Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Many different correction methods have been reported to treat severe and rigid scoliosis. In the past, anterior and posterior spinal fusion (APSF), which included an anterior release followed by posterior instrumented fusion, was widely applied. In recent years, anterior/ posterior vertebral column resection (APVCR) is used to treat severe and rigid scoliosis. PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the clinical results of APSF and APVCR for severe and rigid scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, one-center, institutional review board-approved study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 48 patients with severe and rigid scoliosis treated by APSF or APVCR were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons between groups were made regarding the following variables: age at surgery, gender, etiology, flexibility of main curve. anterior release length, posterior fusion length, screw number, operation time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization time, follow-up duration, different radiological parameters. complication rate, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores. METHODS: According to the operating technique, 48 patients with severe and rigid scoliosis were divided into two groups. In the first group. 26 patients were treated by APSF. In the second group, 22 patients were treated by APVCR. All patients bad a minimum 2-year follow-up. The radiographic parameters as well as anterior release length, posterior fusion length, screw number, operation time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization time, complication rate, and demographic data were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in age, gender, etiology, flexibility of main curve, anterior release length. posterior fusion length, screw number, and follow-up between the two groups. The APVCR group had longer operation and hospitalization time, and more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the preoperative main curve between the two groups, but the APVCR group had smaller main curve at postoperation and final follow-up, and higher correction rate at immediate postoperation and final follow-up. There was no significant difference in the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up thoracic kyphosis, and coronal and sagittal balance between the two groups. There was no significant difference in complication rate between the two groups. Analysis of the preoperative SRS-22 questionnaire revealed no difference between the two groups. At final follow-up. APSF and APVCR groups had similar scores in the function, pain, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction with the treatment domains. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with APSF, treating severe and rigid scoliosis by APVCR means longer operation and hospitalization time, and more blood loss, but it allows better correction rate of main curve. Furthermore, SRS-22 questionnaire improvement scores were similar for both correction methods. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Anterior Release Posterior Internal Distraction and Subsequent Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Severe Kyphoscoliosis

Anterior Release Internal Distraction and Posterior Spinal Fusion for Severe and Rigid Scoliosis

MEDIUM-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTERIOR RELEASE INTERNAL DISTRACTION FOR SEVERE AND RIGID SCOLIOSIS

Posterior Corrective Surgery for Moderate to Severe Focal Kyphosis in the Thoracolumbar Spine: 57 Cases with Minimum 3 Years Follow-Up

Radiologic Comparison of Posterior Release, Internal Distraction, Final PSO and Spinal Fusion with One-Stage Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Multi-Level Severe Congenital Scoliosis

Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior-Anterior Approach for Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Fractures

Comparison of anterior/posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior/posterior spinal fusion for severe and rigid scoliosis.

[Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Kümmell Disease with Kyphosis].

Anterior or Posterior Release for Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Which is Safer and More Effective?

Skull-femoral Traction after Posterior Release for Correction of Adult Severe Scoliosis: Efficacy and Complications

Posterior Multisegment Apical Convex plus Concave Intervertebral Release Combined with Posterior Column Osteotomy for the Treatment of Rigid Thoracic/Thoracolumbar Scoliosis.

Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Vertebral Column Resection Versus Anterior Release with Posterior Internal Distraction for Severe and Rigid Scoliosis

Comparison of Thoracoscopic Anterior Release Combined With Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Posterior-only Approach With an All-pedicle Screw Construct in the Treatment of Rigid Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Combined anterior and posterior surgery to treat kyphosis in children in healed stages of spinal tuberculosis

[Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Via Posterior Decompression and Fusion with Internal Fixation].

[Treatment of Lumbar Sagittal Split Fracture with Combined Anterior and Posterior Short Segment Fixation and Fusion].

Posterior Pedicle Screws Combined with Shortening and Release Techniques for Lumbar and Thoracolumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Combined Segmental Resection Osteotomy with Dual Axial Rotation Correction, Fixation and Fusion for the Treatment of Severe Angular Kyphosis

Proximal Kyphosis after Short Posterior Fusion for Thoracolumbar Scoliosis

Clinical study posterior decompression combined with different fusion with segmental fixation for treatment of degenerative scoliosis

Apical Segmental Resection Osteotomy with Dual Axial Rotation Corrective Technique for Severe Focal Kyphosis of the Thoracolumbar Spine