Giant Fibrothecoma Arising in an Accessory Ovary of A Pregnant Woman
Li Chun-yan,Qian Shao,Zhang Hui,Liu Ming,Shi Min,Mu Yu-lan,Chen Zi-jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20122195
IF: 6.133
2013-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:To the editor: Accessory ovary is an uncommon congenital anomaly of the female reproductive tract. Tumors arising in accessory ovaries are extremely rare. In this report we described a case of a giant fibrothecoma at accessory ovary in a pregnant woman in her first trimester. A 27-year-old G1P0 woman, pregnant at 9 weeks' gestation, presented persistent abdominal pain for 28 hours. She denied fever, vaginal bleeding, dysuria or bloody stools. Her ultrasonography revealed a right-side pelvic solid mass measured 6.5 cm×5.8 cm×4.5 cm 20 days ago. Menarche was regular and her last menstrual period (LMP) was on May 8, 2010. Physical examination revealed her blood pressure was 102/65 mmHg, and temperature was normal. Her abdomen was soft, but slightly and diffusely tender, and a 14.0 cm×14.0 cm solid mass was palpated in the right lower quadrant. Pelvic examination revealed the uterus was 9-week gestation in size and the large mass was in the upper uterine fundus. Ultrasonographic examination showed a right-side pelvic solid mass measured 14.0 cm×14.4 cm×7.5 cm in size and a normal gestation of 9 weeks. The serum CA125 level was 314.8 IU/L and other tumor markers were all normal. The rythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 68 mm/h. Red degeneration of uterine subserosal leiomyoma was considered and conservative treatment was suggested. After antibiotic therapy for 7 days, her abdominal pain showed no relieve while her serum CA125 level increased to 648.2 IU/L and ESR to 75 mm/h. The mass size enlarged to 18.0 cm×15.0 cm×12.0 cm in size and mild ascites was noted by ultrasonography. Malignant tumor was extremely suspected and an exploratory laparotomy was suggested. The woman asked for terminating pregnancy and induced abortion was performed before surgery. At laparotomy a giant solid mass was found in the abdominopelvic cavity, which stuck to the abdominal wall tightly and extensively. The mass was observed to arise from an accessory ovary, with a 2 cm stalk connected to the right ovary (Figure 1). It was a smooth, multilobulated, solid mass and the two ovaries showed no signs of torsion or necrosis. Her uterus and bilateral adnexa were normal with the right ovary 2 cm×2 cm×1 cm in size and the left ovary 3 cm×2 cm×1 cm in size. Further anomalies, including urogenital anomalies, were not identified. The large mass and the accessory ovary were totally removed from its stalk. The mass was composed mostly of solid tissue surrounded with necrotic tissues. Pathology diagnosis was ovarian fibrothecoma with hemorrhage and necrosis in large area. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful. The postoperative follow-up of 6 months, 12 months and 24 months revealed that the woman was asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence and her serum CA125 and estradiol were normal.Figure 1.: The mass have a 2-cm stalk connected to the right ovary. The internal genital organs, uterus and bilateral adnexa were normal, with the right ovary 2 cm×2 cm×1 cm and the left ovary 3 cm×2 cm×1 cm.An accessory ovary was defined as having close proximity and some form of association to a eutopic ovary and its associated blood supply, which is often found attached to the fallopian tube or one of the various ligamentous structures of the ovarian-uterine complex. Accessory ovaries are mostly incidental operative findings. No cases been diagnosed prior to operation in 18 cases of accessory ovary based on a systematic literature search using MEDLINE databases. Diagnosis of pelvic mass during pregnancy is highly problematic due to difficulties in obtaining clinical manifestations. In our case, the woman complained of an abdominal pain, and ultrasonographic examination demonstrated the presence of a solid mass near the uterus and normal ovaries. We provided the diagnosis of red degeneration of subserosal leiomyoma. The misdiagnosis suggests that an accessory ovarian tumor should be taken into consideration when a pelvic mass present with normal ovaries. Cases of accessory ovarian tumor reported were essentially managed based on the standard of ovarian tumors. In this case, conservative treatment was performed for suspicion of red degeneration of uterine leiomyoma. When the mass swelled rapidly, the serum CA125 level elevated and the abdominal pain continued, malignant tumor or pedicle torsion could not be neglected. Thus a laparotomy was suggested although at ten weeks' gestation. We suggested that whether her pregnancy could be continued depends on histological appearance and surgical stage. But the patient did want pregnancy termination before surgery. The postoperative histopathology proved the tumor was benign and conservative surgery of removing the accessory ovarian tumor performed. Thus there was no indication for pregnancy termination. In conclusion, tumors arising from accessory ovary should be taken into consideration when a pelvic mass is present. Chun-yan Li Shao Qian Hui Zhang Ming Liu Min Shi Yu-lan Mu Zi-jiang Chen Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Li CY, Zhang H, Liu M, Shi M and Mu YL), Department of Reproductive Center (Chen ZJ), Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jinan Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250001, China (Qian S)