Abstract:Basic psychological research on couples and families can be valuable in informing social policies and interventions. This article provides an overview of recent research addressing factors that contribute to satisfying and enduring adult partnerships. Surprisingly, evidence linking communication between intimate partners to the outcome of their relationships has been weak and counterintuitive. This has prompted several new lines of research on how intimate relationships change. Recent findings reviewed here highlight the value of (a) expanding conceptions of intimate communication by considering how social support and positive emotional expressions moderate the effects of problem-solving skills on changes in relationship quality, (b) examining partners’ personal strengths and vulnerabilities as antecedents of aggression and hostile interaction, and (c) recognising the central role of chronic circumstances and acute stress in governing fluctuations in partners’ judgements of relationship quality. The implications of these findings for strengthening intimate partnerships are outlined. 1 Acknowledgments The text of this article is based on a keynote address given by the first author at the “Strengthening Family Relationships” conference, December 2003, in Wellington, New Zealand, organised by Jan Pryor and Allen Gomes, and sponsored by the Centre for Social Research and Evaluation in the New Zealand Ministry of Social Development, the New Zealand Social Policy Evaluation and Research Committee (SPEaR), and the Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families, School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington. A previous version of this talk was given by the first author in November 2003 at the annual meeting of the National Conference on Family Relations (see Bradbury and Karney 2004). Preparation of this article was supported by NIH grants R01 MH048764 (Bradbury) and R01 MH59712 (Karney). We thank Lexi Rothman, Lisa Story, Natasha Emmerson, Athena Yoneda, Matthew Johnson and Rebecca Cobb for their valuable contributions to this article. The couples presented in this article have given us permission to use their data for this purpose; nevertheless, identifying information has been modified to protect their identity. Correspondence Thomas Bradbury, UCLA Department of Psychology, Box 951563, Los Angeles CA 90095-1563. Email: Bradbury@psych.ucla.edu. Additional information about the research presented here can be found at www.uclamarriagelab.com ƒMSD11487_SP Journal_Nov04_v6 22/12/04 11:37 AM Page 1

THE CONTRIBUTION OF PARTNER INVESTMENTS TO ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP COMMITMENT

Relationship commitment regulation: Influencing a partner's commitment to achieve one's commitment goals

Investments in Marriage and Cohabitation: The Role of Legal and Interpersonal Commitment

Interested and Instrumental: An Examination of Instrumentality Regulation With Potential Romantic Partners

How Do Invested Partners Become Invested? A Prospective Investigation of Fledgling Relationship Development

Marital Commitment, Communication and Marital Satisfaction: an Analysis Based on Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.

Ready for the next step: Novel commitment amplification in romantic relationships

Predicting commitment in young adults' physically aggressive and sexually coercive dating relationships

How Are Provided and Received Social Support Related to Relationship Satisfaction and Self-Esteem? A Comprehensive Test of Competing Hypotheses

The roles of parental and partner attachment working models in romantic relationships

Maximizing Tendencies in Marriage: Accentuating the Implications of Readily Observable Partner Characteristics for Intimates' Satisfaction

Why Do(n’t) Your Partner’s Efforts at Self-Improvement Make You Happy? An Implicit Theories Perspective

Saving Graces: Impact Of Partner Support And Maternal Attachment On Partner Attachments In An Individualistic And A Collectivist Context

Understanding and Altering the Longitudinal Course of Intimate Partnerships

Romantic Relationships as a Source of Significance

Happy couples "see" helpful partners: Relationship quality predicts biased perceptions of partner instrumentality to one's goals

Relationships with intimate partner, best friend, and parents in adolescence and early adulthood: A study of the saliency of the intimate partnership

Maintaining Relationships: The Role of Implicit Relationship Theories and Partner Fit

An Assessment of Meyer and Allen's (1991) Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intentions

Implicit Theories of Relationships: Who Cares if Romantic Partners Are Less than Ideal?

Hopeful Woman, Happy Couple: A Dyadic Model of Hope, Partner Support, and Relationship Satisfaction