Facet Energy and Reactivity Versus Cytotoxicity: the Surprising Behavior of CdS Nanorods

Lu Liu,Meiqing Sun,Haijun Zhang,Qilin Yu,Mingchun Li,Yu Qi,Chengdong Zhang,Guandao Gao,Yingjin Yuan,Huanhuan Zhai,Wei Chen,Pedro J. J. Alvarez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04487

IF: 10.8

2015-01-01

Nano Letters

Abstract:Responsible development of nanotechnology calls for improved understanding of how nanomaterial surface energy and reactivity affect potential toxicity. Here, we challenge the paradigm that cytotoxicity increases with nanoparticle reactivity. Higher-surface-energy {001}-faceted CdS nanorods (CdS-H) were less toxic to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than lower-energy ({101}-faceted) nanorods (CdS-L) of similar morphology, aggregate size, and charge. CdS-H adsorbed to the yeast's cell wall to a greater extent than CdS-L, which decreased endocytosis and cytotoxicity. Higher uptake of CdS-L decreased cell viability and increased endoplasmatic reticulum stress despite lower release of toxic Cd(2+) ions. Higher toxicity of CdS-L was confirmed with five different unicellular microorganisms. Overall, higher-energy nanocrystals may exhibit greater propensity to adsorb to or react with biological protective barriers and/or background constituents, which passivates their reactivity and reduces their bioavailability and cytotoxicity.