Abstract:Plant Biotechnology JournalVolume 18, Issue 11 p. 2161-2163 Brief CommunicationOpen Access Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based plant genomic fragment deletions by microhomology-mediated end joining Jiantao Tan, Jiantao Tan State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYanchang Zhao, Yanchang Zhao State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorBin Wang, Bin Wang State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYu Hao, Yu Hao State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYaxi Wang, Yaxi Wang State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYangyang Li, Yangyang Li State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, College of Horticulture and Landscape, Southwest University, Chongqing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWanni Luo, Wanni Luo State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWubei Zong, Wubei Zong State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorGousi Li, Gousi Li State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorShuifu Chen, Shuifu Chen State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKun Ma, Kun Ma State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXianrong Xie, Xianrong Xie State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLetian Chen, Letian Chen orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-636X State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYao-Guang Liu, Corresponding Author Yao-Guang Liu ygliu@scau.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-2997 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China Correspondence (Tel +86 20 85281908; fax +86 20 85282180; email zhuql@scau.edu.cn (QZ); ygliu@scau.edu.cn (Y-GL))Search for more papers by this authorQinlong Zhu, Corresponding Author Qinlong Zhu zhuql@scau.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-6450 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China Correspondence (Tel +86 20 85281908; fax +86 20 85282180; email zhuql@scau.edu.cn (QZ); ygliu@scau.edu.cn (Y-GL))Search for more papers by this author Jiantao Tan, Jiantao Tan State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYanchang Zhao, Yanchang Zhao State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorBin Wang, Bin Wang State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYu Hao, Yu Hao State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYaxi Wang, Yaxi Wang State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYangyang Li, Yangyang Li State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, College of Horticulture and Landscape, Southwest University, Chongqing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWanni Luo, Wanni Luo State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWubei Zong, Wubei Zong State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorGousi Li, Gousi Li State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorShuifu Chen, Shuifu Chen State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKun Ma, Kun Ma State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXianrong Xie, Xianrong Xie State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLetian Chen, Letian Chen orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-636X State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYao-Guang Liu, Corresponding Author Yao-Guang Liu ygliu@scau.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-2997 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China Correspondence (Tel +86 20 85281908; fax +86 20 85282180; email zhuql@scau.edu.cn (QZ); ygliu@scau.edu.cn (Y-GL))Search for more papers by this authorQinlong Zhu, Corresponding Author Qinlong Zhu zhuql@scau.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-6450 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangzhou, China Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China Correspondence (Tel +86 20 85281908; fax +86 20 85282180; email zhuql@scau.edu.cn (QZ); ygliu@scau.edu.cn (Y-GL))Search for more papers by this author First published: 26 April 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13390Citations: 17AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas) systems produce double-strand breaks (DSBs) in targeted sites and generally cause insertion/deletions of one or several bases by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)-mediated DNA repair. However, many edited cell lines with small insertions/deletions produce abnormal transcripts or proteins causing unexpected effects that complicate functional analysis (Tuladhar et al., 2019). Therefore, the ability to delete larger genomic fragments would have advantage for making true null alleles of coding and non-coding genes. The NHEJ pathway also produces fragment deletion with low efficiency (Pathak et al., 2019). Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) is another DNA repair mechanism based on recombination between microhomologous sequences (MHSs) of 4–25 bp located near DSBs (Decottignies, 2007). Studies in model organisms including plants showed that MMEJ usually results in deletions of sequences between pairs of MHSs near DSBs generated by genome editing (Pathak et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2017). The MMEJ approach has been explored for deletion or insertion of genomic fragments in animals and microorganisms (Bae et al., 2014; Nakade et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016), but this type of application as well as systematic investigation of the frequency of MMEJ events in plant genome editing is lacking. In addition, generation of fragment deletions could remove antibiotic or herbicide selectable marker genes from transgenic lines for minimizing public and regulatory concerns. Several strategies for obtaining marker-free transgenic plants have been reported (Perez and Angenon, 2013), but these methods require the use of a marker-free system for plant transformation. Therefore, a high-efficiency method for removing target DNA fragments in plants is needed. Here, we analysed the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-targeted deletion of genomic fragments mediated by MMEJ in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and demonstrated this approach as an effective tool for deleting marker genes from transgenic plants. Using the CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex genome editing system for plants (Ma et al., 2015), our laboratory produced hundreds of rice mutant lines. A proportion of these lines were edited at two or more sites within the target genes. Although we did not consider MHSs for MMEJ in our initial experimental design, we selected 48 edited populations (each representing a group of T0 plants generated with the same CRISPR/Cas9 construct) that had fragment deletions between the target sites, and determined whether some deletion events were mediated by MMEJ (two MHS sites recombined as one in the deletion junctions) or by NHEJ (no MHSs in the deletion junctions). Of these edited populations, 24 had MMEJ-mediated fragment deletions ranging from 28 to 20 667 bp with an average size of 1653 bp. The average fragment deletion efficiency was 18.9% (Figure 1a). Moreover, 43 edited populations had NHEJ-mediated deletions ranging from 25 to 21 000 bp with an average size of 948 bp. Thus, if the design of editing targets does not consider facilitating MMEJ, the frequencies of fragment deletions induced by MMEJ and NHEJ are similar, but the sizes of MMEJ-mediated deletions are somewhat larger. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint CRISPR/Cas9-based genomic fragment deletion through MMEJ pathway. (a) Comparison of frequencies of genomic fragment deletions mediated by MMEJ and NHEJ in rice. An edited population stands a group of T0 individuals transformed with the same construct, which contains a proportion of MMEJ- or NHEJ-mediated fragment deletion events or proportions of the both events. Forty-eight such edited populations with fragment deletions were analysed, and 19 of them had both MMEJ- and NHEJ-mediated fragment deletions. (b) Schematic diagram for the T-DNA insertion in a MST3-transgenic rice line, showing the designed target sites (T1–T3) and the MHSs (sites of the same group are shown in the same colour). (c) The sequences flanking the HPT cassette, indicating the MHSs and target sites, and the Cas9-cutting positions (blue arrows). The Pf/Pr primer pair was used to detect fragment deletions. (d) Positive retransformed plants were confirmed by PCR to amplify the HPT, Bar and Cas9 genes. A plant indicated with a triangle had a truncated T-DNA with a deletion of Cas9 (but retaining the Bar gene). PCR using the Pf/Pr primer pair detected the excision of the HPT cassette in a homozygous state (ho△, with one smaller band), a heterozygous state (he△, with two bands) and non-deletion (with one large band). (e) Sequencing chromatograms showing four types of the deletion-junction events in 11 MMEJ-edited plants. Note that after cutting by Cas9 (c), MHS4 (a) had 3 bp in size. (f) A summary of the efficiencies of the marker gene deletion by MMEJ and NHEJ. The edited HPT-excision plants by MMEJ (11 plants) and NHEJ (3 plants) are indicated. We next attempted to induce MMEJ to delete a marker gene from an existing transgenic line. We previously generated a transgenic line carrying a homozygous, single-copy T-DNA insertion of a transgene carrying MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSFERASE 3 (MST3). The MST3 transgene was in a pCAMBIA1300-based binary construct with the hygromycin-resistance (HPT) gene cassette (Figure 1b). To delete this HPT cassette using genome editing, we first determined the sequences flanking the T-DNA insertion by the modified high-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (mhiTAIL-PCR) (Tan et al., 2019). We then used our online microhomology-finder tool (http://skl.scau.edu.cn/repfinder/) to analyse the sequences flanking the HPT cassette in the T-DNA and the inserted genome to identify MHSs. This analysis identified four groups of MHSs (MHS1–4) of 5–7 bp in the flanking sequences (Figure 1b,c). To produce DSBs as close as possible to the MHSs for efficient MMEJ-mediated fragment deletion, we used the web-based tool CRISPR-GE (http://skl.scau.edu.cn/) to design three target sites (T1–T3) that were located near any pair of the MHSs, including two target sites on the genomic flanking sequence and one target site on the T-DNA flanking sequence (Figure 1b,c). To induce DSBs at the target sites, we prepared a binary construct with three single-guide RNA (sgRNA) expression cassettes for the target sites based on the pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-B vector with the glyphosate selectable marker gene Bar as described (Ma et al., 2015) and used it to retransform this transgenic line (Figure 1b,c). We obtained 21 Cas9-positive T0 plants as confirmed by PCR (Figure 1d). PCR with a Pf/Pr primer pair (Figure 1b,c) detected 3 plants (#1, #8 and #15) with homozygous deletion (ho△) and 11 plants (#3–#5, #9, #11, #14 and #17–#21) with heterozygous deletion (he△) (Figure 1d). To further determine whether these deletions were mediated by MMEJ or NHEJ, we examined the deletion-junction sequences. To this end, all the PCR-amplified fragments with reduced sizes and full length (Figure 1d) were recovered and sequenced. In the three ho△ plants, the HPT cassette was precisely excised with deletion-junction events between the pair of MHS1, MHS2 or MHS3 (Figure 1e,f). Of the 11 he△ plants, 8 had deletion-junction events between pair of MHS1, MHS 2 or MHS 4 (Figure 1f). The remaining 3 he△ plants (#3, #5 and #9) had fragment deletions generated by NHEJ, with junction sites between the targeted non-homologous DSB ends. In these he△ plants, sequencing of the full-length fragments showed the presence of the HPT cassette but with various base insertion/deletion mutations at the three targeted sites. In total, 3/21 (14.3%) of the edited plants had a homozygous marker gene deletion by MMEJ, and 11/21 (52.4%, including 8 plants by MMEJ and 3 plants by NHEJ) underwent mono-allelic (heterozygous) gene deletion (Figure 1f). Our results demonstrate that by designing suitable target sites near MHSs (see below), the efficiency of MMEJ-mediated fragment deletion is much higher than that of NHEJ-mediated deletions. In addition, we obtained marker-free T1 plants derived from the ho△ #1, #8 and #15 plants, which had no HPT and the T-DNA (containing the CRISPR/Cas9 components and Bar) removed by genetic segregation. Although studies have reported genomic fragment deletions by CRISPR/Cas systems, the efficiency is not high. The MMEJ pathway is active during cell cycle, which provides more chances for DSB repair than the other DNA repair pathways (Shen et al., 2017). Our results suggest that three factors may be related to the efficiency of genomic deletion using MMEJ-assisted CRISPR/Cas editing. First, the MHS1 and MHS4 sites, which are closer to the targeted sites (Figure 1c), had higher efficiency (in total 8/21) than that of the other two MHSs (in total 3/21, Figure 1f). It seems that the closer the MHSs are to the DSB positions, the higher the fragment deletion efficiency will be. Second, the length of MHSs may be less important than their positions relative to the DSBs; for example, MHS3 has the longest size (7 bp) but it produced only one he△ plant. Therefore, a MHS size of 4–5 bp (or even 3 bp, such as MHS4(a)) is sufficient for efficient MMEJ-mediated DNA repair. Third, production of multiple DSBs using multiplex sgRNAs may increase the frequency of genomic fragment deletions. In conclusion, the high-efficiency genomic fragment deletion strategy using MMEJ-assisted CRISPR/Cas9 editing is flexible in target design for many genomic regions to remove targeted genomic fragments. Moreover, this approach can facilitate functional genomics research and genetic improvement of organisms. Acknowledgements We thank Zhe Zhao, Dongchang Zeng, Yaling Zhang and Jingluan Han in our laboratory for providing part of the genome editing data for analysis. This work was supported by grants from the Major Program of Guangdong Basic and Applied Research (2019B030302006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971915; 31771740) and the Guangdong special support programme of young top-notch talent in science and technology innovation (2019TQ05N147). Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Author contributions Y.-G.L. and Q.Z. designed the studies. J.T., Y.Z., B.W., Y.H., Y.W., Y.L., W.L., W.Z., G.L., S.C., K.M. and X.X. performed the experiments. J.T., L.C., Q.Z. and Y.-G.L. analysed data. Q.Z., Y.-G.L. and J.T. wrote the paper. References Bae, S., Kweon, J., Kim, H.S. and Kim, J.-S. (2014) Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat. Methods, 11, 705– 706. Decottignies, A. (2007) Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics, 176, 1403– 1415. Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, Q., Liu, W., Chen, Y., Qiu, R., Wang, B. et al. (2015) A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant, 8, 1274– 1284. Nakade, S., Tsubota, T., Sakane, Y., Kume, S., Sakamoto, N., Obara, M., Daimon, T. et al. (2014) Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat. Commun. 5, 5560. Pathak, B., Zhao, S., Manoharan, M. and Srivastava, V. (2019) Dual-targeting by CRISPR/Cas9 leads to efficient point mutagenesis but only rare targeted deletions in the rice genome. 3 Biotech. 9, 158. Perez, B.C. and Angenon, G. (2013) Strategies for generating marker-free transgenic plants. Genetic Engineering. 10, 5772– 55573. Shen, H., Strunks, G.D., Klemann, B.J., Hooykaas, P.J. and de Pater, S. (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-strand break repair in Arabidopsis nonhomologous end-joining mutants. G3. 7, 193– 202. Tan, J., Gong, Q., Yu, S., Hou, Y., Zeng, D., Zhu, Q. and Liu, Y.-G. (2019) A modified high-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR method for amplifying long unknown flanking sequences. J. Genet. Genomics, 46, 363– 366. Tuladhar, R., Yeu, Y., Piazza, J.T., Tan, Z., Clemenceau, J.R., Wu, X., Barrett, Q. et al. (2019) CRISPR/Cas9-based mutagenesis frequently provokes on-target mRNA misregulation. Nat. Commun. 10, 4056. Zhang, C., Meng, X., Wei, X. and Lu, L. (2016) Highly efficient CRISPR mutagenesis by microhomology-mediated end joining in Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 86, 47– 57. Citing Literature Volume18, Issue11November 2020Pages 2161-2163 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation

Abstract:This Special Issue presents four papers originally presented at the Second International Symposium on Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, convened in Chengde, China, during July 2009. This Chinese Symposium series is growing in international recognition, with attendees from the United States, Japan and elsewhere. The papers in this issue are selected to showcase the broad range of insect science in China. China is emerging as a world leader in investment in science and in scientific publications, including insect science. The latest available Science and Technology Statistics Data Book (2007; produced each year by the Ministry of Science and Technology) tells an exciting story. In 2006 China was second only to the USA in papers indexed by SCI, EI and ISTP and was first globally in numbers of Research and Development personnel. In our arena of insect science, China is now abreast of Japan, and working to catch up with the United States. Both the numbers of patents applied for and numbers of patents granted increased by approximately sixfold in the decade 1996–2006. The numbers of overseas Chinese students nearly doubled from 2001 to 2006 while the numbers of returnees almost quadrupled. Gross spending on research and development has tripled from 2001 to 2006; during China's highest rate of economic growth, gross spending on research and development as a proportion of the gross domestic product also increased. Funding devoted to science increased by 8% in 2010. Although only a small proportion of the total funds is devoted to agriculture, as seen in virtually all advanced nations, investment in agriculture and insect science is growing apace. These trends are likely to continue into the foreseeable future. Most important, the outlook for insect science at the global level is very bright. In this issue, Su-Fen Bai and colleagues in Xue-Xin Chen's laboratory report on interspecific competition between two endoparasitoids, Cotesia vestalis and Oomyzus sololowskii, within their common host, larvae of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Multiparasitism is the common term for the occasions when eggs of both species are placed in the same larva. Usually only one parasitoid species survives these situations due to competition between them. In this system, C. vestalis is the stronger competitor and Bai et al. report on the mechanisms accounting for this outcome. Zhan et al. in Qili Feng's group report on a midgut-specific chymotrypsin in larvae of the Oriental leafworm moth (also the tobacco cutworm), Spodoptera litura. Moving beyond the standard cloning, the authors draw on several approaches to show that the protein is expressed mainly in the midgut. In their studies of the insect endocrine gland, the prothoracic gland, Ju-Ling Lin and Shi-Hong Gu report that prothoracicotropic hormone stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of at least two proteins in the gland. One of these proteins is a key component of an intracellular signaling pathway that helps understand how prothoracicotroic hormone influences production of ecdysterioid in Bombyx mori. Finally, moving beyond insects, X-W Zhang and colleagues in Jin-Xing Wang's group introduce a new C-type lectin discovered in the red crayfish, Procambarus clarkia. They cloned the gene encoding the lectin and used recombinant lectin to show that the lectin binds to specific membrane components of bacteria, but does not by itself cause agglutination. The authors concluded that the crayfish C-type lectin is a pattern recognition receptor, involved in immune surveillance for infection. It is our pleasure to present this Special Issue of AIBP, drawn from the International Symposium in Chengde. This symposium was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30910303030) and Hebei Normal University. The Third International Symposium on Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology will meet in Shanghai during July 2011. The following pages reprint the First Announcement of the upcoming Symposium. The 3rd International Symposium on Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IPBMB) will be held from July 2nd–6th, 2011, in Shanghai. As a major forum for the exchange of multidisciplinary research in insect science, IPBMB will attract 200–250 scientists, including faculty, post-doctoral scientists and graduate students. Some most active scientists in the field will be invited to give plenary speeches. The symposium is structured into four major components: one, plenary sessions with keynote speeches and special reports; two, thematic symposia; three, pre-congress workshops; and four, vendor exhibitions. Papers selected from the symposium will be considered for publication in Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology and Insect Science. Please look to our Website for the Second-Round Announcement early in 2011. 1. Organization Sponsors and Organizing Institutions Professional Committee of Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Entomological Society of China Key Laboratory of Insect Development and Evolution, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences College of Life Sciences, East China Normal University Academic Committee Organizing Committee 2. Major Theme Insect Development and Insect Genetics. 3. Language The official language of the symposium is English. 4. Topics (1) Academic Topics and Contacts (2) Sightseeing With a history of more than 900 years, Zhouzhuang is an ancient city, about 25 miles west of Shanghai. There are many water townships in China and Zhouzhuang, called the “Venice of the East,” is the most famous. Zhouzhuang is noted for its profound cultural background, well-preserved ancient residential houses (for examples, Shen House, Zhang House, Milou Tower), and elegant watery views from ancient bridges (Fu'an Bridge and the Twin Bridges to name a couple of them). 5. Time and Venue (1) Time: The conference will be held from July 2nd to 6th, 2011. (2) Venue: East China Normal University (Yifu Building, East China Normal University, Jinshajiang Road, Shanghai). 6. Registration Registration deadline: April 30, 2011. Please send the registration form before the deadline. Registration fee: $300/participant. Meals are included. The financial instruments to pay registration fee will be announced in our Website early in 2011. 7. Abstracts Abstracts (one page research summaries) should contain only new and unpublished material and must be submitted electronically by the abstract deadline, May 31st, 2011. Presenting authors may submit abstracts for consideration as talks and/or posters. The format of the abstract refers to Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, within 1000 words. 8. Schedule 9. Communication Multi-media devices will be available to speakers. Please mark the form of the communication in the registration form and send it to ipbmb@sibs.ac.cn by E-mail before May 31th, 2011. 10. Hotel Accommodation Yifu Hotel: ∼¥400 (∼$60)/standard room, on the East China Normal University campus http://lxs.ecnu.edu.cn/NewsPage.php?138&ID=349 Tel: 021-62601058 Jinjiang Hotel: ∼¥200 (∼$30)/standard room, about ten minutes walk. Please check our Website in early 2011 for specific information on hotels. 11. Website—Under construction http://www.go-to-ocea.org/home http://www.sippe.ac.cn 12. Available Contacts The registration form and the abstract should be submitted by E-mail to Jing Meng or Lin Jiao at the following address: E-mail: ipbmb@sibs.ac.cn Tel: Jing Meng 021-54924046(O); 18918100867(C) Lin Jiao 021-54924164(O); 13817651625 (C) Professional Committee of Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Entomological Society of China Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences College of Life Science, East China Normal University December 1st, 2010 *Please fill in the following form and send it back to the conference secretariat by E-mail to the following address: ipbmb@sippe.ac.cn

Ethylene Biology Blooms from Fundamental Research to Postharvest Applications

Regulation of Ethylene Biosynthesis and Signaling by Protein Kinases and Phosphatases.

Molecular Mechanisms on Ethylene Regulation of Nutrient Deficiency Stress Responses in Plants

Efficient CRISPR/Cas9‐based Plant Genomic Fragment Deletions by Microhomology‐mediated End Joining

The ethylene signaling pathway: new insights

Advances in the Action of Plant Hormone Ethylene

Molecular Environmental Soil Science at the Interfaces in the Earth’s Critical Zone

Molecular Basis of the Ethylene Signaling and Response Pathway in Arabidopsis

GUANGZHOU-PREFACE.

Papers Selected from the Second International Symposium on Insect Physiology

Progress of Ethylene Action Mechanism and Its Application on Plant Type Formation in Crops

Study of Ethylene Signal Transduction Pathway

Diverse Roles of Ethylene in Regulating Agronomic Traits in Rice

Ethylene signaling and regulation in plant growth and stress responses

Ethylene induces combinatorial effects of histone H3 acetylation in gene expression in Arabidopsis

Genetic Basis of Ethylene Perception and Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis

[Research Progress of Ethylene Signal Transduction in Plants].

Ethylene in fruits: beyond ripening control

Ethylene Treatment in Studying Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis.

Ethylene signaling in rice and Arabidopsis: New regulators and mechanisms.

Effects of Overproduced Ethylene on the Contents of Other Phytohormones and Expression of Their Key Biosynthetic Genes