The New Swedish pension System

E. Palmer
2001-09-01
Abstract:In a series of steps in the 1990s, Sweden converted a two-tier defined benefit scheme from 1960 into a combination of notional defined contribution (NDC) pay-as-you-go and financial defined contribution (FDC) schemes. The reform was driven by the threat of future large contribution rate increases, redistributional unfairness in the design of the old system and a goal of providing a framework that would promote mandatory saving through the pension system – but with privately managed assets. The overall contribution rate for the two schemes together is 18.5 % of earnings, with a split of 16/2.5 between the notional and financial account schemes. The annuity in both schemes is based on lifetime account values and life expectancy at retirement. Accounts in the NDC system earn an economic rate of return, whereas accounts in the FDC scheme earn a financial rate. The reform creates mandatory insurance without redistribution – other than over the individual’s own lifetime, and the redistribution from men to women embodied in the unisexual life expectancy factor used to compute annuities, both in the NDC and FDC schemes. Redistribution is financed through general revenues, instead of through the insurance system, with the most important example being a new guarantee benefit for low-income pensioners. Also, all non-contributory credits are financed with general revenues, and money is transferred to the NDC and FDC schemes to support these credits. As a part of the reform, a separate deduction for pensioners was abolished putting all forms of pension income and earnings on the same tax status. The remainder of this paper focuses on why the reform was undertaken and how the new system is designed.
Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?