Photo-driven water oxidation performed by supramolecular photocatalysts made of Ru(II) photosensitizers and catalysts
Ambra M. Cancelliere,Antonino Arrigo,Maurilio Galletta,Francesco Nastasi,Sebastiano Campagna,Giuseppina La Ganga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0189316
IF: 4.304
2024-02-28
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Abstract:Two new supramolecular photocatalysts made of covalently linked Ru(II) polypyridine chromophore subunits ([Ru(bpy)3]2+-type species; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) and [RuL(pic)2] (L = 2,2′-bipyridine-6,6′-dicarboxylic acid; pic = 4-picoline) water oxidation catalyst subunits have been prepared. The new species, 1 and 2, contain chromophore and catalyst subunits in the molecular ratios 1:1 and 1:2, respectively. The model chromophore species [Ru(bpy)2(L1)]2+ (RuP1; L1=4-[2-(4-pyridyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-4-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine) and [Ru(bpy)2(L2)]2+ (RuP2; L2 = 4,4′-bis[2-(4-pyridyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-2,2′-bipyridine) have also been prepared. The absorption spectra, oxidation behavior, and luminescent properties of 1 and 2 have been studied, and the results indicate that each subunit largely maintains its own properties in the supramolecular species. However, the luminescence of the chromophore subunits is significantly quenched in 1 and 2 in comparison with the luminescence of the respective model species. Both 1 and 2 exhibit catalytic water oxidation in the presence of cerium ammonium nitrate, exhibiting an I2M mechanism, with a better efficiency than the known catalyst [RuL(pic)2] under the same experimental conditions. Upon light irradiation, in the presence of persulfate as a sacrificial acceptor agent, 1 and 2 are more efficient photocatalysts than a system made of separated [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and [RuL(pic)2] species, highlighting the advantage of using multicomponent, supramolecular species with respect to isolated species. The O–O bond formation step is I2M, even in the photo-driven process. The photocatalytic process of 2 is more efficient than that of 1, with the turnover frequency reaching a value of 1.2 s−1. A possible reason could be an increased local concentration of catalytic subunits in the needed bimolecular assembly required for the I2M mechanism in 2 with respect to 1, a consequence of the presence of two catalytic subunits in each multicomponent species 2.
chemistry, physical,physics, atomic, molecular & chemical