Local Particle Densities and Global Multiplicities in Central Heavy-Ion Interactions at 3.7, 14.6, 60 and 200 A-Gev

EMU0-Collaboration,M. I. Adamovich,M. M. Aggarwal,Y. A. Alexandrov,N. P. Andreeva,Z. V. Anson,R. Arora,F. A. Avetyan,S. K. Badyal,E. Basova,K. B. Bhalla,A. Bhasin,V. S. Bhatia,V. G. Bogdanov,V. I. Bubnov,T. H. Burnett,X. Cai,I. Y. Chasnikov,L. P. Chernova,M. M. Chernyavsky,G. Z. Eligbaeva,L. E. Eremenko,A. S. Gaitinov,E. R. Ganssauge,S. Garpman,S. G. Gerassimov,J. Grote,K. G. Gulamov,S. K. Gupta,V. K. Gupta,H. H. Heckman,H. Huang,B. Jakobsson,B. Judek,L. Just,S. Kachroo,G. S. Kalyachkina,E. K. Kanygina,M. Karabova,G. L. Kaul,S. Kitroo,S. P. Kharlamov,S. A. Krasnov,S. Kulikova,V. Kumar,P. Lal,V. G. Larionova,V. N. Lepetan,L. S. Liu,S. Lokanathan,J. Lord,N. S. Lukicheva,S. B. Luo,T. N. Maksimkina,L. K. Mangotra,N. A. Marutyan,N. V. Maslennikova,I. S. Mittra,S. Mookerjee,H. Nasrulaeva,S. H. Nasyrov,V. S. Navotny,J. Nystrand,G. I. Orlova,I. Otterlund,H. S. Palsania,N. G. Peresadko,N. V. Petrov,V. A. Plyushchev,D. A. Qarshiev,W. Y. Qian,Y. M. Qin,R. Raniwala,S. Raniwala,N. K. Rao,V. M. Rappoport,J. T. Rhee,N. Saidkhanov,N. A. Salmanova,L. G. Sarkisova,V. R. Sarkisyan,G. S. Shabratova,T. I. Shakhova,S. N. Shpilev,D. Skelding,K. Söderström,Z. I. Solovjeva,E. Stenlund,E. L. Surin,L. N. Svechnikova,K. D. Tolstov,M. Tothova,M. I. Tretyakova,T. P. Trofimova,U. Tuleeva,S. Vokal,H. Q. Wang,Z. Q. Weng,R. J. Wilkes,Y. L. Xia,G. F. Xu,D. H. Zhang,P. Y. Zheng,S. I. Zhochova,D. C. Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01474723
1992-01-01
Abstract:The energy and centrality dependence of local particle pseudorapidity densities as well as validity of various parametrizations of the distributions are examined. The dispersion, σ, of the rapidity density distribution of produced particles varies slowly with centrality and is 0.80, 0.98, 1.21 and 1.41 for central interactions at 3.7, 14.6, 60 and 200A GeV incident energy, respectively, σ is found to be independent of the size of the interacting system at fixed energy. A novel way of representing the window dependence of the multiplicity as normalized variance versus inverse average multiplicity is outlined.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?