Abstract:In oceanic and atmospheric models, thermodynamic functions and conservative variables introduce arbitrariness. However, observable predictions by the Navier–Stokes–Fourier model are insensitive to changes in reference enthalpies and entropies. This invariance should extend to derived coarse‐grain models. Examining conservative variables' dependence on a reference pressure reveals its impact on fluxes, gradients, and closures. Closure relationships between proposed "reduced" gradients and fluxes of enthalpy and entropy ensure model invariance, even with multiple turbulent diffusivities. Further research is needed for convective closures. Thermodynamics is an essential ingredient of fine‐grain and coarse‐grain models of oceanic and atmospheric flows. Thermodynamic functions and conservative variables, for a given set of observable quantities such as pressure, temperature, and composition, may be defined up to a certain degree of arbitrariness, in the sense that the predictions of the fine‐grain model are insensitive to, for example, some reference enthalpies, entropies, or pressures. Since the compressible Navier–Stokes model, regarded as a "mother" fine‐grain model, is invariant with respect to arbitrary changes in reference enthalpies and entropies, restricted only by phase change, any coarse‐grain model obtained from it, even conceptually, must be invariant at least to the same extent. A framework is devised that enables the systematic examination of this invariance. It is found that the dependence of usual conservative variables on a reference pressure propagates to their fluxes and gradients, and to downgradient closures based on them. To resolve this issue, it is shown how to construct invariant "reduced" gradients and fluxes of enthalpy and entropy. Closure relationships between such "reduced" fluxes and gradients are then guaranteed to be invariant. More work is required to address the invariance of more sophisticated closures, especially shallow and deep convective closures.

Comparison of methodologies for the application of the Onsager variational principle

Variational approach for the flow of Ree-Eyring and Casson fluids in pipes

A variational discretization method for mean curvature flows by the Onsager principle

Influence of thermophoretic deposition and viscous dissipation on magnetohydrodynamic flow with variable viscosity and thermal conductivity

Variational approach for resolving the flow of generalized Newtonian fluids in circular pipes and plane slits

A Unified Treatment of General Fluid Thermodynamics and Its Application to a Preconditioning Scheme

Further validation to the variational method to obtain flow relations for generalized Newtonian fluids

On the thermodynamic invariance of fine-grain and coarse-grain fluid models

A Short Remark on Chien’s Variational Principle of Maximum Power Losses for Viscous Fluids

Variational principle for the Navier-Stokes equations

Onsager Theory of Turbulence, the Josephson–Anderson Relation, and the D'Alembert Paradox

Variational and thermodynamically consistent finite element discretization for heat conducting viscous fluids

Using Euler-Lagrange Variational Principle to Obtain Flow Relations for Generalized Newtonian Fluids

On the thermodynamic invariance of fine‐grain and coarse‐grain fluid models

Dynamic Vorticity Condition - Theoretical-Analysis And Numerical Implementation

Fluid dynamics described from new dynamic hypothesis

A scalable variational inequality approach for flow through porous media models with pressure-dependent viscosity

Applications of Group Analysis to the Three-Dimensional Equations of Fluids with Internal Inertia

On a Family of Unsplit Advection Algorithms for Volume-of-Fluid Methods.

On a thermodynamically consistent model for magnetoviscoelastic fluids in 3D

Statistical formulation of Onsager-Machlup variational principle