Abstract:Solid-state lithium (Li) metal batteries are widely used due to their excellent safety, superior energy density, and low cost. Nevertheless, the practical application of solid-state Li batteries is hindered by the inferior ionic conductivity of the solid electrolyte and poor interface contact between the electrode and electrolyte. Herein, a flexible, hybrid ceramic-based electrolyte was fabricated by a solution-casting method using poly(vinylidene fluoride), Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 powders, and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide. To realize high ionic conductivity and a stable self-viscous electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact simultaneously, a mixed solution of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, and fluoroethylene carbonate was introduced by the solution-infiltration method. The self-viscous Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 ceramic-based electrolyte exhibits superior ionic conductivity (2.4 × 10–4 S cm–1 at 25 °C), a high ionic transference number (0.42), wide voltage window (4.8 V vs Li/Li+), excellent thermal stabilities, and the ability to impede Li dendrite growth. In particular, the stable contact, low interfacial resistance, and fast ion-transport channels between the electrodes and solid electrolytes can be achieved by the self-viscous interfacial layer. The solid-state LiFePO4|Li battery assembled with the solid self-viscous electrolyte demonstrates a satisfactory initial discharge capacity of 138.0 mAh g–1 and capacity retention of 96.5% after 200 cycles at 0.5 C and under 25 °C. The self-viscous modification strategy of the solid electrolyte affords promising options for implementing the intimate electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact in high-energy-density solid-state batteries.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01202.Figure S1: XRD patterns and SEM image of LATP ceramic powders. Figure S2: Temperature dependence of ionic conductivities for LATP pellets. Figure S3: Flexible and winding performances of self-viscous PLL-LEF electrolyte. Figure S4: Surface morphology of PL and PLL-LEF electrolytes. Figure S5: Adhesiveness exhibitions of PLL-LE composite electrolyte. Figure S6: EIS profiles of 10LiTFSI-40EMITFSI and 10LiTFSI-40EMITFSI-10FEC electrolytes. Figure S7: EIS profiles of stainless steel|PLL-LEF|Li cells. Figure S8: Thermogravimetry curve of PLL-LEF electrolyte. Figure S9: Flammability test of routine Celgard separator. Figure S10: EIS profiles of Li|PLL|Li cell for different aging times. Figure S11: Optical photographs of the PLL electrolyte. Figure S12: Ti 2p XPS of the PLL electrolyte. Figure S13: EIS profiles of Li symmetric cell with different electrolytes after cycling. Figure S14: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells at 0.2 mA·cm–2. Figure S15: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells at 0.5 mA·cm–2. Figure S16: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells. Figure S17: High multiple SEM images of Li surfaces obtained from Li symmetrical cells. Figure S18: SEM image of pristine Li surface. Figure S19: EIS results of LiFePO4|PLL|Li, LiFePO4|PLL-LE|Li and LiFePO4|PLL-LEF|Li batteries. Figure S20: Typical charge–discharge voltage profiles of LiFePO4|PLL-LE|Li cell at 0.5 C. Figure S21: Electrochemical properties of Al2O3@LiNi0.5Co0.3Mn0.3O2|PLL-LEF|Li cell (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Borosilicate Glass-Enabled Antifracture NASICON Solid Electrolytes for Lithium-Metal Batteries

Aqueous Tape Casting Phosphate Ceramic Electrolyte Membrane for High Performance All Solid-State Lithium Metal Battery

Recent Advances in Li1+xAlxTi2−x(PO4)3 Solid-State Electrolyte for Safe Lithium Batteries

Effect of boron-based glass additives on the ionic conductivity of Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 solid electrolyte

Progress and Perspective of Li 1 + X Al X Ti 2 ‐x ( PO 4 ) 3 Ceramic Electrolyte in Lithium Batteries

Effect of addition of LiAlSiO4 on microstructure, phase composition, and electrical properties of Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3–based solid electrolyte

Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 ceramic electrolyte fabricated from bimodal powder precursor

High-performance lithium metal batteries based on composite solid-state electrolytes with high ceramic content

Co-Sintering of Lithium Aluminum Germanium Phosphate (LAGP) Glass/Powder Composite Electrolyte for Multilayer Ceramic Batteries

Asymmetric Solid-State Lithium-Metal-Battery Electrolytes Featuring Na Superionic Conductor-Type Ceramic and Garnet-Type Ceramic Filled Composite Polymer

Stabilizing Ceramic-Based Electrolyte Interfaces with Self-Viscous Modification Strategy for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Impact of Li$_{2.9}$B$_{0.9}$S$_{0.1}$O$_{3.1}$ glass additive on the structure and electrical properties of the LATP-based ceramics

Melt-casted Li1.5Al0.3Mg0.1Ge1.6(PO4)3 glass ceramic electrolytes: A comparative study on the effect of different oxide doping

Hybrid solid state electrolytes blending NASICON-type Li1+xAlxTi2–x(PO4)3 with poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene) for lithium metal batteries

Insight into the Microstructure and Ionic Conductivity of Cold Sintered NASICON Solid Electrolyte for Solid-State Batteries

High Li+ Conductivity of Li1.3+xAl0.3−xMgxTi1.7(PO4)3 with Hybrid Solid Electrolytes for Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Microstructure and ionic conductivities of NASICON-type Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 solid electrolytes produced by cold sintering assisted process

Understanding the Positive Effect of LATP in Polymer Electrolytes in All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Two-step sintering technique of LATP ceramic electrolyte with enhanced key parameters

Stable Li|LAGP Interface Enabled by Confining Solvate Ionic Liquid in a Hyperbranched Polyanionic Copolymer for NASICON-Based Solid-State Batteries

In Situ Gelation of a 1,3-Dioxolane Dual-Permeable Porous Tandem Framework with Excellent Interfacial Stability to Power Long-Cycling Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries