Critical waves and the length problem of biology

Robert B. Laughlin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422855112
IF: 11.1
2015-08-03
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance This paper invokes physical principles to answer the question of why pure reaction–diffusion ideas do not produce a satisfactory explanation of biological growth and form. Two ideas have been missing. One is that oscillation is necessary to achieve the necessary design stability and plasticity. The other is that the system must be tuned to criticality to stabilize the propagation velocity, thus enabling clocks to function as meter sticks. The larger significance is twofold: First, a fundamental piece of the machinery of life is probably invisible to present-day biochemical methods because they are too slow. Second, the simplicity of growth and form identified a century ago by D'Arcy Thompson is probably a symptom of biological engineering strategies, not primitive law.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?