Complex networks embedded in space: Dimension and scaling relations between mass, topological distance and Euclidean distance
Thorsten Emmerich,Armin Bunde,Shlomo Havlin,Li Guanlian,Li Daqing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032802
IF: 2.707
2013-01-01
Physical Review E
Abstract:Many real networks are embedded in space, and often the distribution of the link lengths r follows a power law, p(r) similar to r(-delta). Indications that such systems can be characterized by the concept of dimension were found recently. Here, we present further support for this claim, based on extensive numerical simulations of model networks with a narrow degree distribution, embedded in lattices of dimensions d(e) = 1 and d(e) = 2. For networks with delta < d(e), d is infinity, while for delta > 2d(e), d has the value of the embedding dimension d(e). In the intermediate regime of interest d(e) <= delta < 2d(e), our numerical results suggest that d decreases continuously from d =infinity to de, with d - d(e) proportional to (2 -delta')/[delta'(delta'-1] and delta' = delta/d(e). We also analyze how the mass M and the Euclidean distance r increase with the topological distance l (minimum number of links between two sites in the network). Our results suggest that in the intermediate regime d(e) delta < 2d(e), M(l) and r(l) increase with l as a stretched exponential, M(l) similar to exp[Adl(delta'(2-delta'))] and r(l) similar to exp[Al delta'(2-delta')], such that M(l) similar to r(l)(d). For delta < d(e), M increases exponentially with l (as known for delta = 0), while r is constant and independent of l. For >= 2d(e), we find the expected power-law scaling, M(l) similar to l(dl) and r(l) similar to l(1/dmin), with d(l)d(min) = d. In d(e) = 1, we find the expected result, d(l) = d(min) = 1, while in d(e) = 2 we find surprisingly that although d = 2, d(l) > 2 and d(min) < 1, in contrast to regular lattices. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032802