Abstract:Background Previous studies have revealed that there is significant geographical variation in place of death in (PoD) England, with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics explaining ≤ 25% of this variation. Service factors, mostly modifiable, may account for some of the unexplained variation, but their role had never been evaluated systematically. Methods A national population-based observational study in England, using National Death Registration Database (2014) linked to area-level service data from public domains, categorised by commissioning, type and capacity, location and workforce of the services, and the service use. The relationship between the service variables and PoD was evaluated using beta regression at the area level and using generalised linear mixed models at the patient level. The relative contribution of service factors at the area level was assessed using the per cent of variance explained, measured by R2. The total impact of service factors was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The independent effect of service variables was measured at the individual level by odds ratios (ORs). Results Among the 431,735 adult deaths, hospitals were the most common PoD (47.3%), followed by care homes (23.1%), homes (22.5%) and hospices (6.1%). One-third (30.3%) of the deaths were due to cancer and two-thirds (69.7%) were due to non-cancer causes. Almost all service categories studied were associated with some of the area-level variation in PoD. Service type and capacity had the strongest link among all service categories, explaining 14.2–73.8% of the variation; service location explained 10.8–34.1% of the variation. The contribution of other service categories to PoD was inconsistent. At the individual level, service variables appeared to be more useful in predicting death in hospice than in hospital or care home, with most AUCs in the fair performance range (0.603–0.691). The independent effect of service variables on PoD was small overall, but consistent. Distance to the nearest care facility was negatively associated with death in that facility. At the Clinical Commissioning Group level, the number of hospices per 10,000 adults was associated with a higher chance of hospice death in non-cancer causes (OR 30.88, 99% confidence interval 3.46 to 275.44), but a lower chance of hospice death in cancer causes. There was evidence for an interaction effect between the service variables and sociodemographic variables on PoD. Limitations This study was limited by data availability, particularly those specific to palliative and end-of-life care; therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Data limitations were partly due to the lack of attention and investment in this area. Conclusion A link was found between service factors and PoD. Hospice capacity was associated with hospice death in non-cancer cases. Distance to the nearest care facility was negatively correlated with the probability of a patient dying there. Effect size of the service factors was overall small, but the interactive effect between service factors and sociodemographic variables suggests that high-quality end-of-life care needs to be built on service-level configuration tailored to individuals’ circumstances. Future work A large data gap was identified and data collection is required nationally on services relevant to palliative and end-of-life care. Future research is needed to verify the identified links between service factors and PoD. Funding The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

The Changing Demographics of Inpatient Hospice Death: Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Study in England, 1993–2012

Changing patterns in place of cancer death in England: a population-based study.

Regional Variations in Geographic Access to Inpatient Hospices and Place of Death: A Population-based Study in England, UK.

Geographical and Temporal Understanding in Place of Death in England (1984–2010): Analysis of Trends and Associated Factors to Improve End-of-life Care (guide_care) – Primary Research

Sociodemographic Determinants of Place of Death in Dementia: Whole Population Cross-Sectional Analysis in England, 2001–10

Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Factors Associated With The Provision Of Inpatient Care In Hospices

Reversal of the British trends in place of death: time series analysis 2004-2010

OP70 Place of Cancer Deaths in England, 2001-2010: Time Trends and Determinants

Does Ethnicity Affect Where People with Cancer Die? A Population-Based 10 Year Study

INCREASING COMPLEXITY AT THE END OF LIFE IN PEOPLE WHO DIED FROM CANCER AGED 85 YEARS OR OLDER, ENGLAND 2001–2012

Effect Of National Policy Changes On Hospice Utilization And The Invasiveness Of End-Of-Life Care In Cancer Patients.

The role of service factors on variations in place of death: an observational study

Clinician Perception of Likelihood of Death in the Next Year Is Associated With 1-Year Mortality and Hospice Use Among Older Adults Receiving Home Health Care

Risk factors for hospital death in conditions needing palliative care: Nationwide population-based death certificate study

Place and Cause of Death in Centenarians: a Population-Based Observational Study in England, 2001 to 2010.

Factors Associated with Transition from Community Settings to Hospital as Place of Death for Adults Aged 75 and Older: A Population-Based Mortality Follow-Back Survey.

Characteristics and Mortality Rates among Patients Requiring Intermediate Care: a National Cohort Study Using Linked Databases

Reversal of English Trend Towards Hospital Death in Dementia: a Population-Based Study of Place of Death and Associated Individual and Regional Factors, 2001–2010

Primary Care Contacts, Continuity, Identification of Palliative Care Needs, and Hospital Use: a Population-Based Cohort Study in People Dying with Dementia

Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009