Abstract:Dementia is a worldwide concern. Its global prevalence is increasing. At present, there is no medication licensed to prevent or delay the onset of dementia. Inflammation has been suggested as a key factor in dementia pathogenesis. Therefore, medications with anti‐inflammatory properties could be beneficial for dementia prevention. To evaluate the effectiveness and adverse effects of aspirin and other non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the primary or secondary prevention of dementia. We searched ALOIS, the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group up to 9 January 2020. ALOIS contains records of clinical trials identified from monthly searches of several major healthcare databases, trial registries and grey literature sources. We ran additional searches across MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP) and six other databases to ensure that the searches were as comprehensive and up‐to‐date as possible. We also reviewed citations of reference lists of included studies. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing aspirin or other NSAIDs with placebo for the primary or secondary prevention of dementia. We included trials with cognitively healthy participants (primary prevention) or participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or cognitive complaints (secondary prevention). We used standard methodological procedures according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions . We rated the strength of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. We included four RCTs with 23,187 participants. Because of the diversity of these trials, we did not combine data to give summary estimates, but presented a narrative description of the evidence. We identified one trial (19,114 participants) comparing low‐dose aspirin (100 mg once daily) to placebo. Participants were aged 70 years or older with no history of dementia, cardiovascular disease or physical disability. Interim analysis indicated no significant treatment effect and the trial was terminated slightly early after a median of 4.7 years' follow‐up. There was no evidence of a difference in incidence of dementia between aspirin and placebo groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15; high‐certainty evidence). Participants allocated aspirin had higher rates of major bleeding (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.60, high‐certainty evidence) and slightly higher mortality (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.28; high‐certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in activities of daily living between groups (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; high‐certainty evidence). We identified three trials comparing non‐aspirin NSAIDs to placebo. All three trials were terminated early due to adverse events associated with NSAIDs reported in other trials. One trial (2528 participants) investigated the cyclo‐oxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitor celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) and the non‐selective NSAID naproxen (220 mg twice daily) for preventing dementia in cognitively healthy older adults with a family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Median follow‐up was 734 days. Combining both NSAID treatment arms, there was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of AD between participants allocated NSAIDs and those allocated placebo (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.89 to 4.10; moderate‐certainty evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference in rates of myocardial infarction (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.40), stroke (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.37) or mortality (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.43) between treatment groups (all moderate‐certainty evidence). One trial (88 participants) assessed the effectiveness of celecoxib (200 mg or 400 mg daily) in delaying cognitive decline in participants aged 40 to 81 years with mild age‐related memory loss but normal memory performance scores. Mean duration of follow‐up was 17.6 months in the celecoxib group and 18.1 months in the placebo group. There was no evidence of a difference between groups in test scores in any of six cognitive domains. Participants allocated celecoxib experienced more gastrointestinal adverse events than those allocated placebo (RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.05 to 6.75; low‐certainty evidence). One trial (1457 participants) assessed the effectiveness of the COX‐2 inhibitor rofecoxib (25 mg once daily) in delaying or preventing a diagnosis of AD in participants with MCI. Median duration of study participation was 115 weeks in the rofecoxib group and 130 weeks in the placebo group. There was a higher incidence of AD in the rofecoxib than the placebo group (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.72; moderate‐certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between groups in cardiovascular adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.66; moderate‐certainty evidence) or mortality (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.05; moderate‐certainty evidence). Participants allocated rofecoxib had more upper -Abstract Truncated-

Aspirin Use on Incident Dementia and Mild Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Association of aspirin with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Association Between Aspirin Use and Age-Related Macular Degeneration: a Meta-Analysis.

Dose-Dependent Effect of Aspirin Use in Reducing Diabetes-Associated Dementia Risk Among Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Is aspirin use associated with age-related macular degeneration? A meta-analysis.

Primary prevention of myocardial infarction: aspirin is not as useful as it seems

Aspirin Use and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis

Aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of dementia.

Aspirin and Risk of Dementia in Patients with Late-Onset Depression: A Population-Based Cohort Study

The Benefit and Safety of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Association of aspirin use with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients without history of stroke or transient ischemic attack in the UK Biobank

Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aspirin Use and Common Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

Effect and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases:a systematic review and meta analysis

Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Subgroup Analysis by Sex and Diabetes Status.

Association of Aspirin Therapy with Prognosis in Patients with Non Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Low-Dose Aspirin and the Risk of Stroke and Intracerebral Bleeding in Healthy Older People: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Outcomes Associated with 50 Mg/d and 100 Mg/d Aspirin for the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Chinese Elderly: Single-Center Interim Analysis of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study

Pros and Cons of Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Secondary Study of Trial Sequential Analysis

Targeting memory loss with aspirin, a molecular mechanism perspective for future therapeutic approaches

Subgroup analysis of the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly randomized clinical trial suggests aspirin did not improve outcomes in older adults with chronic kidney disease