Abstract:Constraint programming (CP) has been recently in the spotlight after new CP-based procedures have been incorporated into state-of-the-art solvers, most notably the CP Optimizer from IBM. Classical CP solvers were only capable of guaranteeing the optimality of a solution, but they could not provide bounds for the integer feasible solutions found if interrupted prematurely due to, say, time limits. New versions, however, provide bounds and optimality guarantees, effectively making CP a viable alternative to more traditional mixed-integer programming (MIP) models and solvers. We capitalize on these developments and conduct a computational evaluation of MIP and CP models on 12 select scheduling problems. 1 We carefully chose these 12 problems to represent a wide variety of scheduling problems that occur in different service and manufacturing settings. We also consider basic and well-studied simplified problems. These scheduling settings range from pure sequencing (e.g., flow shop and open shop) or joint assignment-sequencing (e.g., distributed flow shop and hybrid flow shop) to pure assignment (i.e., parallel machine) scheduling problems. We present MIP and CP models for each variant of these problems and evaluate their performance over 17 relevant and standard benchmarks that we identified in the literature. The computational campaign encompasses almost 6,623 experiments and evaluates the MIP and CP models along five dimensions of problem characteristics, objective function, decision variables, input parameters, and quality of bounds. We establish the areas in which each one of these models performs well and recognize their conceivable reasons. The obtained results indicate that CP sets new limits concerning the maximum problem size that can be solved using off-the-shelf exact techniques. History: Accepted by Pascal Van Hentenryck, Area Editor for Computational Modeling: Methods & Analysis. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2023.1287 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2021.0326 ) at ( http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7541223 ).

Scheduling a Major College Basketball Conference—Revisited

Online Hierarchical Scheduling: an Approach Using Mathematical Programming

Experiences With Scheduling And Mapping Games For Adaptive Distributed Systems: Summary

A note on a sports league scheduling problem

Automated timetabling for small colleges and high schools using huge integer programs

Constraint programming algorithms and models for scheduling applications

Chance Constrained Programming Models for Intelligent Scheduling Problems and Their Efficient Solution

Optimal Time-Abstract Schedulers for CTMDPs and Markov Games

Decomposition, Reformulation, and Diving in University Course Timetabling

Solver Scheduling via Answer Set Programming

Integer programming methods for special college admissions problems

Data Analysis: Generalizations of the Local Approximation Method by Singular Spectrum Analysis

Dynamic Scheduling of E-Sports Tournaments

Scheduling of Network Television Programs

Scheduling Bipartite Tournaments to Minimize Total Travel Distance

A Better Approximation for Bipartite Traveling Tournament in Inter-League Sports Scheduling

A list-scheduling heuristic for the short-term planning of assessment centers

High-Performance Computing for Scheduling Decision Support: A Parallel Depth-First Search Heuristic

Timetable problem using constraint programming

Multivariate Analysis of Scheduling Fair Competitions

Mixed-Integer Programming vs. Constraint Programming for Shop Scheduling Problems: New Results and Outlook