Abstract:Objective To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of quantifying liver iron concentration (LIC) in patients with thalassemia (TM) using 1.5T and 3T T 2 * MRI. Methods 1.5T MRI T 2 * values were measured in 391 TM patients from three medical centers: the T 2 * values of the test group were combined with the LIC (LIC F ) provided by FerriScan to construct the curve equation. In addition, the liver 3T MRI liver T 2 * data of 55 TM patients were measured as the 3T group: the curve equation of 3T T 2 * value and LIC F was constructed. Results Based on the test group LIC F (0.6–43 mg/g dw) and the corresponding 1.5T T 2 * value, the equation was LIC F = 37.393 T 2 * ∧ (−1.22) (R 2 = 0.971; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between LIC e − 1.5T and LIC F in each validation group ( Z = −1.269, −0.977, −1.197; P = 0.204, 0.328, 0.231). There was significant consistency (Kendall's W = 0.991, 0.985, 0.980; all P < 0.001) and high correlation (r s = 0.983, 0.971, 0.960; all P < 0.001) between the two methods. There was no significant difference between the clinical grading results of LIC e − 1.5T and LIC F in each validation group (χ 2 = 3.0, 4.0, 2.0; P = 0.083, 0.135, 0.157), and there was significant consistency between the clinical grading results (Kappa's K = 0.943, 0.891, 0.953; P < 0.001). There was no statistical correlation between the LIC F (≥14 mg/g dw) and the 3T T 2 * value of severe iron overload ( P = 0.085). The LIC F (2–14 mg/g dw) in mild and moderate iron overload was significantly correlated with the corresponding T 2 * value (r s = −0.940; P < 0.001). The curve equation constructed from LIC F and corresponding 3T T 2 * values in this range is LIC F = 18.463T 2 * ∧ (−1.142) (R 2 = 0.889; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between LIC F and LIC e − 3T in the mild to moderate range (Z = −0.523; P = 0.601), and there was a significant correlation (r s = 0.940; P < 0.001) and significant consistency (Kendall's W = 0.970; P = 0.008) between them. LIC e − 3T had high diagnostic efficiency in the diagnosis of severe, moderate, and mild liver iron overload (specificity = 1.000, 0.909; sensitivity = 0.972, 1.000). Conclusion The liver iron concentration can be accurately quantified based on the 1.5T T 2 * value of the liver and the specific LIC-T 2 * curve equation. 3T T 2 * technology can accurately quantify mild-to-moderate LIC, but it is not recommended to use 3T T 2 * technology to quantify higher iron concentrations.

Virtual iron concentration imaging based on dual-energy CT for noninvasive quantification and grading of liver iron content: An iron overload rabbit model study

Dual-Energy CT for Patients Suspected of Having Liver Iron Overload: Can Virtual Iron Content Imaging Accurately Quantify Liver Iron Content?

The Influence of Liver Fat Deposition on the Quantification of the Liver-Iron Fraction Using Fast-Kilovolt-peak Switching Dual-Energy CT Imaging and Material Decomposition Technique: an in Vitro Experimental Study.

Evaluation of Liver Iron Content Using Synchrotron Radiation CT in Iron-Overload Mice

Virtual non-contrast of liver from dual energy CT: a clinical application

The Influence of Liver Fat Deposition on Liver Iron Overload Quantitative Assessment by Fast?kilovolt?peak Switching Dual?energy CT Imaging and Material Decomposition Technique: a Vitro Experiment Study

Effect of Iron Deposition on Native T1 Mapping and Blood Oxygen Level Dependent for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Rabbits with Carbon Tetrachloride Intoxication.

Quantification of Liver Iron Concentration Using the Apparent Susceptibility of Hepatic Vessels.

Comparative Study on Iron Content Detection by Energy Spectral CT and MRI in MDS Patients.

Simultaneous liver steatosis, fibrosis and iron deposition quantification with mDixon quant based on radiomics analysis in a rabbit model

Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Using Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Liver Iron Overload: From Precise Quantification to Prognosis Assessment

Digital Hepatic Iron Content: An Artificial Intelligence Model for Spatially Resolved Histologic Iron Quantitative Analysis in Liver Samples

The value of virtual touch quantification in assessment of liver function reserve in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a clinical study

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the Quantitative Assessment of Early-Stage Liver Fibrosis Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride in Rabbits.

Research Progress of CT in the Quantification Measurement of Liver Iron Content

Separation Of Hepatic Iron And Fat By Dual-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Based On Material Decomposition: An Animal Study

Quantitative assessment of angiogenesis of rabbit liver tumors by using fiat detector CT in the angiography suite

A multicenter study on the quantification of liver iron concentration in thalassemia patients by means of the MRI T2* technique

Using Dual-source Photon-counting Detector CT to Simultaneously Quantify Fat and Iron Content: A Phantom Study

Effect of Different Scan Parameters and Algorithm on Detection of Iron Deposition Coexiting in Fat by Dual Source CT