Abstract:Key points A central and unresolved question is how spinal motor neurons are controlled to generate movement; We decoded the spiking activities of dozens of spinal motor neurons innervating six muscles during a multi‐joint task, and we used a purely data‐driven method grounded on graph theory to extract networks of motor neurons based on their correlated activity (considered as common input); The vast majority of the identified motor neurons shared common inputs with other motor neuron(s); Groups of motor neurons were partly decoupled from their innervated muscle, such that motor neurons innervating the same muscle did not necessarily receive common inputs. Conversely, some motor neurons from different muscles ‐ including distant muscles ‐ received common inputs. It supports the theory that movement is produced through the control of groups of motor neurons via common inputs and that there is a partial mismatch between these groups of motor neurons and muscle anatomy. Movements are reportedly controlled through the combination of synergies that generate specific motor outputs by imposing an activation pattern on a group of muscles. To date, the smallest unit of analysis of these synergies has been the muscle through the measurement of its activation. However, the muscle is not the lowest neural level of movement control. In this human study (n = 10), we used a purely data‐driven method grounded on graph theory to extract networks of motor neurons based on their correlated activity during an isometric multi‐joint task. Specifically, high‐density surface electromyography recordings from six lower limb muscles were decomposed into motor neurons spiking activity. We analyzed these activities by identifying their common low‐frequency components, from which networks of correlated activity to the motor neurons were derived and interpreted as networks of common synaptic inputs. The vast majority of the identified motor neurons shared common inputs with other motor neuron(s). In addition, groups of motor neurons were partly decoupled from their innervated muscle, such that motor neurons innervating the same muscle did not necessarily receive common inputs. Conversely, some motor neurons from different muscles – including distant muscles – received common inputs. Our study supports the theory that movements are produced through the control of small numbers of groups of motor neurons via common inputs and that there is a partial mismatch between these groups of motor neurons and muscle anatomy. We provide a new neural framework for a deeper understanding of the structure of common inputs to motor neurons. figure legend Ten participants performed an isometric multi‐joint task, which consisted in producing force on an instrumented pedal. Adhesive grids of 64 electrodes were placed over six lower limb muscles (gastrocnemius medialis [GM] and lateralis [GL], vastus lateralis [VL] and medialis [VM], biceps femoris [BF], semitendinosus [ST]). The high‐density EMG signals were decomposed into motor unit spike trains. For each pair of motor neurons, we assessed the correlation between their smoothed discharge rates to determine whether they shared common input. Then, we used a purely data‐driven method grounded on graph theory to extract networks of common inputs and we applied a clustering procedure to group the motor neurons according to their positions in the graph (i.e., their correlated activity). Results support the theory that movement is produced through the control of small numbers of groups of motor neurons via common inputs and that there is a partial mismatch between these groups of motor neurons and muscle anatomy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Muscle Networks: Connectivity Analysis of EMG Activity During Postural Control

Information decomposition of multichannel EMG to map functional interactions in the distributed motor system

Decoding invariant spatiotemporal synergy patterns on muscle networks of lower-limb movements via surface electromyographic signals

Neuromusculoskeletal models based on the muscle synergy hypothesis for the investigation of adaptive motor control in locomotion via sensory-motor coordination

Muscle Synergies and Muscle Networks in Multiple Frequency Components in Post-Stroke Patients

Spatial and Temporal Muscle Synergies Provide a Dual Characterization of Low-dimensional and Intermittent Control of Upper-limb Movements

Muscle Synergy Analysis of A Set of Lower Extremity Movements in Quiet Standing Scenario: A Preliminary Study

Primitive Muscle Synergies Reflect Different Modes of Coordination in Upper Limb Motions

Correlation networks of spinal motor neurons that innervate lower limb muscles during a multi‐joint isometric task

Muscle synergies for multidirectional isometric force generation during maintenance of upright standing posture

Muscle synergies are associated with intermuscular coherence and cortico-synergy coherence in an isometric upper limb task

Evaluating Muscle Synergies With EMG Data and Physics Simulation in the Neurorobotics Platform

3D muscle networks based on vibrational mechanomyography

Structure, Function, and Control of the Musculoskeletal Network

Coherence Networks of Bilateral Upper Limb Motions in Chronic Stroke Patients

Functional Muscle Network in Post-stroke Patients During Quiet Standing.

Analysis of Multiscale Corticomuscular Coupling Networks Based on Ordinal Patterns

Muscle activation patterns and muscle synergies reflect different modes of coordination during upper extremity movement

Muscle Synergy during Wrist Movements Based on Non-Negative Tucker Decomposition

Corticocortical and Corticomuscular Connectivity Dynamics in Standing Posture: Electroencephalography Study

Modulating Inter-Muscular Coordination Patterns in the Upper Extremity Induces Changes to Inter-Muscular, Cortico-Muscular, and Cortico-Cortical Connectivity