Abstract:The Zero-P spacer was primarily developed aiming to reduce the morbidity associated with the traditional anterior cervical plate. During the past decade, many authors have reported the use of Zero-P spacers for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) of one or two segments. Nevertheless, there is still a paucity of knowledge on the safety and feasibility of using Zero-P spacers for 3-level fixation. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes, with a focus on the sagittal alignment reconstruction of 3-level ACDF surgery using Zero-P spacers versus those using a traditional plate and cage system. From Sep 2013 to Aug 2016, a total of 44 patients who received 3-level ACDF surgery due to cervical spondylotic myelopathy were recruited. The Zero-P spacer was used in 23 patients (group ZP) and the traditional plate and cage system in 21 (group PC). Clinical outcomes were analyzed by Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and dysphagia was evaluated using the Bazaz score. Radiological outcomes, including fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and especially changes in cervical sagittal alignment, were analyzed. The NDI and JOA scores did not differ significantly between the two groups postoperatively (p > 0.05); however, there was significantly less dysphagia in patients using Zero-P spacers at the 3- and 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, the fusion rate and ASD were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Interestingly, patients using Zero-P spacers had a significantly lower postoperative C2-7 Cobb angle and fused segment Cobb angle, compared to those using a traditional plate and cage system (p < 0.05); meanwhile, the fused segment disc wedge was also found to be significantly smaller in patients using Zero-P spacers after surgery (p < 0.05). Moreover, we further divided patients into subgroups according to their cervical lordosis. In patients with a preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle ≤ 10°, significantly less cervical and local lordosis, as well as disc wedge, were seen in group ZP after surgery (p < 0.05), while in others with a preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle > 10°, no significant difference in postoperative changes of the cervical sagittal alignment was seen between group ZP and group PC (p > 0.05). Zero-P spacers used in 3-level ACDF surgery could provide equivalent clinical outcomes and a lower rate of postoperative dysphagia, compared to the traditional plate and cage system. However, our results showed that it was inferior to the cervical plate in terms of sagittal alignment reconstruction for 3-level fixation. We recommend applying Zero-P spacers for 3-level ACDF in patients with good preoperative cervical lordosis (C2-7 Cobb angle > 10°), in order to restore and maintain physiological curvature of the cervical spine postoperatively.

Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study.

Comparison of a Stand-Alone Anchored Spacer Versus Plate-Cage Construct in the Treatment of Two Noncontiguous Levels of Cervical Spondylosis: A Preliminary Investigation.

Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between the Self-locking Stand-alone Cage and Conventional Cage-plate Construct: A Five-year Retrospective Cohort Study

Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up

Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques in the surgical management of patients with 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Cervical Spine Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Multilevel Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with or Without Plate A Minimal 5-Year Follow-Up of a CONSORT-compliant Article

Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion.

Anterior Decompression and Hybrid Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cage Plus Plate and Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage for the Treatment of Three-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Assessing surgical outcomes for cage plate system versus stand-alone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Three-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Self-Locking Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cages.

Clinical and Radiological Comparison of the Zero-Profile Anchored Cage and Traditional Cage-Plate Fixation in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Is the Zero-P Spacer Suitable for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Terms of Sagittal Alignment Reconstruction: A Comparison Study with Traditional Plate and Cage System

Exploration on Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: a Minimum of a 5-Year Follow-Up.

Comparison of Two Reconstructive Techniques in the Surgical Management of Four-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Comparative Study Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with ROI-C Cage and Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Without Spinal Stenosis

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile versus stand-alone cages for two-level cervical spondylosis: A retrospective cohort study

A comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: Minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Comparative Analysis of Cage Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Zero Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) Vs. Conventional Cage and Plate Construct

Stand-Alone Anchored Spacer vs Anterior Plate Construct in the Management of Adjacent Segment Disease after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Application of a Stand-Alone Anchored Spacer in Noncontiguous Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis with Radiologic Analysis of the Intermediate Segment