Abstract:Study Design. A prospective clinical magnetic resonance imaging study. Objective. To explore the differences in the position of the aorta relative to the spine in patients with single right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (RT-AIS) in 2 different body positions (supine and prone). Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screws are used widely in scoliosis surgery. With an increase in the incidence of vascular complications that result from misplaced pedicle screws, studies regarding the spatial relationship of the aorta and the vertebral body have also gradually increased and show that the aorta is positioned more posteriorly in patients with RT-AIS than in normal subjects. In these imaging studies, the patients received computed tomographic or magnetic resonance (MR) scans in the supine position. Recent studies of subjects without a spinal deformity found that the aorta moves from a posterolateral to an anteromedial position when the subject changes from a supine position to a prone position. However, no studies investigated aorta shifting with changing body position in patients with AIS. Methods. Twenty-six patients with single RT-AIS were recruited into this study. Each patient received an axial MR scan from T5 through L3 in both the supine and prone positions. In the Cartesian coordinate system, the left pedicle-aorta (LtP-Ao) angle, LtP-Ao distance, and vertebral rotation angle were measured from T5 through L3 in the axial plane MR images. We also simulated misplacement of the pedicle screw with commonly used length and 20° direction error, and the potential risk of aorta impingement was defined as the virtual pedicle screw crossing the aorta. The paired sample t test was used to compare these parameters between the 2 body positions. Results. The mean LtP-Ao angle and mean LtP-Ao distance differed between the body positions at each level. At the T5–T10 levels, the patients in the prone position exhibited significantly smaller LtP-Ao angles (26.2° vs. 38.8°; P, 0.01) and distances (27.0 vs. 30.7 mm; P, 0.01) than those in the supine position. The vertebral rotation angle was larger in the prone position than in the supine position at periapical levels, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P . 0.05). The percentage of potential risk of aorta impingement was significantly higher in the prone position than in the supine position at the T5–T10 levels (19.7% vs. 6.6%, respectively; P, 0.05). Conclusion. The aorta shifts more anteromedially and more closely to the spine at the T5–T10 levels when patients with RT-AIS change from the supine to the prone position. Thus, in the prone position, the aorta is potentially at a higher risk for injury from anterior and lateral cortex penetration by the left pedicle screws. The spinal surgeon should be aware of these altered conditions to avoid injury to the aorta during pedicle screw insertion in patients with RT-AIS who are in the prone position.

Different Potential Risk of Injury from Thoracic Pedicle Screw Insertion Between Left and Right Main-Stem Bronchus in Lenke 1 Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Morpho-metrological Study of Thoracical Verterbral Pedicle Rib Unit and Thoracical Pedicle on CT Scans

The Potential Risk of Left Subclavian Artery Injury from Excessively Long Thoracic Pedicle Screws Placed in the Proximal Thoracic Regions of Lenke Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients and Normal Teenagers: an Anatomical Study

Influence of Prone Positioning on Potential Risk of Aorta Injury from Pedicle Screw Misplacement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

Risk Evaluation on Aorta Injury Caused by Misplacement of Thoracic Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Potential Risk of Thoracic Aorta Injury from Excessively Long Right Pedicle Screws in Patients with Left Thoracic Scoliosis: A Computed Tomography Image Study

How is the trachea at risk of injury from pedicle screw insertion in proximal thoracic curve of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?

The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis

The Azygos Vein is at Potential Risk of Injury from Malpositioning of Left Thoracic Pedicle Screw in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

Different proximal thoracic curve patterns have different relative positions of esophagus to spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study.

The Position of the Aorta Changes with Altered Body Position in Single Right Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study

The Risks of Aorta Impingement from Pedicle Screw May Increase Due to Aorta Movement During Posterior Instrumentation in Lenke 5C Curve: a Computed Tomography Study

Accuracy of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Using the Entry Point Identified by New Landmarks: a Computed Tomography Study

The potential risk of spinal cord injury from pedicle screw at the apex of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation

Anatomical Characteristics of Thoracic Vertebrae for Safe Pedicle Screw Placement：comparison Between Normal Adolescents and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

The Anatomical Relationship Between the Aorta and the Thoracic Vertebral Bodies and Its Importance in the Placement of the Screw in Thoracoscopic Correction of Scoliosis

Entry angle for thoracic pedicle screw in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The Morphological Abnormalities of Pedicles and Spinal Canal in the Apical Region of Adolescent Idiopathic Thoracic Scoliosis

The changes of relative position of the aorta after posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis

Classification of Thoracic Pedicle According to the Transverse Diameters in Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients and Its Clinical Significance