstract:Background: Tandem duplication (TD) is a common and important type of structural variation in the human genome. TDs have been shown to play an essential role in many diseases, including cancer. However, it is difficult to accurately detect TDs due to the uneven distribution of reads and the inherent complexity of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Methods: This article proposes a method called DTDHM (detection of tandem duplications based on hybrid methods), which utilizes NGS data to detect TDs in a single sample. DTDHM builds a pipeline that integrates read depth (RD), split read (SR), and paired-end mapping (PEM) signals. To solve the problem of uneven distribution of normal and abnormal samples, DTDHM uses the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm for multi-feature classification prediction. Then, the qualified split reads and discordant reads are extracted and analyzed to achieve accurate localization of variation sites. This article compares DTDHM with three other methods on 450 simulated datasets and five real datasets. Results: In 450 simulated data samples, DTDHM consistently maintained the highest F1-score. The average F1-score of DTDHM, SVIM, TARDIS, and TIDDIT were 80.0%, 56.2%, 43.4%, and 67.1%, respectively. The F1-score of DTDHM had a small variation range and its detection effect was the most stable and 1.2 times that of the suboptimal method. Most of the boundary biases of DTDHM fluctuated around 20 bp, and its boundary deviation detection ability was better than TARDIS and TIDDIT. In real data experiments, five real sequencing samples (NA19238, NA19239, NA19240, HG00266, and NA12891) were used to test DTDHM. The results showed that DTDHM had the highest overlap density score (ODS) and F1-score of the four methods. Conclusions: Compared with the other three methods, DTDHM achieved excellent results in terms of sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and boundary bias. These results indicate that DTDHM can be used as a reliable tool for detecting TDs from NGS data, especially in the case of low coverage depth and tumor purity samples.