Abstract:Objective: The objective of this review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the findings on built-environment determinants and their relation to participation in different domains of activities, including physical activity, recreational and social activities, and well-being in childhood and adolescence. Introduction: Creating supportive environments for children and adolescents is a priority in society. To ensure informed decision making and policy changes, initiatives need to rely on systematic development and the use of evidence-based knowledge. Thus, it is necessary to critically review the current evidence on the relationship between features of the built environment and health in a more specific and detailed manner to better understand the health-promoting potential of neighborhood built environments. Inclusion criteria: This review included studies on children and adolescents between five and 18 years of age, which examined relationships between one or several neighborhood built-environment determinants and participation in activities and/or well-being. The studies had to report test statistics for associations between built-environment determinants and the outcomes, which means that descriptive cross-sectional studies were not eligible for inclusion. Methods: A four-step search strategy was utilized to identify peer-reviewed studies within six databases. The search was limited to English articles published since January 2010. A data extraction form was developed and used to mine the descriptive details of each included study. The included studies were further assessed for methodological quality by three reviewer pairs independently, using the standard critical appraisal tools from JBI. Due to the methodological heterogeneity of the included studies, a narrative summary of the quantitative findings was conducted. Results: The 127 studies included in the review were mainly cross-sectional (87.4%). The built environment was most extensively studied in relation to the outcomes active travel (n = 54) and unspecified physical activity (n = 46). The evidence suggests that a composite determinant of facilities and amenities is related to more unspecified physical activity. Furthermore, less traffic exposure and more safety features, pedestrian infrastructure for walking and cycling, shorter distances to facilities and greater walkability supported active travel behavior. Fewer studies (n = 11) examined the built-environment determinants of organized sports and well-being, and limited, as well as contradictory, evidence existed for the relationship between the built environment and well-being. Conclusion: The following determinants potentially support active travel behavior: less traffic exposure and more safety features, pedestrian infrastructure for walking and cycling, shorter distances to facilities and greater walkability. A high facility and amenity index might promote unspecified physical activity. Policies and planning processes should consider these determinants to strengthen children's and adolescents' health and well-being. However, there are remaining research gaps and important avenues for future research that need to be addressed before more specific and robust conclusions can be drawn.

Supporting adolescents' leisure time physical activity in low‐income areas: A qualitative systematic review of participant, parent and stakeholder perspectives on family and community interventions

Adolescents' experiences of a school-based health promotion intervention in socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged areas in Sweden: a qualitative process evaluation study

Types of leisure-time physical activity participation in childhood and adolescence, and physical activity behaviours and health outcomes in adulthood: a systematic review

Promoting activity participation and well-being among children and adolescents: a systematic review of neighborhood built-environment determinants

Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Identify Facilitators and Barriers for Parents/Carers to Engage Pre-School Children in Community-Based Opportunities to Be Physically Active

Participatory developed school-based interventions targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour among children and adolescents: A scoping review

A scoping review of physical activity interventions in youth attending child and adolescent mental health services

Motives and Barriers Related to Physical Activity and Sport across Social Backgrounds: Implications for Health Promotion

Physical activity and social support in adolescents: a systematic review

Developing community-based physical activity interventions and recreational programming for children in rural and smaller urban centres: a qualitative exploration of service provider and parent experiences

Leisure-Time Activities Including Children with Special Needs: A Research Overview

Socioecological factors potentially associated with participation in physical activity and sport: A longitudinal study of adolescent girls

What works best when implementing a physical activity intervention for teenagers? Reflections from the ACTIVE Project: a qualitative study

Youths’ Leisure Milieus in Rural Settings – Gender Equality in Utilisation of Leisure Opportunities

Cross-sectional associations between adolescents' physical literacy, sport and exercise participation, and wellbeing

Exploring mediators of accelerometer assessed physical activity in young adolescents in the Health In Adolescents Study - a group randomized controlled trial

Adolescents' physical activity during and beyond the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of young people living in the context of socioeconomic deprivation

Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Physical Activity for Families of Rural Preschoolers Participating in a Motor Skill Program

Future Intentions of Adolescents towards Physical Activity, Sports, and Leisure Practices

Developmental patterns and parental correlates of youth leisure-time physical activity.

Resemblance in Physical Activity in Families with Children in Time Segments during the Week: The Lolland-Falster Health Study