Abstract:To compare the dynamic effects of straw and corresponding biochar on soil acidity, nutrients, and exchangeable capacity in red soil, a pot experiment was performed. The treatments included control (CK), rice straw (R1B0), rice straw biochar prepared at 350℃ (R1B1) and 550℃ (R1B2), rape stalk (R2B0), and rape stalk biochar prepared at 350℃ (R2B1) and 550℃ (R2B2). Straw at 1% and corresponding biochar were added to a strongly acidic red soil. The rice was planted as the experimental crop. Soils were collected at the seedling, tillering, filling and mature stages of rice growth, respectively. The changes in soil pH, exchangeable acidity, organic matter, nutrients (NH4+-N and NO3--N), and exchangeable cations in soils were measured. The results showed that soil pH, NH4+-N, and NO3--N concentrations decreased with the growth period of rice, while the organic matter content and cation exchange capacity (CEC) increased. Direct returning of straw and biochar could increase soil pH, organic matter content, and exchangeable cations content, and reduce the total amount of exchangeable acids. In the mature stage of rice, rice straw and rape stalk biochar at 350℃ increased the soil pH by 0.29 and 0.42, respectively, compared to the control treatment. Similarly, biochar decreased the exchangeable acidity and exchangeable Al3+ content significantly compared to the direct returning treatments of straw. The exchangeable acidity and exchangeable Al3+ contents of soils in R1B2 and R2B1 treatments decreased by 54.8% and 58.9%, respectively, compared to the control treatment. The soil organic matter (SOM) content and CEC in biochar treatments were significantly higher than those in direct returning treatments of straw. Overall, the effects of rape stalk biochar on soil properties were slightly stronger than those of rice straw. The correlation analysis showed that soil exchangeable acids had a significantly negative correlation with organic matter (R=-0.912, P<0.01), and CEC (R=-0.866, P<0.05). The CEC in soils was positively related to organic matter (R=0.833, P<0.05). Direct returning of straw and biochar applications can effectively improve soil acidity and increase nutrient contents. The effects of straw biochar on soils were stronger than the direct returning of straw in decreasing soil acidity, and increasing soil organic matter content and exchangeable capacity in acidic soils.

[Response of Straw and Straw Biochar Returning to Soil Carbon Budget and Its Mechanism].

Response of soil respiration to straw and straw biochar returning and its microbial mechanism

[Response of Soil Respiration and Organic Carbon to Returning of Different Agricultural Straws and Its Mechanism].

Straw and straw biochar differently affect phosphorus availability, enzyme activity and microbial functional genes in an Ultisol

Responses of Soil Microbial Community Structure and Activity to Incorporation of Straws and Straw Biochars and Their Effects on Soil Respiration and Soil Organic Carbon Turnover

[Dynamic Effects of Direct Returning of Straw and Corresponding Biochar on Acidity, Nutrients, and Exchangeable Properties of Red Soil].

Variability of Soil Carbon Budget of the Reclaimed Lands with Different Straw Returning Modes and Its Microbial Mechanism

Effects of Straw Carbon Input on Carbon Dynamics in Agricultural Soils: A Meta-Analysis

Response of soil organic carbon to straw return in farmland soil in China: A meta-analysis

[Impacts of Biochar and Straw Application on Soil Organic Carbon Transformation].

Effects of Straw Returning Combine with Biochar on Water Quality under Flooded Condition

The Effects of Straw Return on Soil Bacterial Diversity and Functional Profiles: A Meta-Analysis

Biochar and Straw Amendments over a Decade Divergently Alter Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation Pathways

Effects of straw and its derived biochar on soil microbial community structure in soil

Straw Returning Methods Affects Macro-Aggregate Content and Organic Matter Content in Black Soils: Meta-Analysis and Comprehensive Validation

The variability and causes of organic carbon retention ability of different agricultural straw types returned to soil.

Maize Straw Returning Approaches Affected Straw Decomposition and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Storage in Northeast China

Straw and Biochar Amendments Over a Decade Differently Modulates Denitrification Gas Products

Contrasting Effects of Different Straw Return Modes on Net Ecosystem Carbon Budget and Carbon Footprint in Saline-Alkali Arid Farmland

Soil Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen, Available Nutrients, and Yield under Different Straw Returning Methods

Effects of Continuous Straw Returning on Soil Functional Microorganisms and Microbial Communities