Abstract:Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the Zn finger protein CTCF in the establishment of genetic borders and in controlling spatially-restricted activity of a mammary-specific super-enhancer (SE) known to selectively activate gene expression during pregnancy. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was used to generate mice with deletions in CTCF binding sites (CBSs) separating the Wap SE from the Ramp3 gene. ChIP-seq and qRT-PCR were used to investigate protein-DNA interactions and changes in gene expression, respectively. RNA-seq data demonstrated that expression of the mammary-specific Wap and widely-expressed Ramp3 gene was activated in mammary tissue at the onset of lactation. To investigate the possibility that the Wap SE can regulate both genes, mice carrying deletions in the SE were established. In these mice, both Wap and downstream Ramp3 were downregulated to the same extent, supporting the notion that the SE regulates both genes. Given these results, we investigated the contributions of several intervening CBSs in dampening SE activity on Ramp3. Mice harboring individual and combinatorial deletions of three CBSs (A, B and C) between the Wap SE and Ramp3 were generated. While loss of CTCF at site B (ΔB) had no apparent effect, loss of site A (ΔA) led to an expansion of H3K27ac from the adjacent SE in mammary tissue. The site C mutation (ΔC) resulted in a two-fold induction of Ramp3 in mammary tissue. Mice lacking all three binding sites demonstrated a marked increase in Ramp3 expression, which indicates that the CBSs block expression in an additive manner. To test the possible insulator function of these in a tissue with opposing gene expression, cerebellum was chosen as Ramp3 is actively transcribed while Wap is silent. The ΔA and ΔB mice showed no phenotype, but surprisingly ΔC mice demonstrated an 80% reduction in Ramp3 expression. Analysis of ChIP-seq and DNAse-seq demonstrated that site C coincides with a cerebellum-specific enhancer, which appears to regulate Ramp3 expression. These data demonstrate that a SE can activate two genes, albeit to different degrees. Furthermore, we demonstrate that CBSs do not serve as tight genetic boundaries encapsulating transcriptional enhancers and their associated genes, but are porous borders that allow for fine tuning of transcriptional activity. Individual CBSs have a modest ability to insulate genes, but a cluster of CTCF proteins is required to adjust the enhancer activity on genes and prevent deregulation. In addition, we show that CBSs are not restricted to a unique function and can act in a tissue-specific manner to contribute to gene regulation. These data help us to develop a more nuanced understanding of SE function as well as the roles of CTCF in regulating gene expression. Previous studies have shown that SEs and CBSs are mutational hotspots in cancer, implicating them in tumorigenesis. A more complete understanding of their biology will allow a better understanding of their role in cancer. Citation Format: Michaela Willi, Tyler M. Kuhns, Kyung Hyun Yoo, Fabian Reinisch, Christian Reinbold, Teresa Mohr, Chaochen Wang, Lothar Hennighausen. The role of super-enhancers and genetic boundaries in gene regulation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4993. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4993

Deciphering the regulatory logic of an ancient, ultraconserved nuclear receptor enhancer module.

The Role Of Super-Enhancers And Genetic Boundaries In Gene Regulation

Abstract 4993: the Role of Super-Enhancers and Genetic Boundaries in Gene Regulation

Genomic Structure and Analysis of Transcriptional Regulation of the Mouse Zinc-Fingers and Homeoboxes 1 (ZHX1) Gene

An Autoregulatory Enhancer Controls Mammary-Specific Stat5 Functions

Role of Nuclear Receptor Condensates in Ligand Induced Co‐operative Gene Regulation

A phylogenetically conserved cis-regulatory module in the Msx2 promoter is sufficient for BMP-dependent transcription in murine and Drosophila embryos

Molecular Mechanism for the Potentiation of the Transcriptional Activity of Human Liver Receptor Homolog 1 by Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1

A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors

Transcriptional Activation by Thyroid Hormone Receptor-β Involves Chromatin Remodeling, Histone Acetylation, and Synergistic Stimulation by P300 and Steroid Receptor Coactivators

The Role of KRAB-ZFPs in Transposable Element Repression and Mammalian Evolution

Transposable Elements and Their KRAB-ZFP Controllers Regulate Gene Expression in Adult Tissues

Synergistic DNA and RNA binding of the Hox transcription factor Ultrabithorax coordinates splicing and shapes in vivo homeotic functions

Krüppel-like factors: three fingers in control

Interactome Maps of Mouse Gene Regulatory Domains Reveal Basic Principles of Transcriptional Regulation.

KRAB–Zinc Finger Proteins and KAP1 Can Mediate Long-Range Transcriptional Repression through Heterochromatin Spreading

Tbl1 and Tblr1 Phosphorylation on Regulated Gene Promoters Overcomes Dual Ctbp and Ncor/Smrt Transcriptional Repression Checkpoints

Nested epistasis enhancer networks for robust genome regulation

A Poised Chromatin Platform for TGF-β Access to Master Regulators.

High-throughput functional characterization of combinations of transcriptional activators and repressors

Genomic context sensitizes regulatory elements to genetic disruption