Intermittent preventive treatment regimens for malaria in HIV-positive pregnant women
Clara Pons-Duran,Myrte J Wassenaar,Koffi Emmanuel Yovo,Clara Marín-Carballo,Valérie Briand,Raquel González
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006689.pub3
IF: 8.4
2024-09-27
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract:Malaria and HIV infection overlap geographically in sub‐Saharan Africa and share risk factors. HIV infection increases malaria's severity, especially in pregnant women. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine (SP) for pregnant women living in areas of stable malaria transmission. However, HIV‐positive women on daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (recommended for prevention of opportunistic infections in people with HIV) cannot receive SP due to adverse drug interactions, so malaria prevention in this vulnerable population currently relies on daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis alone. This review is based on a new protocol and provides an update to the 2011 Cochrane Review that evaluated alternative drugs for IPTp to prevent malaria in HIV‐positive women. To compare the safety and efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment regimens for malaria prevention in HIV‐positive pregnant women. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two trial registries to 31 January 2024. To identify relevant additional studies or unpublished work, we checked references and contacted study authors and other researchers working on malaria and HIV. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any intermittent preventive treatment regimen for preventing malaria in HIV‐positive pregnant women against daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis alone, placebo, current or previous standard of care, or combinations of these options. By 'standard of care' we refer to the country's recommended drug regimen to prevent malaria in pregnancy among HIV‐positive women, or the treatment that a trial's research team considered to be the standard of care. Review authors, in pairs, independently screened all records identified by the search strategy, applied inclusion criteria, assessed risk of bias in included trials, and extracted data. We contacted trial authors when additional information was required. We presented dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios (RRs), count outcomes as incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs). We presented all measures of effect with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach for what we considered to be the main comparisons and outcomes. We included 14 RCTs, with a total of 4976 HIV‐positive pregnant women initially randomized. All trials assessed the efficacy and safety of one antimalarial used as IPTp (mefloquine, dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine, SP, or azithromycin) with or without daily cotrimoxazole, compared to daily cotrimoxazole alone, placebo, or a standard of care regimen. We grouped the trials into nine comparisons. Our main comparison evaluated the current standard of care (daily cotrimoxazole) with another drug regimen (mefloquine or dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine) versus daily cotrimoxazole with or without placebo. In this comparison, two trials evaluated mefloquine and three evaluated dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine. We conducted meta‐analyses that included trials evaluating dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine plus cotrimoxazole, and trials that evaluated mefloquine plus cotrimoxazole, as we considered there to be no qualitative or quantitative heterogeneity among trials for most outcomes. We considered drug‐related adverse events and HIV‐related outcomes to be drug‐specific. Daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis plus another drug regimen (mefloquine or dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine) probably results in lower risk of maternal peripheral parasitaemia at delivery (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95; 2406 participants, 5 trials; moderate‐certainty evidence). It results in little or no difference in maternal anaemia cases at delivery (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; 2417 participants, 3 trials; high‐certainty evidence). It probably results in a decrease in placental malaria measured by blood smear (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.93; 1337 participants, 3 trials; moderate‐certainty evidence), and probably results in little or no difference in low birth weight (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.41; 2915 participants, 5 trials; moderate‐certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to ascertain whether daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis plus another drug regimen affects the risk of cord blood parasitaemia (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.64; 2696 participants, 5 trials; very low‐certainty evidence). Daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis plus another drug regimen probably results in little or no difference in foetal loss (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.46; 2957 participants, 5 trials; moderate‐certainty evidence), and may result in little or no difference in neonatal mortality (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.14; 2706 participants, 4 trials; low‐certainty evidence). Due to the probability of an increased risk of mother‐to‐child HIV transmission and some adverse drug effects noted with mefloquine, we also -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal