Abstract:Research involving human participants requires their consent, and it is common practice to capture consent information on paper and store those hard copies, presenting issues such as long-term storage requirements, inefficient retrieval of consent forms for reference or future use, and the potential for transcription errors when transcribing captured informed consent. There have been calls to move to electronic capture of the consent provided by research participants (e-consent) as a way of addressing these issues. A tiered framework for e-consent was designed using the freely available features in the inbuilt REDCap e-consent module. We implemented 'branching logic', 'wet signature' and 'auto-archiver' features to the main informed consent and withdrawal of consent documents. The branching logic feature streamlines the consent process by making follow-up information available depending on participant response, the 'wet signature' feature enables a timestamped electronic signature to be appended to the e-consent documents and the 'auto-archiver' allows for PDF copies of the e-consent documents to be stored in the database. When designing the content layout, we provided example participant information text which can be modified as required. Emphasis was placed on the flow of information to optimise participant understanding and this was achieved by merging the consent and participant information into one document where the consent questions were asked immediately after the corresponding participant information. In addition, we have provided example text for a generic human genomic research study, which can be easily edited and modified according to specific requirements. Building informed consent protocols and forms without prior experience can be daunting, so we have provided researchers with a REDCap template that can be directly incorporated into REDCap databases. It prompts researchers about the types of consent they can request for genomics studies and assists them with suggestions for the language they might use for participant information and consent questions. The use of this tiered e-consent module can ensure the accurate and efficient electronic capture and storage of the consents given by participants in a format that can be easily queried and can thus facilitate ethical and effective onward sharing of data and samples whilst upholding individual participant preferences.

Consent as a compositional act – a framework that provides clarity for the retention and use of data

Consent: A Research and Design Lens for Human-Computer Interaction

Thinking about the idea of consent in data science genomics: How 'informed' is it?

#consented - A semantic consent code to facilitate consistent documentation and implementation of consent in collaborative medical research

An Online Consent Maturity Model: Moving from Acceptable Use towards Ethical Practice

Facing new challenges to informed consent processes in the context of translational research: the case in CARPEM consortium

Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study

The Open Brain Consent: Informing research participants and obtaining consent to share brain imaging data

Reshaping informed consent in the biobanking context

An e-consent framework for tiered informed consent for human genomic research in the global south, implemented as a REDCap template

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks

Student Consent in Learning Analytics

The conceptualisation of a Configurable Consent Architecture for Personal Data Release

Recovering the History of Informed Consent for Data Science and Internet Industry Research Ethics

Consent for data processing under the General Data Protection Regulation: Could ‘dynamic consent’ be a useful tool for researchers?

When Exceptions are the Norm: Exploring the Role of Consent in HRI

Designing Intelligent Agents in Normative Systems Toward Data Regulation Representation

OConsent -- Open Consent Protocol for Privacy and Consent Management with Blockchain

Beyond the EULA: Improving consent for data mining

Consent Management Platforms under the GDPR: processors and/or controllers?

[Key considerations in the process of assent in children and adolescents: an integrative review]