Abstract:In order to interact seamlessly with robots, users must infer the causes of a robot’s behavior–and be confident about that inference (and its predictions). Hence, trust is a necessary condition for human-robot collaboration (HRC). However, and despite its crucial role, it is still largely unknown how trust emerges, develops, and supports human relationship to technological systems. In the following paper we review the literature on trust, human-robot interaction, HRC, and human interaction at large. Early models of trust suggest that it is a trade-off between benevolence and competence; while studies of human to human interaction emphasize the role of shared behavior and mutual knowledge in the gradual building of trust. We go on to introduce a model of trust as an agent’ best explanation for reliable sensory exchange with an extended motor plant or partner. This model is based on the cognitive neuroscience of active inference and suggests that, in the context of HRC, trust can be casted in terms of virtual control over an artificial agent. Interactive feedback is a necessary condition to the extension of the trustor’s perception-action cycle. This model has important implications for understanding human-robot interaction and collaboration–as it allows the traditional determinants of human trust, such as the benevolence and competence attributed to the trustee, to be defined in terms of hierarchical active inference, while vulnerability can be described in terms of information exchange and empowerment. Furthermore, this model emphasizes the role of user feedback during HRC and suggests that boredom and surprise may be used in personalized interactions as markers for under and over-reliance on the system. The description of trust as a sense of virtual control offers a crucial step toward grounding human factors in cognitive neuroscience and improving the design of human-centered technology. Furthermore, we examine the role of shared behavior in the genesis of trust, especially in the context of dyadic collaboration, suggesting important consequences for the acceptability and design of human-robot collaborative systems.

Trust-based variable impedance control of human–robot cooperative manipulation

Adaptive-Constrained Impedance Control for Human–Robot Co-Transportation

Unified Motion/Force/Impedance Control for Manipulators in Unknown Contact Environments Based on Robust Model-Reaching Approach

Human–Robot Shared Control Based on Locally Weighted Intent Prediction for a Teleoperated Hydraulic Manipulator System

Unified Contact Model and Hybrid Motion/force Control for Teleoperated Manipulation in Unknown Environments

Human–Robot Collaboration Framework Based on Impedance Control in Robotic Assembly

Proactive Robot Control for Collaborative Manipulation Using Human Intent

Multi-Task Trust Transfer for Human-Robot Interaction

A Learning Based Hierarchical Control Framework for Human-Robot Collaboration

Intention-Driven Variable Impedance Control for Physical Human-Robot Interaction

A Human-Robot Co-Manipulation Approach Based on Human Sensorimotor Information

Human Multi-robot Cooperative Manipulation Based on Distributed Control

Trust as Extended Control: Human-Machine Interactions as Active Inference

Constraint-Aware Intent Estimation for Dynamic Human-Robot Object Co-Manipulation

Reverse Psychology in Trust-Aware Human-Robot Interaction

Trust as Extended Control: Active Inference and User Feedback During Human-Robot Collaboration

Trust-Preserved Human-Robot Shared Autonomy enabled by Bayesian Relational Event Modeling

An Augmented Discrete-Time Approach for Human-Robot Collaboration

Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Variable Impedance Control for Human-Robot Collaboration

Learning Variable Admittance Control for Human-Robot Collaborative Manipulation

Neural Learning Enhanced Variable Admittance Control for Human–Robot Collaboration