Abstract:Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Ahead of Print. The majority of intimate partner violence (IPV) research is unidirectional, focusing on IPV use (i.e., perpetration) or experience (i.e., victimization). However, when IPV use and experience data are simultaneously included in analyses, bidirectional IPV often emerges as a common IPV pattern. The objective of this study was to examine patterns of IPV use and experience, risk factors that may be associated with these patterns, and potential gender differences within a sample of post-9/11 Veterans. This study included a national sample of post-9/11 Veterans (N = 1,150; 50.3% women) who completed self-report measures at two timepoints. We performed a latent class analysis (LCA) to determine the appropriate number of IPV classes, conducted sensitivity analyses, and examined factors potentially associated with IPV class membership. We identified three distinct classes of IPV: Low to no IPV, Bidirectional Psychological IPV, and Bidirectional Multiform IPV. Men and women reported similar rates of IPV use and experience, and there were no gender differences in the LCA model. However, race and ethnicity, employment status, children in the household, marital status, child abuse or witnessing family violence, lifetime physical assault, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and binge drinking were differentially associated with class membership. This study extends existing knowledge on patterns of IPV among Veterans and factors associated with these patterns. Bidirectional IPV was the most common IPV pattern, underscoring the importance of examining IPV use and experience concurrently within research and clinical samples, and developing comprehensive IPV screening and treatment strategies that incorporate bidirectional IPV in work to advance relationship health and safety among Veterans.

Patterns of Technology-Based Abuse Among Adult Intimate Partner Violence Survivors and Associations with Offline Abuse

Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Intimate Relationships: A Scoping Review

Technology-Based Abuse: Intimate Partner Violence and the Use of Information Communication Technologies

Intersections of Stalking and Technology-Based Abuse: Emerging Definitions, Conceptualization, and Measurement

The Abuse of Technology in Domestic Violence and Stalking

The Victim-Offender Overlap in Technology-Facilitated Abuse: Nationally Representative Findings Among U.S. Young Adults

Technology-Facilitated Domestic and Sexual Violence: A Review

Heterogeneity in College Student's Technology-Facilitated Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Occurring Post-Breakup: A Latent Profile Analysis

Insecure Attachment, Maladaptive Personality Traits, and the Perpetration of In-Person and Cyber Psychological Abuse

Single, Repeat, and Poly Intimate Partner Violence Victimization among Women at a College Campus: Extending Research Through the Inclusion of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Examining Key Social Determinants for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention

Give me your password! What are you hiding? Associated factors of intimate partner violence through technological abuse

Technology as a Weapon in Domestic Violence: Responding to Digital Coercive Control

Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Among Veterans: A Latent Class Analysis

Advocate and Survivor Perspectives on the Role of Technology in Help Seeking and Services with Emerging Adults in Higher Education

Cyber dating abuse: prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression

Exploring the Existence of Distinct Subclasses of Intimate Partner Violence Experience and Associations with Mental Health

Unveiling the traumatic impact of cyber dating abuse and offline intimate partner violence: exploring the mediating role of adult attachment

Technology-Facilitated Abuse Among College Students: Prevalence and Consequences, and Examinations by Gender and Sexual Identity

In-Person and Cyber Dating Abuse: A Longitudinal Investigation

A New Frontier: The Development and Validation of the Intimate Partner Cyber Abuse Instrument

Technology facilitated coercive control: domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms