Rapid eye movement dependency is associated with increased inflammatory activity in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Asli Akyol Gurses,Utku Ogan Akyildiz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3546

IF: 3.1

2024-06-08

Brain and Behavior

Abstract:REM‐dependent OSAS has some typical characteristics that distinguish it from stage‐independent OSAS. These include a preference for younger age, female gender, and milder disease severity. Although these features suggest a benign course for this phenotype, recent literature shows that it is also associated with various cardiometabolic consequences. In our retrospective study, we found that PDW and SII, two accessible blood parameters, indicate an increased inflammatory status in this subtype. Our results highlight the need for close follow‐up in patients with REM‐dependent OSAS, as increased systemic inflammation can have negative consequences. Objective Rapid eye movement (REM)‐dependent obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a specific subtype of OSAS having some phenotypic characteristics like a preference for a younger age, female gender, and milder severity. Such favorable features could make it possible to consider an overall benign course for this phenotype. However, accumulating data introduced its association with several cardiometabolic and vascular disorders recently. The primary objective of this study was to address the disease from the inflammation perspective and evaluate the potential inflammatory status in this variant via two accessible blood parameters: platelet distribution width (PDW) and systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII). The secondary aim was to investigate whether this status, together with other disease characteristics, demonstrates consistency under different definitions of REM‐dependent OSAS published previously. Patients and methods The medical records of 35 patients with mild‐to‐moderate REM‐dependent OSAS, 35 age‐ and sex‐matched patients with REM‐independent OSAS, and 25 non‐OSA controls were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline features, polysomnographic characteristics, PDW, and SII were compared between the groups. Secondly, the analyses were repeated using different definitions of REM‐dependent OSAS. Bivariate analyses were performed, and a multiple stepwise regression model was applied to adjust for body mass index (BMI) and cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors. Results Mean PDW and SII were increased in patients with REM‐dependent OSAS as compared to non‐OSA controls (p = .022 and .029). The significance remained stable after adjustment for BMI and CVRs and was consistent according to different definitions. The Comparison of patients with REM‐independent OSAS and non‐OSA controls, as well as the two different subtypes of OSAS, did not yield significance. Conclusion Based on the current findings, patients with REM‐dependent OSAS appear to be susceptible to inflammation and should be carefully monitored for the negative consequences of that issue. To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate SII and PDW in REM‐dependent OSAS.

behavioral sciences,neurosciences